THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STRATEGIES AND TEXT TYPES IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION
Abstract
The objectives of this research are to find out whether there is any correlation between students’ learning strategies and text types in students’ reading comprehension; and to investigate which learning strategy is mostly applied by students in reading. The design of this research is a co-relational study of ex post design. The sample of the research was class VIII B consisting of 30 students. The result shows that there is a correlation between students’ learning strategies and text types in students’ reading comprehension with rxy are 0.416 (on descriptive text) and 0.403 (on recount text) with N 30 at = 0.05 while rtable is 0.3494. Thus, rxy > rtable; meaning that there is correlation of the two variables which are categorized as moderate correlation. Another result shows that metacognitive strategies are mostly applied by students in reading. It has been found that the mean of cognitive learning strategies is 32.1; metacognitive strategies is 32.33; and socio-affective strategies is 28.5. The researcher suggests that the English teacher should apply metacognitive strategies in teaching reading comprehension as one of alternative strategies especially because it has been found that the strategy can make them successful in learning reading.
Keywords: descriptive text, learning strategies, reading comprehension, recount text, text types
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anggraini, H. 2007. The Effect Metacognitive Learning Strategies in Reading toward Students’ Reading Comprehension at SMAN 1 Kota Gajah Lampung Tengah. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University.
Aseany, T. 2005. The Correlation between Learning Strategies in Reading and Students’ Reading Achievement at The Second Year of SMAN 2 Bandar Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University.
Chamot, A. U. 2004. Issues in Language Learning Strategy Research and Teaching.Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. Vol. 1, No.1, 2004. pp 14–26. Centre for Language Studies. National University of Singapore. Retrieved April 14, 2006,http://eflt.nus.edu.sg/v1n12004/ chamot.pdf.
Depdiknas. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Grellet, F. 1981. A Practical Guide to Reading Comprehension Exercise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haycraf, J.1978. An Introduction to English Language Teaching, London: Longman Group Limited.
Mayer, R. 2003. Learning and Instruction. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Nuttall, C. 1985. Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-M, G., Russo, R. P., and Kupper. 1985. Learning Strategy Applications with Students of English as a Second Language. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (3): 557-584.
O'Malley, J. M., and Chamot, A. U. 1999. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Park, G. 2010. Investigation into Learning Strategies Used by Effective and Less Effective EFL Learner in Korea. South Korea: Soonchunhyang University.
Richard, J. and Platt, J. 1992. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Essex: Longman.
Setiyadi, A. B. 2006. Metode Penelitian untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graha Ilmu.
Smith, F. 1982. Understanding Reading. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Suparman, U. 2007. Reading Strategies of EFL. Tangerang: Matabaca
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)