Studi Evaluatif Relevansi Model Pengembangan Kurikulum PGSD dengan Kurikulum SD di Bandar Lampung

Deviyanti Pangestu, Tegar Pambudhi, Maman Surahman

Abstract


The purpose of this study (1) to find out the relevance of the curriculum model development of Elementary School Teacher Education with the Elementary School curriculum, (2) to produce a level of improvement in courses that have relevance to the Elementary School curriculum, 3) produce textbooks. The method used in this study is Research and Development. Data collection used questionnaire and structured interview. The results showed that the average score of pedagogical competence of elementary school teachers was included in the excellent category. average score of professionalism of teachers included in the excellent category. The pedagogical abilities and professional abilities of teachers in relation to the relevance of the Elementary School Teacher Education curriculum with the curriculum in Primary Schools are included in the excellent category.

Keywords: subject curriculum, integrated curriculum, research and development


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jiip.v1i2.18027


Full Text:

PDF

References


Biggs, J.B. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 2nd Ed., The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham.

Cooper, James M. (1990). Classroom Teaching Skills. Lexington,Massachusetts Toronto. D.C. Heath and Company.

Ghazali, Syukur. (2010). Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Refika.

Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (2014). Approaches to learning. The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp. 39-58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

Parera, Daniel. (1986). Linguistik Edukasional. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Permendikbud Nomor 67 Tahun 2013 tentang Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah.

Permendikbud. Nomor 160 tahun 2014 pasal 4 tentang pemberlakuan kurikulum 2006 dan kurikulum 2013.

Piaget, J. (1972). The child and reality, problems of genetic psychology. New York: Penguin Books.

Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K, (2008). Teaching for learning in higher education.

Ramsden, P. (2012), Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London:Routledge.

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Spencer, Lyle M., Jr. & Signe M., Spencer. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. John Wiley & Sons. Inc.

Sukmadinata, Nana S. (2008). Pengembangan Kurikulum Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih (2004). Pengembangan Kurikulum; Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. (1986). Menyimak sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Undang-Undang No 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.

_____________. (1986). Membaca Ekspresif sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

_____________. (1986). Menulis Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2011). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960%2Fjiip.v1i2.18027

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Inovatif Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Inovatif Ilmu Pendidikan that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.