Email this article Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Minat Belajar Biologi Siswa Lintas Minat
Abstract
This quasy Experiment research aims to determine the influence of guided inquiry learning model toward the interest of biology students learning cross-interest involving 66 high school students in Tenggarong Seberang. The research design used non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The data analysis of the increase of students' learning interest in the application of this learning model was obtained from the mean of N-Gain, while the influence of inquiry learning model was guided against the interest of learning done through t-test for normal distributed data and Mann-Whitney U-test for abnormally distributed data. Based on data analysis, it was found that biology learning interest score after learning process in experiment and control class was significantly different (sig. (2-tailed) <0.05). In addition, there was an increase in student interest in the low category but significantly different (U-test = 257.0 <U-table = 818).
Keyword: Guided inquiry, cross-interest, learning interest.
Penelitian Quasy Experiment ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap minat belajar biologi siswa lintas minat yang melibatkan 66 siswa SMA di Tenggarong Seberang. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. Analisis data peningkatan minat belajar siswa pada penerapan model pembelajaran ini diperoleh dari rerata N-Gain, sedangkan pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap minat belajar dilakukan melalui t-test untuk data yang berdistribusi normal dan uji Mann-Whitney U-test untuk data yang berdistribusi tidak normal. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, diperoleh bahwa skor minat belajar biologi setelah proses pembelajaran pada kelas eksperimen dan kontrol berbeda nyata (sig.(2-tailed)< 0,05). Selain itu, terjadi peningkatan minat belajar siswa dengan kategori rendah namun berbeda nyata (U-test = 257,0 < U-tabel =818).
Kata Kunci: Inkuiri terbimbing, lintas minat, minat belajar.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Archambault, J. (2008). “The Effect of Developing Kinematics Concepts GraphicallyPrior to Introducing Algebraic Problem Solving Techniques”.Action Research Reguared for the Master of Natural Science Degree with Concentration in Physics. United State: Arizona State University.
Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & Cartier, S. C. (2013). Layers of Self- and Co-Regulation: Teachers Working Collaboratively to Support Adolescents' Self-Regulated Learning through Reading. Education Research International, 2013, 1-19.
Canrinus, E.T, Helms-Lorentz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2012). Self-Efficacy, Job Satisfaction, Motivation and Commitment: Exploring The Relationships Between Indicators of Teachers’ Professional Identity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 115–132.
Dybowski, C., & Harendza, S. (2015). Validation of The Physician Teaching Motivation Questionnaire (PTMQ). BMC Medical Education, 2015, 1-12.
Fakayode, S. O. (2014). Guided-Inqury Laboratory Experiments in The analytical Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 40(6), 1267-1271.
Hartini, T. I., Kusdiwelirawan, A., dan Fitriana, Intan. (2014). Pengaruh Berpikir Kreatif dengn Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika Siswa dengan Menggunakan Tes Open Ended. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3 (1), 8-11.
Hermawati, Ni Wayan Manik. (2012). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Biologi Dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Sma Ditinjau Dari Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA 2(2), 1–30.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Golan Duncan, R., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problembased and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Hurlock, Elizabeth. (1995). Psikologi Perkembangan. Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan (Terjemahan). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Karthwohl, David R., Crikshank, Kathleen A, Raths, J., Pintrich, Paul R., Airasian, Peter W., Anderson, Lorin W., Mayer, Richard E., & Wittorck, Merlin C. (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing (A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Newyork: Pearson Education (US).
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718.
Meliawati, Triastono, and Masjhudi. (2016). Survei Pelaksanaan Lintas Minat Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi Beserta Analisis Kendala Pelaksanaan Di Sma Negeri se-Kota Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang, 1(1), 1–10.
Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The Relationsip Between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: Posisible “Hidden Variable” in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. American Journal of Physics,70(7), 1259-1268.
Moote, Julie. (2017). Investigating the Longer-Term Impact of the CREST Inquiry-Based Learning Programme on Student Self-regulated Processes and Related Motivations: Views of Students and Teachers. Research Science Education, (july 2017), 1-30.
Muldayanti, N. D. (2013). Pembelajaran Biologi Model STAD dan TGT Ditinjau dari Keingintahuan dan Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 12-17.
Roll, Ido, Butler, D., Yee, N., Welsh, A., Perez, S., Briseno, A., Perkins, K., & Bonn, D. (2018). Understanding the Impact of Guiding Inquiry: The Relationship Between Directive Support, Student Attributes, and Transfer of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors in Inquiry Learning. Instructional Science (2018), 46, 77-104.
Rotgans, J. I., and Schmidt, G. H., (2011). Cognitive Engagement in The Problem-Based Learning Classroom. Advances in Health Science Education, (2011), 16, 465-479.
Seraphin, K.D., Philippoff, J., Parisky, A., Degnan, K., and Warren, D.P. (2001). Teaching Energy Science as Inquiry: Reflection on Professional Development as a Tool to Build Inquiry Teaching Skills for Middle and High School Teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 235-251.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabeta.
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.