Enhancing Information Literacy Skills through Think Talk Write Online Learning Model

Reza Saeful Rachman, Vismaia Sabariah Damaianti, Yeti Mulyati, Andoyo Sastromiharjo

Abstract


Abstract: Enhancing Information Literacy Skills through Think Talk Write Online Learning Model. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model which is carried out online on students information literacy skills at the tertiary level. Method: This study used a quasi-experimental method with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The research was conducted on students of Indonesia University of Education social studies program with a total of 250 people consisting of 125 people in the experimental group and 125 people in the control group. Findings: The results showed that Think, talk, and write activities have an impact on providing students with opportunities to read, process, and utilize various information. Conclusion: The conclusion is that the application of the TTW learning model has a higher effectiveness than the application of conventional learning models in terms of achieving student information literacy.

Keywords: information literacy, Think Talk Write, online learning.

Abstrak: Meningkatkan Keterampilan Literasi Informasi melalui Model Pembelajaran Online Think Talk Write. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keefektifan model pembelajaran Think Talk Write (TTW) yang dilakukan secara online terhadap kemampuan literasi informasi siswa di tingkat perguruan tinggi. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Penelitian dilakukan pada mahasiswa program studi Sosial di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dengan jumlah 250 orang yang terdiri dari 125 orang pada kelompok eksperimen dan 125 orang pada kelompok kontrol. Temuan: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelas yang menerapkan pembelajaran TTW memiliki rata-rata nilai posttest literasi informasi yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelas konvensional. Kegiatan berpikir, berbicara, dan menulis berdampak pada pemberian kesempatan kepada siswa untuk membaca, mengolah, dan memanfaatkan berbagai informasi. Kesimpulan: Kesimpulannya adalah penerapan model pembelajaran TTW memiliki efektivitas yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan penerapan model pembelajaran konvensional dalam hal pencapaian literasi informasi siswa.

Kata kunci: literasi informasi, Think Talk Write, pembelajaran online.

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i3.202225


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Aufi, A. S., Al-Azri, H. M., & Al-Hadi, N. A. (2017). Perceptions of Information Literacy Skills among Undergraduate Students in the Social Media Environment. International Information and Library Review, 49(3), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2017.1293416

Bruce, C., Edwards, S., & Lupton, M. (2006). Six Frames for Information literacy Education: a conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05010002

Bundy, A. (2002). Growing the community of the informed: Information literacy—a global issue. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 33(3), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2002.10755193

Cruickshank, J. (2019). The Critical Role of Information Retrieval in STEM Information Literacy. Science and Technology Libraries, 38(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2018.1544534

Deyrup, M. M. (2009). Information literacy: Discipline-specific or core competency? Slavic and East European Information Resources, 10(2–3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228880903019353

Erjavec, K., & Volčič, Z. (2010). Information Literacy: A means of preparing the students in Slovenia for the information society. Journal of Children and Media, 4(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903407325

Griffin, K. L., & Ramachandran, H. (2010). Science education and information literacy: A grass-roots effort to support science literacy in schools. Science and Technology Libraries, 29(4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2010.522945

Hadianto, D., S. Damaianti, V., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2022). Effectiveness of Literacy Teaching Design Integrating Local Culture Discourse and Activities to Enhance Reading Skills. Cogent Education, 9(1), 0–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2016040

Khan, M. L., & Idris, I. K. (2019). Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: a reasoned action and information literacy perspective. Behaviour and Information Technology, 38(12), 1194–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1578828

Lantz, A., & Brage, C. (2006). Towards a Learning Society — Exploring the Challenge of Applied Information Literacy through Reality-Based Scenarios. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05010003

Lecea, M., & Perez-Stable, M. A. (2019). Success of reiterative instruction: Looking at faculty-librarian collaboration to improve information literacy in political science education. College and Undergraduate Libraries, 26(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2019.1575305

Lupton, M. (2008). Evidence, argument and social responsibility: First-year students’ experiences of information literacy when researching an essay. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(4), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802406858

Marfleet, B. G., Dille, B. J., & Dille, B. J. (2005). Information literacy and the undergraduate research methods curriculum. Journal of Political Science Education, 1(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160590961793

McClaren, M. (2019). Revisioning environmental literacy in the context of a global information and communications ecosphere. Journal of Environmental Education, 50(4–6), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1687408

Neely-Sardon, A., & Tignor, M. (2018). Focus on the facts: A news and information literacy instructional program. Reference Librarian, 59(3), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2018.1468849

O’Brien, T., & Russell, P. (2012). The Irish ‘Working Group on Information Literacy’ – Edging towards a national policy. International Information and Library Review, 44(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2012.10762909

Schlesselman-Tarango, G. (2014). Cyborgs in the Academic Library: A Cyberfeminist Approach to Information Literacy Instruction. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 33(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.872529

Shane, J. M. Y., & Shane, J. M. Y. (2005). Formal and Informal Structures for Collaboration on a Campus-Wide Information Literacy Program. Resource Sharing and Information Networks, 17(1–2), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1300/J121v17n01_08

Špiranec, S., & Pejova, Z. (2010). Information literacy in South-East Europe: Formulating strategic initiatives, making reforms and introducing best practices. International Information and Library Review, 42(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2010.10762848

Sturtevant, E. G., & Kim, G. S. (2010). Literacy motivation and school/non-school literacies among students enrolled in a middle-school esol program. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802716907

Swanson, T. A. (2005). Applying a Critical Pedagogical Perspective to Information Literacy Standards. Community & Junior College Libraries, 12(4), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J107v12n04_08

Whitehurst, A. P. (2010). Information literacy and global readiness: Library involvement can make a world of difference. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 29(3), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2010.508678

Whitworth, A. (2006). Communicative competence in the information age: Towards a critical theory of information literacy education. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05010007


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.