PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN TIPE PEMBELAJARAN EXAMPLE NON EXAMPLE TERHADAP PENGUASAAN MATERI
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to measure the influence of using Example Non Example learning type toward mastering of characteristics of living subject by students Class VII SMP NEGERI 3 Gadingrejo Academic Year 2011/2012, the average of mastering of characteristics of living subject in the classroom that using Example Non Example learning type higher than class discussion methods. Design used in this research was pretest-posttest design of non-equivalent groups. The sample was 31 students VIIA as control class and 31 students VIIF as experiment class. The research data were taken with the pretest and posttest. Data analysis was performed by t test. The results showed that the class that using Example Non Example learning type influenced significant in mastering of characteristics of living subject, consist of breathing, moving, sensitive to stimuli, eat, excrete the rest, grow and reproduce and adapt. Additionally average subject matter characteristics of living things on the students class that using Example Non Example learning type higher than students that using learning discussions.
Keywords: Characteristics of Living Subject, Example Non Example, Mastery of Content.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, O.W. dan D. Krathwohl. 2000. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. Longman Inc. New York.
Arikunto, S. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Edisi VI Rhineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Awaluddin, H. 2008. Teori dan Praktik
Belajar Efektif. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Daryanto. 1999. Pengelolaan
Pengajaran. Rhineka Cipta.
Jakarta.
Depdiknas, 2007. Model-Model
Pembelajaran Kooperatif.
Jakarta.
Hamzah, B. 2009. Model Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Irwansyah. 2007. Pengaruh
Pembelajaran Model Example Non Example Terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Biologi pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Bogor. Skripsi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung.
Loranz, D. 2008. Gain Score. Google.
http://www.tmcc.edu/vp/acstu/
assessment/downloads/documents/reports/archives/discipline/0708/SLOAPHYSDisciplineRep0708.pdf.
Muhammad. 2003. Belajar dengan
Pendekatan Pakem. Bina Cipta. Jakarta.
Mujiman, H. 2007. Manajemen
Pelatihan Berbasis Belajar Mandiri. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
Nurgiyantoro, B., Gunawan, dan Marzuki. 2002. Statistik Terapan untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Pratisto, A. 2004. Cara Mudah Mengatasi Masalah Statistik dan Rancangan Percobaan dengan SPSS. Gramedia. Jakarta.
Pudyo, S. 2004. Pengembangan Bahan
Pembelajaran IPA. Universitas
Negeri Malang. Malang.
Purwanto, M. N. 1991. Psikologi
Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Riyanto. 2001. Metode Penelitian
Pendidikan. Gava Media. Yogyakarta.
Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-
Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rhineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Slavin, R.E. 2002. Cooperatif Learning: Teori, Riset dan Praktek. Nusa Media. Bandung.
Sriyono. 1997. Efektivitas Pembelajaran
Menggunakan LKS. Rhineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian
Bisnis. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Sulitianingtyas. 2006. Peningkatan
Prestasi Belajar Biologi dengan Model Example Non Example pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Kalianda Lampung Selatan. Tesis. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Universitas Hamka. Jakarta.
Sudarto, 2006. Memahami Makhluk
Hidup. Bintang Pelajar. Surabaya.
Thoha, M. 1994. Evaluasi Belajar
Mengajar. Refika Aditama. Bandung.
Wijaya, A. 2007. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Teori dan Implementasi. Rhineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Bioterdidik: Wahana Ekspresi Ilmiah that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.