Email this article How Can We Enhance PISA Ranking Through Effective Learning Methods? Systematic Literature Review From 2019 to 2024
Abstract
Abstract: Objective: The research aims to identify effective learning methods to improve Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) rankings; this study undertakes a comprehensive analysis of relevant literature. PISA results provide a benchmark for assessing students' reading, mathematics, and science literacy abilities—crucial indicators of a nation's educational success. Most countries within the OECD utilize PISA assessment results to shape their educational policies. As nations strive to enhance their educational frameworks, particularly in teaching methodologies, the pursuit of influencing PISA rankings becomes increasingly competitive. Countries with lower PISA rankings often look to adopt best practices in literacy improvement from those with higher rankings. This study aspires to deliver best practices to bolster students' literacy skills, thereby improving PISA standings. Methods: The systematic literature review (SLR) is designed by the PRISMA diagram flow, encompassing the critical stages of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. The SLR draws from 14 articles sourced from the Scopus database. Findings: The findings reveal that innovative teaching approaches, such as context-based learning and the integration of digital tools, significantly enhance students' performance in reading, mathematics, and science literacy. Notably, reading literacy is improved through the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) model, which focuses on collaborative learning. Mathematics literacy benefits from STEM-themed materials that bridge abstract concepts to real-world applications and through oral questioning techniques that foster critical thinking. Science literacy skills are advanced through digital comic materials, simplifying complex concepts, while STEM learning applications enhance students' understanding and engagement. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study underscores the vital role of appropriate teaching methods in improving learning outcomes and boosting student engagement in the international PISA assessment. By strategically adopting effective educational strategies from countries with higher PISA rankings, significant advancements can be made, offering hope for the future of education.
Keywords: learning, method, PISA.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i2.2024100
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AlAli, R. & Wardat, Y. (2024). Low PISA performance students: factors, perceptions, and improvement strategies. International Journal of Religion, 5(9), 334-348. https://doi.org/10.61707/nve8gj33
Aliyah, U., & Mulawarman, M. (2020). Kajian systematic literature review (SLR) untuk mengidentifikasi dampak terorisme, layanan konseling dan terapi trauma pada anak-anak. Islamic Counseling Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 4(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.29240/jbk.v4i2.1759
Almoslamani, Y. (2022). The impact of learning strategies on the academic achievement of university students in Saudi Arabia. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 18(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/LTHE-08-2020-0025
Araújo, L., Costa, P., Crato, N. (2021). Assessment background: What PISA Measures and How. In: Crato, N. (eds) Improving a country’s education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-4_12
Belmekki, L. (2021). Classroom questioning culture: benefits, characteristics, opportunities and obstacles. Revue Linguistique et Référentiels Interculturels, 2(1), 36-40. https://doi.org/10.34874/IMIST.PRSM/liri-v2i1.27503
Bramlett, R.K. (1994). Implementing cooperative learning: a field study evaluating issues for school-based consultants. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405%2894%2990029-9
Cooper, C., Booth, A., Varley-Campbell, J., Britten, N., & Garside, R. (2018). Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–14.
Dahal, N. (2022). Narratives of Nepali school mathematics teachers on classroom questioning techniques. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12100
Dewi, N. R., & Maulida, N. F. (2023). The development of STEM-nuanced mathematics teaching materials to enhance students’ mathematical literacy ability through information and communication technology-assisted Preprospec learning model. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(2), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.2.409
Dzaiy , A. H. S. ., & Abdullah , S. A. . (2024). The use of active learning strategies to foster effective teaching in higher education institutions. Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 28(4), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18
Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish autonomous communities. Computers & Education, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969
Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Giménez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish Autonomous Communities. Computers & Education, 157, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969
Fhathah, Q.H., & Nuraeni (2020). Promoting students' reading comprehension with cooperative integrated reading and composition (Circ). English Journal, 14(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.32832/english.v14i1.3841
Fitria, Y., Malik, A., Mutiaramses, H., Halili, S. H., & Amelia, R. (2023). Digital comic teaching materials: Its role to enhance students’ literacy on organism characteristic topic. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), em2333. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13573
Fitria, Y., Malik, A., Mutiaramses, Halili, S. H., & Amelia, R. (2023). Digital comic teaching materials: It’s role to enhance student’s literacy on organism characteristic topic. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), em2333. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13573
Flemming, K., Booth, A., Garside, R., Tunçalp, Ö., & Noyes, J. (2019). Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods. BMJ Glob Health, 4(Suppl 1)(e000882). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000882
Freeman, B., Marginson, S., & Tytler, R. (2019). An international view of STEM Education. In STEM Education 2.0. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004405400_019
Gesi M, Soldani P, Ryskalin L, Morucci G, Natale G. (2022). “Sport and anatomy”: teaching, research, and assistance at the university of pisa. Sustainability, 14(13),8160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1413816
Gough, D., Thomas, J. & Oliver, S. (2019). Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems. Systematic Reviews, 8, 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2
Gunga, S.O. (2010). Challenges of implementation of e learning in mathematics, science and technology education (MSTE) in African schools: A Critical Review. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 5(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.20355/C5JS3B
Habiddin , H. ., Ashar, M. ., Hamdan, A. ., & Nasir, K. R. . (2022). Digital comic media for teaching secondary school science. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 16(03), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i03.28967
Harisatunisa, H., & Sauqi, C. (2023). Implementasi pembelajaran kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal penginyongan. Jurnal Kependidikan, 11(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v11i2.8641
Harvey, S., & Light, R.L. (2015). Questioning for learning in game-based approaches to teaching and coaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 6, 175 - 190. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2015.1051268
Haturrahma, M., Salija, K., & Sakkir, G. (2023). The implementation of cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) strategy in teaching students writing skill at junior high school. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 3(2), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.51629/cjls.v3i2.147
Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., Putra, Z., & Wijoyo, H. (2023). Developing STEM autonomous learning city map application to improve critical thinking skills of primary school teacher education students. Perspectives of Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2023.4.41
Hsu, C.-L., Jin, K.-Y., & Chiu, M. M. (2020). Cognitive diagnostic models for random guessing behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 570365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570365
Indreswari, H., Probowati, D., & Rachmawati, I. (2022). Psychological Well-Being and student academic burnout. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 7(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v7i32022p138-149
Ismawati, E., Hersulastuti, & Amertawengrum, I. P. (2023). Portrait of education in Indonesia: Learning from PISA results 2015 to present. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(1), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.18
Jekri, A., & Han, C.G. (2020). The challenges in implementing stem teaching and learning in secondary schools. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 5(34), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.534006
Johnson, C.C. (2012). Implementation of STEM education policy: challenges, progress, and lessons learned. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1949-8594.2011.00110.X
Kalaycı Alas, D., & Tezer, M. (2024). Artificial neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system hybridized models in the sustainable integration of language and mathematics skills: The case of Singapore and Hong Kong. Sustainability, 16(7806). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177806
Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environment, 10, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
Kibirige I. (2023). Primary teachers’ challenges in implementing ICT in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) in the post-pandemic era in Uganda. Education Sciences, 13(4), 382. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040382
Kitchenham, Barbara Ann & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE, 1(January 2007), 1–54.
Kitchenham, B. & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 55(12), 2049–2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010
Kusdinar, A. & Kismiantini, K. (2022). The role of students’ non-cognitive factors and school resources in predicting mathematics achievement using PISA 2018 Indonesia data. AIP Conference Proceeding, 8 December 2022; 2575 (1): 040005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0111125
Kusmaryono, I., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2023). Evaluating the results of PISA assessment: Are there gaps between the teaching of mathematical literacy at schools and in PISA assessment? European Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 1479-1493. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.3.1479
Lew, S. L., & Krishnasamy, S. (2023). Information technology capability (ITC) framework to improve learning experience and academic achievement of mathematics in Malaysia. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 21(1), 36-51. https://www.ejel.org
Liu, A., Wei, Y., Xiu, Q., Yao, H., & Liu, J. (2023). How learning time allocation makes sense on secondary school students’ academic performance: A Chinese evidence based on PISA 2018. Behavioral Sciences, 13(237), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030237
Liu, A., Wei, Y., Xiu, Q., Yao, H., & Liu, J. (2023). How learning time allocation make sense on secondary school students’ academic performance: A Chinese evidence based on PISA 2018. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 237.
Mahmud, M. S., & Mohd Drus, N. F. (2023). The use of oral questioning to improve students' reasoning skills in primary school mathematics learning. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1126816. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1126816
Maryani, N., Sujana, A., Sopandi, W., & Rahman, R. (2020). Students’ literacy abilities in reading comprehension through cooperative integrated reading composition (CIRC) Model. International Conference on Elementary Education, 2(1), 1799-1809. Retrieved from http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/icee/article/view/808
Michael, D., & Kyriakides, L. (2023). Mediating effects of motivation and socioeconomic status on reading achievement: A secondary analysis of PISA 2018. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 11(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00181-9
Munn, Z., Barker, T. H., Moola, S., Tufanaru, C., Stern, C., McArthur, A., Stephenson, M., & Aromataris, E. (2020). Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2127–2133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099
Nadaf, A., & Seb, A. (2021). Interpretable machine-learning evidence for importance and optimum of learning time. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(31), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00181-9
Ngodu, A., Ndibalema, P. M., & William, F. (2024). Context-relevant strategies for ICT integration in teaching and learning science subjects in Tanzania secondary schools. Educational Technology Quarterly, 2024(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.704
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2015-assessment-and-analytical-framework_9789264281820-en.html
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
OECD. (2020). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.html
Okoli, C. (2015). A Guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(43), 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Prabawa, A. (2023). The contribution of psychological well-being and self-compassion toward student’s academic hardiness: a study in islamic boarding school. Indonesian Journal of Guidance and Counseling: Theory and Application, 12(2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijgc.v12i2.76404
Prabawa, A. (2024). The contribution of psychological well-being to academic hardiness: a study on “mahasantri”. Proceeding of International Interdiciplinary Conference And Research Expo, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18326/iicare.v1i1.624
Pratiwi, A. S. & Setiyowati, A. J. (2024). Individual happiness and well-being as a strategy to increase productivity. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research,7(1), https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v7i1.237
Ramli, N.F., Talib, O., Hassan, S.A., & Manaf, U.K. (2017). Instructional approaches and challenges of STEM instructional implementation: a systematic review. In: Graduate Research in Education Seminar (GREduc) 2017, 16 Dec. 2017, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia. (pp. 171-179). Retrieved from http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/58779
Ristanto, R. H., & Darmawan, E. (2020). Biology reading literacy: Measurement and empowerment through CIRC learning model. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1305-1318. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.679378
Ristanto, R., & Darmawan, E. (2020). Biology reading literacy: measurement and empowerment through circ learning model. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1305-1318. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.679378
Sahyar, S., Bunawan, W., Rangkuti, M. A., Yanti, J. (2019). High-level comprehension skill by using competencies pisa in indonesia's education system. Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2019). Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/aisteel-19/125928493
Sakkir, G., & Haturrahma, M. (2023). The challenges in teaching writing through cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) Strategy. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 391-396. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum1971
Saputri, N. W., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2022). Mathematical modeling learning design with PISA framework on grade X function. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(3), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.3.17228.289-302
Sempé, L. (2021). School-level inequality measurement based categorical data: a novel approach applied to PISA. Large-scale Assess Educ, 9, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00103-7
Setyowati, A. J. Sainda, A.T.T., Rozzana, A. G., Fitriah, A.A., Savitri, A., Putri, A. W., Mufida, A., Millenium, B. B. A., Dahlia, D. I., Widaad, E. R. (2024). Metode layanan project based learning terhadap peningkatan motivasi belajar anak di panti asuhan. Proceedings Series of Educational Studies. Retrieved from http://conference.um.ac.id/index.php/pses/article/view/9587
Situmorang, R.P., Suwi, E., & Nugroho, F.A. (2019). Contextual learning: implementation and challenges for science teacher in private middle school. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.30870/JPPI.V5I1.3881
Smiley, J. (2020). Context based learning in the high school chemistry classroom : pros, cons, & obstacles. (Published Master Thesis), Ball State University, Indiana, Unites Stated. Retrieved from http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/20.500.14291/202266
Suryahadikusumah, A. R., Alam, I. N., Triana, D., & Nurmalasari, Y. (2024). Effectiveness of self-help books for improving santris’ mental health literacy. Pamomong: Journal of Islamic Educational Counseling, 5(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.18326/pamomong.v5i1.925
Ugwuanyi, C., & Nwagbo, C. (2012). Challenges to effective utilization of information and communication technology in teaching and learning. Global journal for research analysis, 3, 48-50. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778160%2FAPR2014%2F17
Ulrich, C. (2012). Who’s afraid of ubiquity? opportunities and challenges of project-based learning in school contexts. 8th International Conference eLearning and Software for Education, 1, 365-370. https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-12-059
Williams, M. (2015). STEM Literacy: Challenges implementing ‘E’ in local texas-STEM academies. 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344061
Wu, H., Saleh, A.R. & Molnár, G. (2022). Inductive and combinatorial reasoning in international educational context: assessment, measurement invariance, and latent mean differences. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09750-z
Xu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020). Applying Thematic Analysis to Education: A Hybrid Approach to Interpreting Data in Practitioner Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810
Yang, W., & Fan, G. (2019). Post-PISA education reforms in china: policy response beyond the digital governance of PISA. ECNU Review of Education, 2(3), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531119878557
Yıldırım, B. (2016). An analyses and meta-synthesis of research on stem education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 23-33. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126734
Yulianti, D., Khanafiyah, S., & Sulistyorini, S. (2016). Inquiry-based science comic physics series integrated with character education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 38-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5787
Zainudin, A.R., Vianty, M., & Inderawati, R. (2019). The practice and challenges of implementing critical thinking skills in efl teachers questioning behavior. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2112
Zakaria, G. A. N., & Mahalle , S. (2024). The urgency of educational technology in islamic education. Ar-Fachruddin: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.7401/s5bc5h23
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.