Teaching reading using GIST viewed from students' intelligence at tenth grade of SMK N 1 Pekalongan
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui (1) Perbedaan yang signifikan pada pemahaman membaca siswa sebelum dan sesudah implementasi GIST; (2) Perbedaan yang signifikan pada pemahaman membaca siswa antara siswa dengan kecerdasan tinggi dan rendah; dan (3) Korelasi antara kecerdasan siswa dan pemahaman membaca siswa. Penelitian quasi-eksperimental ini menggunakan desain satu kelompok pretest post-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) Penggunaan GIST dalam proses meningkatkan pemahaman membaca siswa membawa respon positif bagi siswa (2) Siswa dengan kecerdasan tingkat tinggi cenderung memiliki pemahaman membaca yang lebih baik daripada siswa dengan kecerdasan rendah (3) Ada korelasi antara kecerdasan siswa dan pemahaman membaca siswa. Jadi, proses pemahaman bacaan melibatkan kecerdasan manusia untuk mendapatkan informasi teks yang benar. Dan menggunakan GIST dalam proses belajar mengajar, itu juga membantu guru dalam penyampaian materi sehingga lebih mudah dipahami oleh siswa.
The research is conducted in order to find out (1) the significant difference on students’ reading comprehension before and after the implementation of GIST; (2) the significant difference on students’ reading comprehension between students with high and low intelligence; and (3) There is correlation between students’ intelligence and students’ reading comprehension. This quasi-experimental research employs one group pretest post-test design. The results show that (1) The use of the GIST in the process of improving the students’ reading comprehension brings positive response for the students, (2) The Sstudents with high level of intelligence tend to have better reading comprehension than the student with low intelligence, (3) There is correlation between students’ intelligence and students’ reading comprehension. So, the process of reading comprehension involved human intelligence to get the right information of the text. Shortly, using GIST in the teaching and learning process assists teachers in the delivery of the material so it is easier to be understood by students.
Keywords: GIST, Reading Comprehension, Students’ Intelligence, Teaching Reading.Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arends, R. (1997). Classroom Instructional and Management.
New York: McGraw Hill Companies.
Armstrong. T. 2000. Multiple intelligences in the classroom.
Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publication Press.
Ary, Donald. (2008). Introduction to Research in Education. New
York: Nelson Education Ltd.
Boeree, C. G. (2003). Intelligence and IQ. Retrieved on May 1st,
, from
http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/intelligence.html
Creswell, John. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning,
Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative
Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
Cunningham, J. W. (1982). Generating interactions between
schemata and text. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.).
New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 42
– 47). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
Gall, M., Joyce, P.G., & Borg, W.R., (2003). Educational
Research. Boston: Allyn Bacon.
Grabe, William.,& Stoller, Fredericka L., (2002). Teaching and
Researching Reading. London: Pearson Education
Longman.
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional
intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.),
Emotional development and emotional intelligence:
Educational implications (pp. 3-31). New York, NY: Basic
Books.
Moursund, D. (1999). Project-based learning using information
technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for
Technology in Education.
Nancy, Frey., Douglas, Fisher., and Hernandez. (2003). “What’s
the Gist?” Summary Writing for Struggling Adolescent
Writers. Voices from the Middle, Volume 11 Number 2, pp
-49.
Nilsen, Richard. (2011). Signs of Low and High IQ. Retrieved on
November 11th 2019, from:
https://www.livestrong.com/article/29064-signs-low-
high-iq/
Ningsih, N.A. Kurniawan, Arri., (2015). Teaching Reading By
Using GIST Strategy Viewed from the Students’ Cognitive
Aspect on the Extensive Level of English Department
Students IKIP PGRI Madiun. English Teaching Journal: A
Journal of English Literature, Language and Education.
Vol. 3, No 2, pp. 54-60
Nuttal, C. (1982). Teaching Reading Skills in Foreign Language.
London. Heinenmann Educational Books.
Ormrod, Jeanne Ellis. (2011). Educational Psychology. Seventh
Edition. Boston: Pearson.
Payne, Laura. (2006). Characteristics of IQ. Retrieved on October
th 2017, from:
https://classroom.synonym.com/disadvantages-
intrapersonal-intelligence-8728319.html
Putri, Y. A., Suparman, Ujang., Hasan, Basturi., (2014). The
Implementation of Get- The- GIST Strategy in Improving
Students’ Reading Achievement. Retrieved on October
th 2017, from: http//.www.portalgaruda.com
Riani, Novi.,Yasin, Anas., Zaim., M., (2014). The Effect of Using
GIST (Generating Interaction between Schemata and
Text) and Students’ Reading Interest toward Students’
Reading Comprehension at Fifth Semester STKIP YPM
Bangko. Journal English Language Teaching (ELT) Volume
Nomor 1, pp. 104-112.
Saputra, J. B. (2014). Language Teaching Evaluation.
Organization, 5(4), 3.
Thomas K., et al, (1997). Educational Psychology: Windows on
Teaching. New York: Brown & Benmark.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 U-JET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.