The Quality of Teaching Digitalization in Primary School Context and Its Relationship to Leadership and Work Motivation
Abstract
The Quality of Teaching Digitalization in Primary School Context and Its Relationship to Leadership and Work Motivation. Objectives: This research aims to determine the influence of principal leadership and teacher work motivation on the quality of digitalization of teaching. Methods: This research method is quantitative causal comparative with teacher and school principal participants. Population 403 people, research sample 200 people with simple random sampling. The instrument has passed the validity test, reliability test and prerequisite test. Hypothesis testing uses correlation tests and analysis of variance. Findings: The research results show that there is a positive influence of the principal's leadership on the quality of teaching digitalization, there is a positive influence of teacher work motivation on the quality of teaching digitalization, and there is a joint positive influence of the principal's leadership and teacher work motivation on the quality of teaching digitalization. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the results of this research reaffirm how important the role of school principal leadership and teacher work motivation is in realizing teaching quality.
Keywords: digitalization school management, digitizing schools work, supportive leadership, intrinsic motivation, digital scholarship.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v14.i2.202474
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aesaert, K., Van Braak, J., Van Nijlen, D., & Vanderlinde, R. (2015). Primary school pupils’ ICT competences: Extensive model and scale development. Computers and Education, 81, 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.021.
Azlifa, M., & Saeed, F. (2021). The challenges to digitalization of schools in the Maldives 58 The Challenges to Digitalization of Schools in the Maldives. International Journal of Social Research and Innovation, 5(2), 57–76.
Bejinaru, R. (2019). Impact of digitalization on education in the knowledge economy. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 367–380.
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Digital competences and long-term ICT integration in school culture: The perspective of elementary school leaders. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9456-7.
Boronenko, T., Kaysina, A., & Fedotova, V. (2020). The School Innovative Educational Model: Issues of Digitalization.
Calero, J., & Ferrà, J. O. E. (2014). Recursos escolares y resultados de la educación. Fundación Europea Sociedad y Educación.
Chen, L.-K., Dorn, E., Sarakatsannis, J., & Wiesinger, A. (2021). Teacher survey: Learning loss is global—and significant. Public & Social Sector Practice. McKinsey & Company, 1999–2003.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
Colombo, M. (2016). Introduction to the Special Section. The Digitalization of Education Practices: How Much and What Kind? Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(2), 2016. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2016-2-1.
De Clercq, M., Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2021). Profiles of teachers’ striving and wellbeing: evolution and relations with context factors, retention, and professional engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000702.
Dexter, S. (2008). Leadership for IT in schools. International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, 543–554.
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882.
Frolova, E. V, Rogach, O. V, & Ryabova, T. M. (2020). Digitalization of education in modern scientific discourse: new trends and risks analysis. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.2.313.
Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested. Computers and Education, 67, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.007.
Genlott, A. A., Grönlund, Å., Viberg, O., & Andersson, A. (2023). Leading dissemination of digital, science-based innovation in school–a case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4171–4181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1955272.
Glover, I., Hepplestone, S., Parkin, H. J., Rodger, H., & Irwin, B. (2016). Pedagogy first: realising technology enhanced learning by focusing on teaching practice. In British Journal Of Educational Technology (Vol. 47, Issue 5). http://shura.shu.ac.uk/11879/.
Griban, O., Griban, I., & Korotun, A. (2019). Modern teacher under the conditions of digitalization of education. Advance in Economics, Business and Management, 605–608.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge.
Hauge, T. E. (2014). Uptake and use of technology: Bridging design for teaching and learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.942750.
Herzberg, F. (2017). Motivation to work. Routledge.
Jedeskog, G. (2007). work in the teachers’ world. In Seminar.net-International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning (Vol. 3).
Jeong, D. W., Moon, H., Jeong, S. M., & Moon, C. J. (2024). Digital capital accumulation in schools, teachers, and students and academic achievement: Cross-country evidence from the PISA 2018. International Journal of Educational Development, 107, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103024.
Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Shin, E. K. (2017). Students’ expectation, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use digital textbooks. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.025.
Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000133.
Klaassen, J., & Löwstedt, J. (2020). Digitalization in schools: four examples of embeddedness. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 28, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620200000028004.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583.
Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis ofstudies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.010.
Lazarides, R., & Schiefele, U. (2021). Teacher motivation: Implications for instruction and learning. Introduction to the special issue. Learning and Instruction, 76, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101543.
Levatino, A., Ferrer-Esteban, G., & Verger, A. (2024). Unveiling teachers’ work preferences: A conjoint experiment on the implications of school governance reform across three countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 146, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104631.
Levy, A., DeLeon, I. G., Martinez, C. K., Fernandez, N., Gage, N. A., Sigurdsson, S. Ó., & Frank-Crawford, M. A. (2017). A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.359.
Lindqvist, H., & Pettersson, F. (2018). Leading For Digitalization: Exploring The Leadership Perspective. International Conference on Information Communication Technologies (ICICTE), 371–381. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-151165.
Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2013). Digital literacies as situated knowledge practices: Academics’ influence on learners’ behaviours. In Literacy in the digital university (pp. 126–136). Routledge.
Luthans, F. (2005). Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill. In International Edition. Managment Series. New York.
Machekhina, O. N. (2017). Digitalization of education as a trend of its modernization and reforming La digitalización de la educación como tendencia de su modernización y reforma. In Pág (Vol. 38).
Mintrop, R., & Ordenes, M. (2017). Motivação dos professores para trabalhar na era dos incentivos extrínsecos extrínsecos: Metas de desempenho e compromissos pró-sociais ao serviço da equidade. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2482.
Muhdi, M., & Nurkolis, N. (2020). The Implementation of E-Learning in Raudhatul Athfal and Madrasah During The Covid-19 Pandemic in Central Java. Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 15(1), 57–78.
Muhdi, Nurkolis, & Yuliejantiningsih, Y. (2020). The Implementation of Online Learning in Early Childhood Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 14(2), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.142.04.
Navaridas-Nalda, F., Clavel-San Emeterio, M., Fernández-Ortiz, R., & Arias-Oliva, M. (2020). The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481.
Nelson, L., Arthur, E. J., Jensen, W. R., & Van Horn, G. (2011). Trading Textbooks for Technology New Opportunities for Learning An Indiana school district tries digital textbooks and finds many advantages. www.cast.org.
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
OECD. (2016). School Leadership for Learning: Insight from TALIS 2013 (TALIS). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258341-en.
Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2016). Enquiry into the side effects of school inspection in a ‘low-stakes’ inspection context. Research Papers in Education, 31(4), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1076886.
Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8.
Polikarpova, E. V, Shipelik, O. V, & Krylova, I. V. (2020). Digitalization of education: save the human. International Scientific Conference “Digitalization of Education: History, Trends and Prospects”(DETP 2020), 648–654.
Rastogi, H. (2019). Digitalization of Education in India -An Analysis. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), 160–167. http://ijrar.com/
Sailer, M., Maier, R., Berger, S., Kastorff, T., & Stegmann, K. (2024). Learning activities in technology-enhanced learning: A systematic review of meta-analyses and second-order meta-analysis in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102446.
Schwab, K. (2019). Revolusi Industri Keempat [Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Senden, B., Nilsen, T., & Blömeke, S. (2022). Instructional Quality: A Review of Conceptualizations, Measurement Approaches, and Research Findings. In Ways of Analyzing Teaching Quality (pp. 140–172). Scandinavian University Press. https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215045054-2021-05.
Simamora, B. (2004). Marketing Research Philosophy, Theory and Application. In Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Skobeltsina, K., Beshenkov, S., & Kuznetsov, A. (2021). Education systems management in critical situations: potential risks of digitalization. XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021” Precision Agriculture and Agricultural Machinery Industry, Volume 2, 739–749.
Sugiyono. (2015a). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&d [quantitative qualitative research methods and R&D]. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2015b). Metode penelitian manajemen [management research methods] (4th ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Szyszka, M., Tomczyk, Ł., & Kochanowicz, A. M. (2022). Digitalisation of schools from the perspective of teachers’ opinions and experiences: the frequency of ICT Use in Education, Attitudes towards New Media, and Support from Management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148339.
Wang, Ni, X., Zhang, M., & Zhang, J. (2024). Educational digital inequality: A meta-analysis of the relationship between digital device use and academic performance in adolescents. Computers and Education, 213, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105003.
Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Exploring the relationship between educational ICT resources, student engagement, and academic performance: A multilevel structural equation analysis based on PISA 2018 data. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 79, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101308.
Zancajo, A., Verger, A., & Bolea, P. (2022). Digitalization and beyond: the effects of Covid-19 on post-pandemic educational policy and delivery in Europe. Policy and Society, 41(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puab016.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.