The effect of Time Token Arends as cooperative learning types on the students’ speaking skills at eleventh grade of SMAN 1 Bandar Lampung
Abstract
This research was aimed to find out the effect of Time Token Arends to students speaking skills aspects. This research applied qualitative and quantitative research by using the cooperative learning method. In taking the sample, the researcher used the purposive sampling technique. The number of the sample is 36 students at XI MIPA 1 SMAN 1 Bandar Lampung. The instrument of this research was an observation sheets, documentation and speaking test. There were 2 lesson plans and worksheets for the speaking test. The finding showed that there was a significant difference of students after being taught by using Time Token Arends strategy. Mean score of Pre-test was 58.7 and mean score of first Post-test was 69.1 and second Post-test was 76.1. Accent aspect increased 4.00, vocabulary aspect increased 3.33, comprehension aspect increased 3.34, fluency aspect increased 2.80, and grammar aspect increased 1.73.; it assumed that this technique has positive effect toward students speaking ability.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Chaney, A. L., & Burk, T. L. (1998). Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Allyn and Bacon, Order Processing, PO Box 11071, Des Moines, IA 50336-1071.
Darmuki, A., Andayani, A., Nurkamto, J., & Saddhono, K. (2015). Model Student Learning To Speak For Education Study Language And Literature Indonesia: Document Analysis And Needs Learning To Speak. Prosiding Prasasti, 99-109.
David, E. (2010). Writing and Speaking Booklet.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Hughes, R., & Reed, B. S. (2016). Teaching and researching speaking. Routledge.
Kagan, S., & Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan.
Kristiawan, M., Parlian, R. B., & Johari, I. (2016). The Effect of Time Token Technique towards Students’ Speaking Skill at Science Class of Senior High School 1 Pariaman. Al-Ta lim Journal, 23(1), 22-28.
Kunandar, S. P., & Si, M. (2008). langkah mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas sebagai pengembangan profesi guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Manser, M. H., & McGauran, F. (1995). Oxford learner's pocket dictionary. Oxford University Press.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical english. Language Teaching. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. sage.
Saur, T. (2014). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Sebagai Pengembang Profesi dan KeilmuanJakarta.
Sharan, S., & Shachar, H. (2012). Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. Springer Science & Business Media.
Setia, P., Pelajar, P., & Saudara, P. T. S. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2014. Prosedur Peneilitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Astuti, Kamsih. 2012. Gambaran Perilaku Merokok pada Remaja di Kabupaten Bantul. INSIGHT (Nomor 1 Vol 10). Hlm. 77-87 Bungin, Burhan. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 U-JET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.