ANALISIS KESULITAN GURU DALAM PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK
Abstract
The purpose of this study to explain the difficulties teachers in implementing the thematic learning in the classroom and then provide a solution to the teachers, especially in elementary school 3 Haji Pemanggilan to implement thematic learning in classes I-III. This research uses descriptive method, the research subjects all teacher in elementary school state 3 Haji Pemanggilan.Techniques of data collection using a questionnaire and analyzed using percentage techniques. The results showed that; on indicator of knowledge factor they know but do not understand the concept of thematic learning and its sub-indicators, it is shown by the percentage of 80% of respondents.By 10% of respondents already and understand the concept of thematic learning, and 10% of respondents lack knowledge and understanding about the concept of thematic learning.Then on indicator of interest and willingness factor is as much as 60% of respondents have an interest and willingness in the medium category, and even 30% of respondents can be said to have a low interest and willingness, and only 10% of respondents who have a high interest and willingness.In addition, the indicators of carrying capacity is as much as 40% of respondents said that the carrying capacity of the thematic learning has not been adequate in the several themes of learning, even 50% of respondents said that the carrying capacity of the thematic learning is inadequate and only 10% of respondents who said that the carrying capacity in thematic learning was adequate. Based on the research concluded that the respondent had difficulty in the implementation of thematic learning as influenced by several factors, such as knowledge about the concept of thematic learning, low interest and willingness to understand the concept of thematic learning, inadequate carrying capacity, and socialization are less of education office.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Fathurrohman, Pupuh dan M. Sobry Sutikno. 2007. Strategi Belajar Mengajar melalui Penanaman Konsep Umum dan Konsep Islami. PT Refika Aditama. Bandung.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Untuk Sekolah Dasar. Depdikbud. Jakarta.
Hadi, Sutrisno. 1992. Statistika. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Hamalik, Oemar. 2011. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Hasyim, Ali Usman. 2010. Undang—Undang No 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen. http://aliusmanhs.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/undang-undang-no-14-tahun-2005-tentang-guru-dan-dosen/ Diakses tanggal 28 Februari 2013
Kunandar. 2007. Guru Profesional: Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) dan Persiapan Menghadapi Sertifikasi Guru. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Sudirman, A. M. 1994. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. PT Raja Grafindo Permai. Jakarta.
Sugandi, Achmad, dkk. 2004. Teori Pembelajaran. UPT MKK UNNES. Semarang.
Suparlan. 2006. Guru Sebagai Profesi. Hikayat Publishing. Yogyakarta.
Supranto, Johanes. 2000. Statistik Teori Dan Aplikasi. Erlangga. Jakarta.
Sutirjo dan Sri Istuti Mamik. (2005). Tematik: Pembelajaran Efektif dalam Kurikulum 2004. Bayumedia Publishing. Malang.
Tilaar, H.A.R. 1998. Beberapa Agenda Reformasi Pendidikan Nasional dalam Perspektif Abad 21. Tera Indonesia. Magelang.
Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (Bab I Pasal 1 Ayat 20)
Yunanto, Sri Joko. 2004. Sumber Belajar Anak Cerdas. Grasindo. Jakarta.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.