COMPARISON BETWEEN USING AUTHENTIC AND NON-AUTHENTIC MATERIALS IN STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT

Yuni Apriyani, Muhammad Sukirlan, Huzairin Huzairin

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan signifikan antara siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan materi otentik dan non-otentik juga untuk menyelidiki materi pembelajaran reading yang paling cocok digunakan untuk siswa. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas dua di SMPN 1 Metro. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 52 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah soal reading tentang teks naratif. Hasil perhitungan Independent Group T-Test menunjukkan thitung>ttabel (6.016 > 2.009) pada nilai reading antara kelas yang menggunakan materi authentic dan non-authentic dengan signifikansi <0,05. Hal ini berarti H1 diterima bahwa ada perbedaan signifikan dari perbandingan materi pembelajaran reading antara materi authentic dan materi non-authentic dalam nilai reading pada tingkat kelas kedua di SMPN 1 Metro.

This present study was aimed to find out whether there is a significant difference of students reading achievement between the students who are taught using authentic and those using non-authentic materials, and to find out which of the two materials is more effective to teach reading. The population was the second grade students of SMPN 1 Metro. There were 52 students as the sample. The instrument was reading test about narrative text. The result of Independent Group T-Test calculation showed that the tvalue >table (6.016 > 2.009) on the students reading achievement between those who are taught using authentic and those using non-authentic materials with p<0.05. It means H1 was accepted, that there was significant difference of students reading comprehension achievement between students who were taught by using authentic material and non-authentic material

Keywords: authentic material, non-authentic material, reading comprehension


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, T. 1995. What Makes Materials Authentic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, P. S. 1985. Language skills in Elementary Education. New York: The Macmilan C0.

Baird, K., & Redmond, M. 2004. The use of authentic materials in the K-12 french program. Winston-Salem, NC: Wake Forest University, Department of Education.

Hatch, E. and Farhady. 1982. Research design and statistics for applied linguistic. Long Angeles: Newbury House Publisher.

Mahfoodh, O.H. 2007. Reading for EFL College Students. Retrieved February 17th 2007 from http:///www.yementimes.com/article.sthml

Martinez, D. 2002. Authentic texts in Foreign language teaching, Theory and Practice, Dublin, Authentic. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Miller, L. 2003. Developing listening skills with authentic materials. New York: Princetown Review Publishing, L.L.C.

Nunan, D. 1989. Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rogers, C. V., & Medley, F. W. 1988. Language with a purpose: using authentic materials in the foreign language classroom. Canada: Nelson Education.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 U-JET