Email this article Junior High School Students' Understanding of The Nature of Science
Abstract
Abstract: Junior high school students’ understanding of the nature of science. Objective: The purpose of this research is to explore the junior high school students' understanding of nature of science (NOS). Methods: The survey in this research was conducted in 8th grade as many as 80 students from three schools in East Prabumulih Sub-District, South Sumatera Province, Indonesia, which was determined by stratified random sampling technique. Students' understanding of 7 aspects of NOS was measured using a questionnaire containing 35 items consisting of 4 Likert scale statements (scale 1-5) and 1 question open-ended responses to each aspect of NOS. Findings: The results showed that students’ understanding of NOS is still inadequate. The students' understanding of NOS that inadequate shown through by the small percentage of the informed view category on all aspects of the NOS measured, both Likert scale items and open-ended responses. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the need for learning to improve understanding of NOS for students.
Keywords: nature of science, survey method, students understanding.
Abstrak: Pemahaman siswa SMP mengenai hakikat sains. Tujuan: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi pemahaman siswa SMP mengenai hakikat sains (NOS). Metode: Survei pada penelitian ini dilakukan kepada siswa kelas 8 sebanyak 80 siswa dari tiga sekolah di Kecamatan Prabumulih Timur, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia, yang ditentukan dengan teknik stratified random sampling. Pemahaman siswa pada 7 aspek NOS diukur menggunakan kuesioner berisi 35 item yang terdiri atas 4 pernyataan skala likert (skala 1-5) dan 1 pertanyaan open-ended responses tiap aspek NOS. Temuan: Hasil menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman siswa mengenai NOS masih belum baik. Pemahaman NOS siswa yang masih belum baik ditunjukkan melalui persentase kategori informed view pada semua aspek NOS yang diukur sangat kecil, baik item skala likert maupun open-ended responses. Kesimpulan: Temuan ini menekankan perlunya dilakukan pembelajaran yang meningkatkan pemahaman NOS pada siswa.
Kata kunci: hakikat sains, metode survei, pemahaman siswa.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akerson, V. L., Carter, I., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2019). Teaching and Learning Nature of Science in Elementary Classrooms: Research-Based Strategies for Practical Implementation. Science & Education, 28, 391-411. DOI: 10.1007/s11191-019-00045-1.
Akerson, V. L., Buck, G. A., Donelly, L. A., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I. S. (2011). The Importance of Teaching and Learning Nature of Science in the Early Childhood Years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 537-549. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-011-9312-5.
Das, P. M., Faikhamta, C., & Punsuvon, V. (2017). Bhutanese Students’ Views of Nature of Science: a Case Study of Culturally Rich Country. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 391-412. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-017-9611-9.
Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish Grade 10 Students’ and Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A National Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083-1112. DOI 10.1002/tea.20243.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGram-Hill.
Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., Owens, D. C., Oertli, R. T., & Zangori, L. A. (2019). Exploring the Complexity of Students ’ Scientific Explanations and Associated Nature of Science Views Within a Place-Based Socioscientific Issue Context. Science & Education, 28, 329–366. DOI: 10.1007/s11191-019-00034-4.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362, DOI: 10.1080/09500690601007549.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific Literacy : New Minds for a Changing World. Science Education, 82(3), 407-416. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3< 407::AID-SCE6>3.3. CO:2-Q.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Khishfe, R., Alshaya, F. S., BouJaoude, S., Mansour, N., & Alrudiyan, K. I. (2017). Students’ Understandings of Nature of Science and Their Arguments in the Context of Four Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 299-334. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1280741.
Khishfe, R. (2017). Consistency of Nature of Science Views Across Scientific and Socio-Scientific Contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4), 403-432. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1287976.
Khishfe, R. (2014). Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 974-1016. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.832004.
Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of Science and Decision-Making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67-100. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.559490.
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2007). Relationship between Instructional Context and Views of Nature of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 939-961. DOI: 10.1080/09500690601110947.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.
Lederman, N., Abd-El-khalick F. (1998). Avoiding De-Natured Science : Activities that Promote Understanding of the Nature of Science. In: McComas W. F. (eds) The Nature of Science Education. Science and Technology Education Library, 83-126. DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47215-5_5.
Maeng, J. L., Bell, R. L., Clair, S. T., Gonczi, A. L., & Whitworth, B. A. (2018). Supporting Elementary Teachers’ Enactment of Nature of Science Instruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Science Education, 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1528643.
Mun, K., Lee, H., Kim, S., Choi, K., Choi, S., & Krajcik, J. (2013). Cross-Cultural Comparison of Perceptions on the Global Scientific Literacy With Australian, Chinese, and Korean Middle School Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 437-465.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: Snapshot of Students’ Performance in Reading, Mathematics, and Science. Retrieved 15 January, 2020 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-results_ENGLISH.png.
Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science. Science Education, 76(6), 559-580.
Sangsa-ard, R., Thathong, K., & Chapoo, S. (2014). Examining Grade 9 Students’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 382-388.
Wati, F., Sinaga, P., & Priyandoko, D. (2017). Science Literacy: How do High School Student Solve PISA Test Items?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 1-6.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.