Email this article PENERAPAN LKPD BERBASIS KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI-SWH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI TERTULIS DAN LITERASI SAINS SISWA
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to find written argumentability and saw an increase in students science literacy through student worksheet based argumentation SWH abilities. The method used is a quasi-experimental. The design of this research was pretest and posttest non equivalent between the experiment class and control class. The result shawed that using student worksheet written argumentation ability skill get sufficient characterized that was 71%. The results showed that were significant difference between in the experimental class with N-gain that was 0.72 and the control class with N-gain that was 0.16.
Tujuan penelitian ini untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berargumentasi tertulis dan literasi sains siswa melalui LKPD berbasis kemampuan argumentasi SWH. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan non equivalent control group design yaitu dengan melihat perbedaan pretest maupun postest antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Hasil penelitian meunjukkan bahwa penggunaan LKPD berbasis kemampuan argumentasi-SWH dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berargumentasi tertulis sebesar 71% dengan kriteria cukup. Peningkatan literasi sains yang signifikan terjadi pada kelas eksperimen dengan N-gain = 0,72 berbeda secara signifikan dengan kelas kontrol (N-gain = 0,16).
Kata kunci: LKPD, argumentasi, literasi sains
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bahri, S. 2010. Penggunaan Multiplerepresentasi dan Argumentasi Ilmiah Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Pada Siswa.
Breakspear, S. 2012. The Policy Impact of PISA: An Exploration of the Normative Effects of International Benchmarking in School System Per-formance. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 71. OECD Publishing (NJ1).
Chiappetta, dkk 1993. Do middle school life Science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes. Journal of research in science teaching, 30(7), 787797.
Creswell, J.W. 1997. Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publication London.
Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., and Hickey, D. T. 2008. Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837-861.
Curto K and T Bayer. 2005. An Intersection of Critical Thingking and Communication Skillls. Journal of Biological Science 31(4):11-19.
Duschl, R. 2008. Science education in threepart harmony:Balancing concepttual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32(1), 268-2.
Depdiknas. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta.
Erduran, S, Osborne, J, and Simon, J., 2005. The role of argument in Developing Science Literacy. K. Boesma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong, & H. Eijkelhof [Eds]. Research and Quality of Science Education.Dordrecht, Nederlands: Spinger.
Gunawan, I. 2013. Statistika untuk Kependidikan Sekolah Dasar. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Ombak.
Hand, B. and Choi, A. 2010. Examining the impact of student use of multiplemodal representations in constructing arguments in organic chemistry laboratory classes. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 29-44.
Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., Stecher, B. M., Klein, S. P., Robyn, A., and Bugliari, D. 2003. Studying large-scale reforms of instructional practice: An example from mathematics and science. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 25(1), 129.
Kelly, G. J., and Takao, A. 2002. Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students use of evidence in writing. Science education, 86(3), 314342.
Kurnia, F dan Fathurohman, A. 2014. Analisis Bahan Ajar Fisika SMA Kelas XI Di Kecamatan Indralaya Utara Berdasarkan Kategori Literasi Sains. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 43-47.
Liliasari, 2011. Membangun Masyarakat Melek Sains Berkarakter Bangsa Melalui Pembelajaran. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar NasionalUNNES.
Pranot o, I. 2011. Mengkaji Rel evansi Kecakapan Pemecahan masalah Tak Rutin Dalam Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika IV (No.4).
Prastowo, A. 2011. Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press(Anggota IKAPI).
Sandoval. 2005. The Quality Of Students Use Evidence In Written Scientific Explanation Cognition And Intruction. Journal International of Science Education.
Semi, M.A.2007. Dasar-Dasar Keterampilan Menulis. Bandung: Angkasa.
Sunyono. 2014. Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Multipel Representasi dalam Membangun Model Mental dan Penguasaan Kimia Dasar Mahasiswa. Disertasi Doktor, (tidak diterbitkan). Surabaya: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Zohar, A. and Nemet, F. 2002. Fostering students knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.