Email this article IDENTIFIKASI PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE CALON GURU FISIKA MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MULTIREPRESENTASI
Abstract
This research aimed to identify a set of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) components which were developed through quantum physics instructions based on multiple representation approach. Participants involved in this research were 37 pre-service physics teachers who were enrolled in a quantum Physics course. During the course, pre-service physics teachers were trained to develop their PCK in every learning sequence indirectly. Data were collected via recordings of observation, quantum physics understanding survey, and indepth-interview related to learning strategies. The results revealed that the pre-service physics teachers’s PCK components have been identified and shaped their knowledge and beliefs of pre-servive physiscs students indirectly about how to prepare effective teaching and learning. Moreover, the instruction enhanced quantum Physics conceptual understanding significantly.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi sejumlah komponen Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) yang dikembangkan dari implementasi pembelajaran fisika kuantum berbasis pendekatan multirepresentasi. Selama perkuliahan mahasiswa secara tidak langsung dilatih mengembangkan kemampuan PCK dalam tiap sekuen pembelajaran berbasis multirepresentasi. Mahasiswa calon guru fisika yang terlibat dalam penelitian ini 37 orang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan observasi, survei penguasaan konten fisika kuantum, dan wawancara mendalam terkait dengan strategi pembelajaran. Hasil yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa telah teridentifikasi sejumlah komponen PCK yang secara tidak langsung membentuk pola pengetahuan dan kayakinan calon guru fisika tentang bagaimana mengembangkan pembelajaran yang lebih efektif. Selain itu terjadi peningkatan penguasaan konten fisika kuantum mahasiswa secara signifikan.
Kata kunci : calon guru fisika, multirepresentasi, pedagogical content knowledge.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Carolan, J., Prain, V., dan Waldrip, B. 2008. Using Representations for Teaching and Learning in Science. Teaching Science, 54 (1), 18-23.
Chang, Y.H., Chang C.Y.,dan Tseng Y.H,. 2010. Trends of Science Education Research: An Automatic Content Analysis. Journal of Science Education Technology, vol. 19:315-331.
Cheng, H.J., dan Zhan, H. 2012. Examining Pre-Service Teachers' Instructional Strategies for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge via Video-Conferencing. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(2), 57-76.
Creswell, J.W., dan Clark V.P. 2007. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Darling-Hammond, L. 1994. Professional Development Schools: Schools for Developing A Profession. New York: Teachers College Press.
de Jong, O., Ahtee, M., Goodwin A., Hatzinikita, V. & Koulaidis V. 1999. An International Study of Prospective Teachers' Initial Teaching Conceptions and Concerns: the Case of Teaching Combustion. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 45-59.
Etkina, E. 2010. Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Preparation of High School Physics Teachers. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 6.020110.
Faikhamta, C., Coll RK., dan Roadrangka V. 2009. The Development of Thai Pre-Service Chemeistry Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge: From a Meethod Course to Field Experience. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia. Vol.32 No.1, 18-35.
Feynman, R. 1965. The development of the space-time view of quantum electrodynamics: Nobel lecture. Available online: http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html, diunduh 20 Februari 2009.
Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Gunduz, S. 2006. Comparing Student Understanding of Quantum Physics When Embedding Multimodal Representations into Two Different Writing Formats: Presentation Format Versus Summary Report Format, dari www.interscience.wiley.com, diunduh 15 Oktober 2007.
Kohl, B.P., dan Finkelstein, N.D. 2006. Effect of instructional environment on physics students' representational skills. Physical Review Special Topiks-Physics Education Research, 2, 010102.
Kohl, P.B., D. Rosengrant., dan N.D. Finkelstein. 2007. Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 3, 010108-2007.
Lemke, J. 1998. Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. Dalam: J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.). Reading science (pp.87-113). London: Routledge.
Loughran, J.J., Berry, A., & Muhhall, P. 2006. Undertanding and Developing Science Teacher's Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. 1999. Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. Dalam J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implica-tions for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Meltzer D. E. 2005. Relation between students' problem-solving performance and representational format. American Journal of Physics 73 (5), 463.
Niess, M.L. 2005. Preparing Teachers to Teach Science and Mathematics with Technology: Developing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Teaching and Teaacher Education, 21, 509-523
Nilsson, P., dan Loughran, J. 2011. Exploring the Development of Pre-Service Science Elementary Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23 (7), 699-721
Nuangchalerm, P. 2012. Enhancing Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Preservive Science Teachers. Higher Education Studies., vol 2, No 2: 66-71.
Podolefsky, N.D, dan Finkelstein, N.D. 2007. Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: An example from electromagnetic waves. Physical Review Special Topiks-Physics Education Research, 3, 010109.
Roberts, D. 1996. Epistemic Authority for Teacher Knowledge: The potential Role of Teacher Communities: A Response to Robert Orton. Curriculum Inquiry 26 (4), 417-431.
Shulman, L.S. 1986. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (1), 4-14.
Shulman, L.S. 1987. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review 57 (1):1-22.
Sperandeo-Mineo R.M., Fazio C., dan Tarantino G,. 2005. Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development and Pre-Service Physics Teacher Education: A Case Study. Journal of Research in Science Education.
Tashakkori, A. dan Teddlie, C. 2009. Foundations of Mixed Method Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approach in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Thomson, J.R., Christensen, W.M, dan Wittmann, M.C. 2011. Preparing Future Teachers to Anticipate Students Difficulties in Physics in A Graduate-Level Course in Physics, Pedagogy, and Educational Research. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 7,010108.
Treagust, D. 2006. Trends in Science Education Research. Dalam: Ramadas J, Chunawala S. (eds). Research Trends in Science, Technology, and Mathematics Education. Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India, pp 125-146.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.