Prospective Teachers’ Commognitive: The Pedagogical Knowledge in Designing Mathematics Class for Proving Trigonometric Identity
Abstract
Abstract: This research aims to describe the pedagogical commognitive framework of prospective teachers in designing and teaching mathematics class for trigonometric identity sub materials. This type of research is qualitative research with a descriptive approach. Determination of the subject in this study using a purposive sampling technique. The subjects of this study were prospective teacher students who were undergoing microteaching learning. The pedagogical skills would be observed from their design and teaching practices activities which consist of the introduction activities, main activities, and closing activities. Researchers tried to combine commognitive and pedagogical knowledge to analyze the data. There are four components of commognitive were used in pedagogical knowledge. Those are word use, visual mediator, routine, and narratives. The main instrument in this study is the researcher himself because the researcher himself is planning, implementing, collecting data during the research through recording video and audio learning, observing, or interviewing the subject and reporting the results of the study. Word use is used as a keyword and the initial information given to students in accordance with the material to be taught. The use of the word use component is done by means of spoken orally. Visual mediators used in learning activities are prospective teacher students using laptop and blackboard media in explaining learning material, giving examples of questions, and several other learning activities. The method that prospective teacher students use in presenting material using sample questions, reminding the previous material, in providing understanding to new students then forming a conclusion (inductive approach). In addition, prospective teacher students provide understanding and focus on the concepts of the material being taught then provide questions, questions, and exercises in supporting student understanding (deductive approach).
Keywords: pedagogical commognitive, designing mathematics, prospective teachers, trigonometric identity.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp946-960
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Auerbach, A. J. J., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Pedagogical knowledge for active-learning instruction in large undergraduate biology courses: a large-scale qualitative investigation of instructor thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0112-9
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Berger, M. (2013). Examining mathematical discourse to understand in-service teachers’ mathematical activities. Pythagoras. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v34i1.197
Brendefur, J., & Frykholm, J. (2000). promoting mathematical communication in the classroom: two preservice teachers’ conceptions and practices.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design. SAGE Publications.
Grossman, P. L., & Richert, A. E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90024-8
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600210000051
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning.
Hudson, P. (2007). Examining mentors’ practices for enhancing preservice teachers’ pedagogical development in mathematics and science. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 5, 201–217.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2013.11.004
Leinhardt, G. (1990). Capturing Craft Knowledge in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 18–25. http://er.aera.net
Moschkovich, J. N. (2024). Language and learning mathematics: A sociocultural approach to academic literacy in mathematics. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 459–472.
Mosvold, R. (2016). The work of teaching mathematics from a commognitive perspective. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290812976
Mosvold, R., & Fauskanger, J. (2014). Common tasks of teaching as a resource for measuring professional content knowledge internationally. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267325654
Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of Calculus. Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918338
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=16909
Ngin, C. S. (2018). Examining a teacher’s use of multiple representations in the teaching of percentages: a commognitive perspective. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia., 591–598.
OECD. (2022). Education at a Glance 2022. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/3197152b-en
OECD. (2023). Regional outlook 2023 policy highlights the longstanding geography of inequalities. https://www.oecd.org/
Rahmah, M. A. (2017). Inductive-deductive approach to improve mathematical problem solving for junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012089
Robutti, O., Sabena, C., Krause, C., Soldano, C., & Arzarello, F. (2022). Gestures in mathematics thinking and learning. In Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics (Vols. 2–2, pp. 685–726). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03945-4_8
Rodgers, C. R., & Raider-Roth, M. B. (2006). Presence in teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600 500467548
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? a story of research and practice, productively intertwined. In Educational Researcher (Vol. 43, Issue 8, pp. 404–412). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554450
Sfard, A. (2008). Learning in doing: social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884 MCA0801_04
Shabtay, G., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2017). Teachers’ Discourse On Students’ Conceptual Understanding And Struggle. Conference: The 41th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. The Higher Education Academy, 4(2), 24–250.
Talbert-Johnson, C. (2006). Preparing highly qualified teacher candidates for urban schools: The importance of dispositions. Education and Urban Society, 39(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124506293321
Tuset, G. A. (2018). A commognitive lens to study pre-service teachers ’ teaching in the context of achieving a goal of ambitious mathematics teaching. Proceeding, Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 2008.
Viirman, O. (2014). The functions of function discourse-university mathematics teaching from a commognitive standpoint. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(4), 512–527. doi.org/10.1080/0020739X. 2013.855328
Viseu, F., & Oliveira, I. B. (2012). Open-ended tasks in the promotion of classroom communication in Mathematics. international electronic journal of elementary education.
wanjiru, b., & o-connor, m. (2015). effects of Mathematical Vocabulary Instruction on Students’ Achievement in Mathematics in Secondary Schools of Murang’a County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 201–207. www.iiste.org
Yulistiani, S. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran matematika berbantu sofware prezi dengan pendekatan kontekstual pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar kelas VIII Semester II. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7, 84–93.
Zayyadi, M. (2020). Content and pedagogical knowledge of prospective teachers in mathematics learning: commognitive framework. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 515–532. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.642131
Zayyadi, M., & Lanya, H. (2023). Questions used by novice and experienced teacher in intervening mathematics class interactions. Journal of Honai Math, 6(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v6i2.411
Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., Sulandra, I. M., & As’ari, A. R. (2019). Exploring prospective student teacher’s question on mathematics teaching practice. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.465
Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., & Lanya, H. (2022). The commognitive perspective of teaching skills of prospective mathematics teachers in microteaching subjects. Jurnal Elemen, 8(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4129
Zayyadi, M., & Pratiwi, E. (2022). Berpikir dan komunikasi dalam kerangka commognitive. Bandar Publishing.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.