The Use of Video to Improve Students' Writing of Procedure Text at the Second Grade of SMPN 8 Bandarlampung

Elisa Rakhmawati, Ujang Suparman, Gede Eka Putrawan

Abstract


This research aimed to find out whether or not there was significant improvement of students’ procedure text writing after the implementation of video as media and to investigate students’ perception with regard to interest, challenge, choice and enjoyment of the implementation of video as media in language learning. This research was conducted through quantitative and qualitative approach. A total of 29 eighth graders of SMPN 8 Bandarlampung took part in the current study. The instruments used in this research were writing test (pre- and post-test) and questionnaire. The resultshowed that students’ average score in the pre-test was 53.93 and in the post-test was 59.13, the gain score was 5.20. The result of the Paired Sample t-test confirmed the hypothesis that there was significant improvement in students’ procedure text writing, p<0.05, p = .000. The results of the questionnaire showed that this learning medium helps students increase their interest, provides them with challenge, choice, enjoyment.

Keywords: video, writing, procedure text, students’ perception

doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.23960/UJET.v10.i2.202108


Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Akmala, T. A. (2011). The use of animated film to improve students’ ability in writing narrative text: A classroom action research at the 10th grade of MAN Pemalang. Undergraduate script. Semarang: English Language Education Department, Walisongo State Institute for Islamic Study

Ariani, N. &. Haryanto, D. (2010). Pembelajaran multimedia di sekolah. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Barwick, J. (1999). Targeting Text: Recount, Procedure, Exposition, Upper Level. Sydney: Blake Education.

Christine, C. W., & Julie, W. (2000). Practical aspects of using video in the foreign language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. VI, No. 11, November 2000.

Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Canning-Video.html

Gentry, M., & Gable, R. K. (2001). My Class Activities: A survey instrument to assess students’ perceptions of Interest, Challenge, Choice and Enjoyment in their classrooms. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Pres.

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of english language teaching. Cambridge, UK. Pearson Education ESL.

Hatch, E. M., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Mass: Newbury House.

Indrasari, N. (2010). Improving students’ writing skill of narrative texts by using short videos. Temanggung: Raden Intan State Islamic University

Jacobs., Holly, L., Stephen, A., Zingkgraf., Deanne, R., Wormuth, V., Faye, H., Jane, B., Hughey. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A practical approach. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M.R. (1987) Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivation for learning. In Snow, RE. and Farr, M.J., Eds., Aptitude, Learning and Instruction III: Conative and affective process analyses, Erlbaum, ê Hillsdale.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. Singapore: McGraw-Hill

Permendikbud, R. I. No. 64 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud

Reyes, M. (2005). Teaching Technologies: Teaching english using video.

Retrieved from https://facultystaff.richmond.edu/t

Richard, J., & Renandya, W. A. (2001). Methodology in Language Teaching:

An anthology of current practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Setiyadi, Ag. Bambang. (2006). Metodologi penelitian untuk pengajaran bahasa asing, pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Shams, A., Khanam, A., & Imtiaz, S. (2016). The impact of audio-visual aids and graphic organizer on the writing Skills of ESL learners at AMU +2 Girls. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(5), 15-36.

Retrieved from https://www.longdom.org/abstract/the-impact-of-audiovisual-aids-and-graphic-organizers-on-the-writing-skills-of-esl-learners-at-amu-2-girls-2689.html.

Suparman, U. 2016. Penilaian dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Suparman, U., Ridwan, R. & Hariri, H. 2020a. Promoting Learning Performance and Learning Outcomes: The Case of an Indonesian School. The Asian EFL Journal, October 2020, Volume 27, Issue 4.1, pp. 94-110. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/monthly-editions-new/2020-monthly-editions/volume-27-issue-4-1-october-2020/

Suparman, U., Ridwan, R. & Hariri, H. 2020b. Overcoming Students’ English Pronunciation in Remote Area, Indonesia. The Asian EFL Journal, October 2020, Volume 27, Issue 4.1, pp. 94-110. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/monthly-editions-new/2020-monthly-editions/volume-27-issue-4-1-october-2020/

Suparman, U., Hariri, H., Haenila, E.Y., & Usman, M. 2020c. Completely randomized block design for assessment of the gender and personality effect on reading comprehension ability. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, Vol. 55 No. 4 Aug. 2020, pp. 1-14. DOI:10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.4.21. http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/666

Tassinari, M. (1996). Hands-on projects take students beyond the book. Social Studies Review. No. 34: 16-20

Vanderplank (1988). The value of teletext sub-titling in language learning. ELT Journal. No. 42: 272-281


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 U-JET

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.