The implementation of Peer-Feedback in enhancing students’ writing achievement at SMA Negeri 1 Ketapang
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah 1) untuk melihat apakah terdapat peningkatan kemampuan menulis siswa, secara umum, 2) melihat aspek menulis apa yang paling signifikan peningkatatannya setelah memperoleh perlakuan dengan menggunakan teknik peer feedback, serta 3) untuk mengetahui persepsi siswa terhadap penerapan teknik peer feedback. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain the one-group pretest-posttest yang melibatkan 32 siswa kelas X MIA 2 di SMA Negeri 1 Ketapang tahun akademik 2019/2020. Tes menulis dan kuesioner juga digunakan sebagai alat untuk mengumpulkan data. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis menggunakan paired sample t-test. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, teknik peer feedback dapat meningkatkan kemampuan menulis siswa, secara umum dan masing-masing aspek menulis juga dapat meningkat secara signifikan dan yang paling signifikan adalah language use. Berdasarkan hasil kuesioner, diperoleh informasi bahwa hampir semua siswa memiliki persepsi yang sangat positif terhadap penerapan peer feedback.
This research was conducted to investigate 1) whether there is any significant improvement in students’ writing achievement after being taught by using peer feedback technique, 2) to find out which aspect of writing that improves the most and 3) to find out students’ perception toward the implementation of peer-feedback technique. This research used the one-group pretest-posttest design that involved 32 students of X MIA 2 class at SMA Negeri 1 Ketapang in 2019/2020 academic year. The writing tests and questionnaire were also used as the instruments to collect the data. The data obtained were analyzed by using paired sample t-test. The results showed that there was a statistically significant improvement of students’ writing achievement in general, and all aspects of writing also improve significantly. Among other aspects, language use was the aspect of writing which improved the most. Furthermore, almost all of the students had a very positive perception about the benefits and the implementation of peer feedback.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahangari, S. (2014). The Effect of Self, Peer and Teacher Correction on the Pronunciation Improvement of Iranian EFL Learners. Department of English: Journal of Advances in Language and Literary Studies, Vol. 5, No.1: ISSN 22034714
Amrizal, and Hamdani, Z. (2017). The Effect of A Cooperative Script in Enhancing the Students’ Narrative Writing. Bandar Lampung: Muhammadiyah University.
Astuti, Anastasia Puji. (2013). The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback to Improve the Writing Ability of the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Kanisius Harapan Tirtomoyo in the Academic Year of 2012/2013. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University.
Byrne, Donn. (1988). Teaching writing skills. London and New York: Longman.
Curriculum, (2013). Struktur dan Isi Kurikulum 2013. Retrieved September 21st, 2019, from:http://www.academia.edu/16453172/STRUKTUR_DAN_ISI_KURIKULUM_2013
Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., and Smeets, S. (2010). A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback and of Various Peer Feedback Forms in A Secondary School Writing Curriculum. British Educational Research, 36(1), 143-162.
Hongrittipun, S. (1990). An Investigation into The Effects of Self-Correction in Combination with Peer Correction on Students’ Writing Proficiency and Their Attitude. Thailand: Mahidol University.
Itmeizeh, Mahmoud. J. (2016). Impact of Peer Correction on Reducing English Language Students' Mistakes in Their Written Essays in PAUC and Learners' Attitudes towards This Technique. Palestine: Palestine Ahliya University College.
Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Hertfordshire: Prentice-hall International Ltd.
Kreitner, B., and Kinicki, A. (1992). Organizational Behavior (7th Edition). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Nelson, G. L. and Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL Students’ Perceptions of Effectiveness in Peer Response Groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 113-131.
Nelson, G. L. and Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135-142.
Oshima, A. and Hogue, A. (2006). Writing Academic English (4th Edition). New York: Pearson Longman.
Park, Ah-Ryung. (2013) Peer Feedback Given by Korean High School Students and Its Effects on Their Revisions in EFL Writing. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Graduate School of Seoul National University.
Park, H. J. (2011). Implementation and Perception of Online Peer Feedback by Korean EFL Learners. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
Pratiwi, Minarni Atik. (2012). Peer Editing in the Teaching-Learning Process of Writing Descriptive Text at the Second Year of SMPN 3 Pekalongan East Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University.
Ratminingsih, N. M., Artini, L. P., and Padmadewi, N. N. (2017). Incorporating Self and Peer Assessment in Reflective Teaching Practices. International Journal of Instruction. Vol.10, No.4, Pp. 165-184.
Salma, Insani. (2016). A Comparative Study Between Peer-Correction and Self-Correction in Improving Students’ Writing Skill of Descriptive Text at the First Grade of SMA Negeri 6 Metro. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University.
Setiyadi, Ag.Bambang. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing, Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Stiggins, R.J. (2008). Assessment Manifesto: A Call for the Development of Balanced Assessment Systems. A Position Paper Published by the ETS Assessment Training Institute, Portland, Oregon.
Weigle, C. S. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitebeck, M. C. (1976). Peer Correction Procedures for Intermediate and Advanced ESL Composition Lessons: TESOL Quarterly, 10(3). 321.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 U-JET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.