Investigating Students’ Conception of Acid-Base Indicators Using Three Scientific Questions-Enhanced Conceptual Change Model
Abstract
Abstract: Investigating Students’ Conception of Acid-Base Indicators Using Three Scientific Questions-Enhanced Conceptual Change Model. Objectives:The aims of this research is to obtain the results of the analysis process and changes in students' conceptions on acid base indicators concept from the implementation of the conceptual change model enriched with three scientific questions (CCM-EWTSQ). The stages of CCM-EWTSQ are verification of misconceptions, creation of cognitive conflict conditions, providing assistance for equilibration, and reconstruction of final understanding. Methods: The research is using mixed methods which immersed quantitative research into qualitative research. The research subjects were students of the Chemistry Education Study Program, which consisted of four test students on the concept of acid-base indicators. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. Findings: The results of this study are as follows. Based on the results of two misconceptions verification, students found misconceptions about the concept of acid-base indicators (4 students). Each individual (research target) has undergone a process of changing cognition or conception in each stage of the CCM-EWTSQ on concept that students learn. The roadmap of changes in conception from stage to stage of CCM-EWTSQ experienced by each individual cannot be equated. The implementation of CCM-EWTSQ has succeeded in reducing the misconception of prospective chemistry teacher students who have verified misconceptions. Conclusion: Not all individuals who were verified had misconceptions at first and then turned into concept-aware after proceeding with CCM-EWTSQ
Keywords: misconception, CCM-EWTSQ, CCMo, accommodation.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i1.pp341-350
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amponsah, K. D., & Ochonogor, C. E. (2016). Gender differences in constructivist approach to high school learners’comprehension of electrochemistry concepts. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 4, 210-219.
Barke, H. D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2008). Misconceptions in chemistry: Addressing perceptions in chemical education. Springer Science & Business Media.
Belachew, W., Barke, H. D., & Yitbarek, S. (2019). Conceptual change instructional approach through the use of conceptual change texts and pre-service chemistry teachers’ motivation. African Journal of Chemical Education, 9(1).
Çalik, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2007). Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers' conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International journal of science and mathematics education, 5, 1-28.
Chi, M. T. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and the learning outcomes. In International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 49-70). Routledge.
Disessa, A. A. (2002). Why “conceptual ecology” is a good idea. In Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 28-60). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Effendy. (2002). Upaya untuk mengatasi kesalahan konsep dalam pengajaran dengan menggunakan strategi konflik kognitif. Media Komunikasi Kimia, 2(6): 1-19.
Majeed, S., Ahmad, R., & Mazhar, S. (2023). An exploration of students’ common misconceptions in the subject of chemistry at secondary level. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(2), 265-272.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
Muhali, M. (2018, September). Arah pengembangan pendidikan masa kini menurut perspektif revolusi industri 4.0. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala.
Pabuçcu, A., & Geban, O. (2012). Students’ conceptual level of understanding on chemical bonding. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 563-580.
PinarbaŞi, T., Canpolat, N., BayrakÇeken, S., & Geban, Ö. (2006). An investigation of effectiveness of conceptual change text-oriented instruction on students' understanding of solution concepts. Research in Science Education, 36, 313-335.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211-227
Stenhouse, D. (1986). Conceptual change in science education: paradigms and language-games. Science Education, 70(4), 413-25.
Sumarni, W., & Siadi, K. (2012). Keefektifan pereduksian miskonsepsi melalui strategi konflik kognitif pada pemahaman konseptual dan algoritmik. Chemistry In Education, 1(2).
Suyono, H. 2015. Belajar dan pembelajaran teori dan konsep dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suyono, M. (2018). Pengembangan strategi conceptual change untuk meremidiasi miskonsepsi pada mahasiswa calon guru. Laporan Penelitian Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Taber, K. (2002). Chemical misconceptions-preventions, diagnosis and cure: theoritical background. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 297-328.
Ültay, N., Durukan, Ü. G., & Ültay, E. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of conceptual change texts in the REACT strategy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 22-38.
Vosniadou, S. (2007). The cognitive-situative divide and the problem of conceptual change. Educational psychologist, 42(1), 55-66.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.