PTS Chemistry Question Points Class X MIPA-1 Difficulty Analysis in Online Learning (2019/2020) in SMA 10 Bengkulu City

R.Pan R.Pan, Alek Sudarmanto, Windy Otaviannissa, Ahmad Walid

Abstract


Abstract: PTS Chemistry Question Points Class X MIPA-1 Difficulty Analysis in Online Learning (2019/2020) in SMA 10 Bengkulu City. The purpose of this study is to assess the appropriateness of the level of difficulty of semester assessment questions in Chemistry class X MIPA-1 at SMA 10 Kota Bengkulu. The descriptive method was used in the research, and data was collected in this study through documentation, interviews, and question items. This study analyzes the data collected using the formula   to determine the level of difficulty of the question and is based on the results of the analysis of the question given by the teacher of Chemistry class X MIPA-1. The details of the questions given fall into the category of difficult questions when viewed from the level of difficulty. It can be seen that 17 children (53.125 % ) have difficult questions, 7 children (21.875 % ) have moderate questions, and 8 children (25 % ) have easy questions.

 

Keywords: Analysis, Problem Difficulty Level, Chemistry Lessons.


Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Anggrawan, A. (2019). Analisis Deskriptif Hasil Belajar Pembelajaran Tatap Muka dan Pembelajaran Online Menurut Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa. MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 18(2), 339-346.

Arzayeva, M., Rakhimzhanov, K., Abdrahmanova, A., & Umitkaliev, U. (2015). Special aspects of distance learning in educational system. Anthropologist, 22 (3), 449-454. Dewi, W. A. F. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 terhadap implementasi pembelajaran daring di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2 (1), 55-61.

Baharin, R., Halal, R., Aji, S., Yussof, I., & Saukani, N. M. (2020). Impact of Human Resource Investment on Labor Productivity in Indonesia. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 13 (1), 139–164.

Firman, F., & Rahayu, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Online di Tengah Pandemi Covid19. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 2 (2), 81-89.

Hanum, N.S. (2013). Keefektifan e-learning sebagai media pembelajaran (studi evaluasi model pembelajaran e-learning SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Purwokerto. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Jurnal pendidikan vokasi, vol.3, no.1 (2013) diunduh pada journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpu/article/view/1584/1314.

Kadir, A. (2015). Menyusun dan Menganalisis Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Al-Ta'dib Vol. 8, No. 2, Juli-Desember, 72.

Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ratcliffe, Rebecca (2 Maret 2020). "First coronavirus cases confirmed in Indonesia amid fearsnation is ill-prepared for an outbreak". The Guardian (dalam bahasa Inggris). Diakses tanggal 2 Maret 2020.

Sadikin, A., & Hamidah, A. 2020. Pembelajaran Daring di Tengah Wabah Covid-19. BIODIK, 6(2), 109-119.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sudjana, N. (2012). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Sutrisno, S. 2020. INCREASED LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND OUTCOMES THROUGH ONLINE LEARNING WITH GOOGLE CLASSROOM IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC PERIOD. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 5(1), 95-106.

Syamsudin. (2012). Pegukuran Daya Pembeda, Taraf Kesukaran, dan Pola Jawaban Tes (Analisis Butir Soal). Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah "At-Tajid" vol. 1, No. 2, 189- 190.

Waryanto, N.H. (2006). Online learning sebagai salah satu inovasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Jurnal Matematika, Vol. 2, No.1, Desember 2006: 10-23 diunduh.

Wulandari, M.S. & Rahayu, N. (2010). Pemanfaatan media pembelajaran secara online (e-learning) bagi wanita karir dalam upaya meningkatkan efektivitas dan fleksibilitas.

Zhafira, N. H., Ertika, Y., & Chairiyaton, C. (2020). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Perkuliahan Daring Sebagai Sarana Pembelajaran. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Kajian Strategi Manajemen, 4(1).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.