Discovery Learning Model Assisted by Geogebra-based Napier Bones on Students’ Division Problem Solving Ability
Abstract
Abstract: Problem-solving ability is a basis that students must have in the learning process. This research aims to analyze the influence of the Discovery Learning model with Geogebra-based Napier Bones on improving students' division problem-solving ability. The population in this study was fourth-grade students of SDN Gugus Diponegoro. Sampling was done using the cluster random sampling technique. The sample in this research was fourth-grade students of SDN 1 Kalen and SDN 2 Nglandeyan. This research was carried out using quantitative research methods with experimental research types. The research design used a Quasi-experimental design. Data collection in this research was carried out by test techniques. The data analysis techniques used were normality test, homogeneity test, independent t test, and N-gain. The result of the research showed that there was a difference in division problem-solving ability in the experimental class which is higher than the control class. Based on the independent sample t-test, the significance value obtained 0,038 < 0,05. The N-Gain results show that the value in the experimental class was 0.501, which is in the medium category, while the value of the control class was 0.235 in the low category. This research concludes that the Discovery Learning model with Geogebra-based Napier Bones media has a significant influence on students' division problem-solving abilities.
Keywords: discovery learning, geogebra-based napier bones, problem solving ability.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i1.pp223-235
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aeni, N., Budiamin, A., & Muhtar, F. (2023). Implementation of learning theory of constructivism perspective jean piaget (1896-1980) in PAI Learning at SDI Bilal Bin Robah Batulayar Village, Batulayar District. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 5219–5229. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.7163
Andrillah, A. D., Sayidiman, S., & Nurhaedah, N. (2023). The effect of using the napier rod props on the mathematics learning outcomes of class iv student’s of elementary school. International Journal of Elementary School Teacher, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijest.v2i2.41094
Armin, R., & Ulu, N. L. La. (2022). Pengaruh penggunaan alat peraga batang napier terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas 4 sd negeri 2 bataraguru [the effect of using napier bones props on mathematics learning achievement of grade 4 students of SD Negeri 2 Bataraguru]. Jurnal Akademik Pendidikan Matematika, 8(20), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.55340/japm.v8i2.881
Arruan, P. F. (2023). Difficulty of solving problems story solved. TEFL Overseas Journal, 11(2), 43–49.
Ellah, B. O., Achor, E. E., & Enemarie, V. (2019). Problem-solving skills as correlates of attention span and working memory of low ability level students in senior secondary schools. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 6(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2019.63.135.141
Ellizar, E., Hardeli, H., Beltris, S., & Suharni, R. (2018). Development of scientific approach based on discovery learning module. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012101
Erman, Y., Lena, M., Ahmad, S., & Helsa, Y. (2019). Discovery learning models and math mathematics concepts understanding. Sciences and Technology (GCSST), 2, 209–213.
Feruza, O. O., & Sharofutdinova, S. (2020). The development of logical thinking of primary school students in mathematics. European Journal of Research and Reflection Educational Sciences, 8(2), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.52376/978-5-907419-23-0_056
Filiz, A., & Gür, H. (2024). Examples of the use of mathematics history in mathematics teaching: ascalon multiplication method, gelosia multiplication method and napier’s rods method. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(2), 878–908. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1363577
Gardner, M. (2020). Knotted doughnuts and other mathematical entertainments. American Mathematical Soc.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Ibrokhimovich, F., & Abduraxmonova, M. (2022). Teaching mathematics in elementary school: issues and solutions. Eurasian Journal of Learning and Academic Teaching, 4(January), 84–87.
Inde, K. H., Kaleka, M. B. U., & Ilyas, I. (2020). The effect of discovery learning model on learning outcome of grade-vii students of smpn 5 Nangapanda. Journal of Science Education Research, 4(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v4i1.34233
Jawad, L. F., Majeed, B. H., & Alrikabi, H. T. S. (2021). The impact of teaching by using stem approach in the development of creative thinking and mathematical achievement among the students of the fourth scientific class. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(13), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i13.24185
Kale, V., Kakad, S., Kakare, A., Kalokhe, A., & Yewale, A. (2023). The evolution of computers. International Conference on Communication and Information Processing, 1–9.
Kamid, Ramalisa, Y., Fajriah, N., Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., Putri, F. I., Prameswari, N., & Fadillah, A. (2024). Mathematics learning innovation for student mathematics process skills in higher grade of elementary schools. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, 29(1), 67–76.
Mokotjo, L. G., & Mokhele, M. L. (2021). Challenges of integrating geogebra in the teaching of mathematics in south african high schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(5), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090509
Moneva, J. C., Miralles, R. G., & Rosell, J. Z. (2020). Problem Solving Attitude and Critical Thinking Ability of Students. International Journal of Research -Granthaalayah, 8(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i1.2020.261
Murni, V., Sariyasa, S., & Ardana, I. M. (2017). GeoGebra assist discovery learning model for problem solving ability and attitude toward mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012049
Nasution, A. G. J. (2022). Pengaruh model discovery learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika peserta didik kelas iv mis istiqomah islamic fullday school kec. Sunggal kab. Deli serdang [the effect of the discovery learning model on the mathematical problem solving ability of class IV Students of MIS Istiqomah Islamic Fullday School Kec. Sunggal Kab. Deli Serdang]. NIZHAMIYAH, 12(1), 65–87.
Nurlina, Nurfadilah, & Bahri, A. (2021). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran [learning theory and learning process] Makassar: LPP Unismuh Makassar.
Pacelli, T., Pellegrino, C., Carotenuto, G., & Coppola, C. (2022). Quality of students ’ explanations in describing multiplication algorithms : the case of Napier bones. Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12), Bozen-Bolzano, Italy. hal-03746003
Rahma, A., & Masniladevi, M. (2020). Pengaruh model discovery learning terhadap pemahaman konsep perkalian dan pembagian pecahan kelas V SD [the influence of discovery learning model on understanding the concept of multiplication and division of fractions in class V Elementary School]. E-Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 10(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.24036/e-jipsd.v10i2.10406
Sehic, S. (2020). Redefining the definition of learning from an educational aspect. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 07(06), 6940–6942. https://www.ijirr.com/redefining-definition-learning-educational-aspect
Sergejeva, N., Aboltins, A., Strupule, L., & Aboltina, B. (2018). Mathematical knowledge in elementary school and for future engineers. Engineering for Rural Development, 17, 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N328
Shodiqin, A., Sukestiyarnob, Wardonob, Isnartob, & Utomo, P. W. (2020). Profil pemecahan masalah menurut krulik dan rudnick ditinjau dari kemampuanan wolfram mathematica [profile of problem solving according to krulik and rudnick based on wolfram mathematica proficiency]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES, Indonesia.
Singh, R. K. A., Singh, C. K. S., M. T. M., T., Mostafa, N. A., & Singh, T. S. M. (2018). A review of research on the use of higher order thinking skills to teach writing. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n1p86
Suseelan, M., Chew, C. M., & Chin, H. (2022). Research on mathematics problem solving in elementary education conducted from 1969 to 2021: a bibliometric review. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(4), 1003–1029. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2198
Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2023). Active learning strategies for an effective mathematics teaching and learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13135
Yadav, D. K. (2017). Exact definition of mathematics. International Research Journal of Mathemathics, Engineering and IT, 4(1), 34–42.
Yohanes, B. (2020). Matematika sekolah [school mathematics]. Yogyakarta: Elmatera (Anggota IKAPI).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.