Improving Work Engagement Through Compensatory Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being

Hafsah Mardhotillah, Siti Rochanah, Matin Matin

Abstract


Abstract: Improving Work Engagement Through Compensatory Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being. Objecticves: This study aims to identify the effect of compensation and psychological well-being on work engagement for private elementary school teachers during the pandemic. Methods: This study employed a quantitative approach with multiple linear regression analysis. The data retrieval technique used a Instrument developed from the utrech work engagement scale, a ryff psychological well-being scale and a compensation scale. Sample selection was done by using purposive cluster sampling technique. Research sampel is 408 teachers of private elementary schools in Karawang Regency. Findings: The results of this study confirm that: (1) Compensation had a significant effect on teachers work engagement, (2) Psychological well-being had a significant effect on teachers work engagement, and (3) Compensation and psychological well-being simultaneously affected teachers work engagement by 50.6%. Conclusions: It is concluded that work engagement is influenced by compensation and psychological well-being. Therefore, these two variables need to be considered in increasing teacher work engagement.

Keywords: psychological well-being, compensation, work engagement.

 

Abstrak: Meningkatkan Keterlibatan Kerja Guru Melalui Kepuasan Kompensasi dan Kesejahteraan Psikologis. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pengaruh kompensasi dan kesejahteraan psikologis terhadap keterlibatan kerja guru di masa pandemi. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis regresi linier berganda. Instrumen dikembangkan dari utrech work engagement scale, ryff psychological well-being scale dan skala kompensasi. Pemilihan sample dilakukan dengan teknik purposive cluster sampling. Sampel terdiri dari 408 guru SD swasta di Kabupaten Karawang. Temuan: Hasil penelitian ini mengkonfirmasi bahwa: (1) kompensasi berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keterlibatan kerja guru, (2) kesejahteraan psikologis berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keterlibatan kerja guru, dan (3) kompensasi dan kesejahteraan psikologis secara simultan berpengaruh terhadap keterlibatan kerja guru sebesar 50.6%. Kesimpulan: Disimpulkan bahwa keterlibatan kerja dipengaruhi oleh kompensasi dan kesejahteraan psikologis. Karenanya, kedua variabel tersebut perlu diperhatikan dalam meningkatkan keterlibatan kerja guru.

Kata kunci: kesejahteraan psikologis, kompensasi, keterlibatan kerja.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v11.i2.202116


Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku:

Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. (2010). Work engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory. New York: Psychology Press.

Mangkunegara, A. P. (2005). Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mangkuprawira, S. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik (Edisi kedua). Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Scott, W. R. (2015). Financial Accounting Theory. Toronto: Pearson Canada Inc.

Articles in Journals:

Alifiani, C., Utami, E., & Wijayanti. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Kompensasi dan kepuasan kerja terhadap work engagement (Studi pada pegawai PT. Naga Semut Kebumen). Volatilitas Jurnal, 2(3), 1-16.

Amalia, F. (2021). Pengaruh Self-Esteem Dan Psychological Well-Being Terhadap Job Performance Melalui Work Engagement Pada Karyawan Bank Di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 9(1).

Angel, P., Putra, A., & Sarinah. (2020). work engagement ditinjau dari psychological well-being pada karyawan PT. Sumatera Berlian Motors. Philantropy Journal of Psychology, 4(1) 45-56.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223.

Harlina, N. (2010). hubungan antara persepsi terhadap kompensasi dan semangat kerja pada kryawan operasional PT KAI (Persero) Purwokerto. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 8(2), 97-101.

Hasibuan. (2010). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hoole, C., & Hotz, G. (2016). The Impact of a total reward system of work engagement. SA Journal of industrial psychology, 42(1).

Kang, J., Lee, M., Fairchild, E., Caubet, S., Peters, D., Beliles, G., & Matti, L. (2020). Relationship Among Organizational Values, Employee Engagement, and Patient Satisfaction in an Academic Medical Center. Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, (pp. 4(1) 8-20).

Kimberly, & Utoyo, S. (2013). Hubungan Psychological Well-being dan work engagement pada karyawan yang bekerja di lokasi tambang. jurnal psikologi Universitas Indonesia, 1-18.

Maharani, Adistya Putri, & Endah Mujiasih. (2018). Hubungan Antara Persepsi Terhadap Kompensasi Gaji Pokok Dengan Work Engagement Pada Pegawai Honorer. Jurnal Empati, 7(2), 87-99.

May, D., Gilson, R., & Harter, L. (2004). The Psychological Condition of meaningfulness, safety, and avaibility and the engagement of human siprit a work. Journal of Occupational & organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.

Muhadi, Disya Nafisah, & Umi Anugerah Izzati. (2020). Hubungan Antara Psychological Well-Being Dengan Work Engagement Pada Perawat Instalasi Rawat Inap Di Rumah Sakit “X”. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 7(3)

Page, K., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). The 'what', 'why' and 'how' of employee well-being: A new model. Social indicators research, 90(3) 441-158.

Pranazhira, G. P., & Sukmawati, A. (2017). engaruh Kompetensi dan Kompensasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Work engagement Karyawan UKM Susu Kambing Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 8(1).

Robertson , I., & Cooper, C. (2010). Full Engagement: The Integration of Employee Engagement and Psychological Well-being. Leadership & Organization Development Journla, 31, 324-336.

Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is Everything, or is it? Exploration on the meaning of psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1069-1081. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire (A Cross-National Study). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4).

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonz, V., Martínezabel , I. M., Marisa, S., & Baker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

Schaufeli, Wilmar B. Martínez, Isabel M. Marques Pinto, Alexandra Salanova, Marisa Bakker, Arnold B.; Schaufeli, w B; MartíneZ, I M; Marques , A S; Alexandra Salanova, , Marisa Bakker; Marques Pinto, P A; Salanova, M. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Jurnal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481.

Utami, L. P. (2020). Pengaruh Psychological Well-being terhadap Work engagement Karyawan. Acta Psychologia, 2(2), 161-172. Available online at: http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/acta-psychologia.

Vijayakumari, K., & Vrinda, K. C. (2016). Work engagement in relation to psychological well-being and motivation at work. Guru Journal of behavioral and social sciences, 6, 589-594.

Seminar:

Mujiasih, E., & Ratnaningsih, I. Z. (2012). Meningkatkan Work Engagement melalui Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Budaya Organisasi. seminar nasional call for papers.

Kang, J., Lee, M., Fairchild, E., Caubet, S., Peters, D., Beliles, G., & Matti, L. (2020). Relationship Among Organizational Values, Employee Engagement, and Patient Satisfaction in an Academic Medical Center. Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, (pp. 4(1) 8-20).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.