The Meaning of Being a Teacher in the Generation of Gen Z in the Phenomenological Approach

Rahmawati Rahmawati, Yon Rizal, Nurdin Nurdin

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to determine the meaning of being a teacher in the generation of Gen Z in the phenomenological approach and to determine the perspective of motivation related point of view to be a teacher in the generation of gen Z. this study uses a qualitative design using a phenomenological approach, namely researchers trying to enter the conceptual world of the subjects studied, namely gen z students of Economic Education Class of 2020. Data collection techniques include in-depth interviews and documentation. Based on the results of the study, the findings obtained 1) The Meaning of teachers according to Generation Z is that teachers are not smart teachers for themselves but for their students as well, 2) the most dominant encouragement to date is the parents, not only the support of parents of peers, the environment and social media also influence in determining the next steps.  3) rumors about a small salary, must PPG and compete with non FKIP, Teacher Platform. that this is not just a rumor but a serious problem that must be addressed.

Keywords: Meaning of Being a Teacher, Generation Z

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/E3J/v7i1.72-77

 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alma, Buchari. (2016). Kewirausahaan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Amalia & Pramusinto. (2020). Pengaruh Persepsi, Efikasi Diri dan Lingkungan Keluarga terhadap Minat Menjadi Guru. Business and Accounting Education Journal. 1(1). 84-94.

Barge, J. K., & Loges, W. E. (2003). Parent, student, and teacher perceptions of parental involvement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31(2), 140-163.

Basrowi. (2014). Kewirausahaan untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Creswell, W. J. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Daryanto & Cahyono A. D. (2013). Kewirausahaan: Penanaman Jiwa Kewirausahaan. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Djaali, H. (2012). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Djamarah, S. B. (2015). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Karina, M., Bila, N. S., Primantari, R., Tara, J. D., Rahmawati, A. F., Murti, N. W., ... & Novita, M. V. (2021). Gen Z Insights: Perspective on Education. Surakarta: Unisri Press.

Kurniawati, E., & Sugiyanto, C. (2021). Pengaruh struktur umur penduduk terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 21(1), 5.

Leontyev, D. A. (2016). The concept of motive in AN Leontiev and the problem of the quality of motivation. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. Psychology, 2, 3-18.

Mahadiansar, M., Ikhsan, K., Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S., & Aspariyana, A. (2020). Paradigma pengembangan model pembangunan nasional Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 17(1), 77-92.

Mendoza, K. R. (2018). Engaging generation Z: A case study on motivating the post-millennial traditional college student in the classroom. Johnson University.

Muhammad, Hasniyati Gani Ali, & Arifin. (2017). Pengaruh Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Orang Tua Terhadap Minat Melanjutkan Pendidikan Anak Di Desa Wunse Jaya Kecamatan Wawoni Tenggara Kabupaten Konawe Kepulauan. Jurnal Al-Ta’dib. 10(1). 163-180.

Nabila, L. N., Utama, F. P., Habibi, A. A., & Hidayah, I. (2023). Aksentuasi literasi pada gen-z untuk menyiapkan generasi progresif era revolusi industri 4.0. Journal of Education Research, 4(1), 28-36.

Rahayu, W. P. (2012). Analisis Intensitas Pendidikan oleh Orang Tua dalam Kegiatan Belajar Anak, Status Sosial Ekonomi Orang Tua terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (JPP).18(1). 65-71.

Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R., Chen, X., Bowker, J., & McDonald, K. L. (2013). Peer relationships in childhood. In Social and personality development (pp. 317-368). Psychology Press.

Slavin, Robert. (2017). Psikologi Pendidikan: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Solehudin, D., Priatna, T., & Zaqiyah, Q. Y. (2022). Konsep implementasi kurikulum prototype. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 7486-7495.

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565.

Tirtarahardja, Umar & La Sulo. (2005). Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0.

 

Economic Education and Entrepreneurship Journal
Gedung D Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Lampung Jl. Soemantri Brojonegoro No. 1 Bandar Lampung 35145