Decompose The Cognitive Mapping of The PISA Question’s Problem Solving Thinking Structure

Buhaerah Buhaerah Buhaerah, Prayogo Prayogo, Muhammad Ahsanul Haq, Wahab Wahab

Abstract


Abstract: The mistake in problem-solving indicates the presence of the cognitive structure parts, which are problematic. One of the causes is thinking structures that need to be better organized and connected or experience cognitive mistakes. This study aims to describe students' thinking structure mistakes in solving PISA questions and the efforts to correct these mistakes through defragmenting thinking structures. This study uses a qualitative approach. This study uses a qualitative approach, including data reduction, presentation, and conclusion. Based on the results of the study, the mistakes of the students' thinking structures in problem-solving to finish the PISA questions were experienced by all subjects, including students misunderstanding the problem, mistakes in devising a finishing plan, carrying out a finishing plan, and rechecking process. These mistakes are influenced by several reasons, including the need for literacy skills in reading the meaning of the questions, not focusing on essential instructions on the questions, mastery of understanding the concept of prerequisite material, mistakes in operating, and the structured and analysis errors. The defragmenting process is carried out to correct students' thinking structure mistakes in problem-solving through intervention processes including scaffolding-review, scaffolding-restructuring, scaffolding-explaining, cognitive conflict, and dis-equilibration.        

 

Keywords: defragmenting, problem, question, structure, solving, thinking   

 

Abstrak: Kesalahan dalam pemecahan masalah menunjukkan adanya bagian-bagian struktur kognitif yang bermasalah. Salah satu penyebabnya adalah struktur berpikir yang perlu ditata dan terhubung dengan baik atau mengalami kesalahan berpikir. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kesalahan struktur berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA dan upaya memperbaiki kesalahan tersebut melalui defragmentasi struktur berpikir. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Adapun pendekatan kualitatif yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, kesalahan struktur berpikir siswa dalam pemecahan masalah hingga menyelesaikan soal PISA dialami oleh semua mata pelajaran, antara lain siswa salah memahami soal, kesalahan menyusun rencana penyelesaian, melaksanakan rencana penyelesaian, dan proses pengecekan ulang. Kesalahan tersebut dipengaruhi oleh beberapa hal, antara lain perlunya kemampuan literasi dalam membaca makna soal, tidak fokus pada petunjuk esensial soal, penguasaan pemahaman konsep materi prasyarat, kesalahan pengoperasian, serta kesalahan terstruktur dan analisis. Proses defragmenting dilakukan untuk memperbaiki kesalahan struktur berpikir siswa dalam pemecahan masalah melalui proses intervensi meliputi scaffolding-review, scaffolding-restructuring, scaffolding-explaining, kognitif konflik, dan dis-equilibration.   

 

Kata kunci: defragmentasi, masalah, pertanyaan, struktur, pemecahan, pemikiran 


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v24i3.pp603-626


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aidossov, Allayarbek, Galym Aidosov, and Saltanat Narbayeva. 2021. “Construction Of Mathematical Models Of The Stressed-Strained State Of A Material With A Porous Water-Saturated Base Under Dynamic Load.” Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 5(7–113). doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2021.238978.

Allen, Charles E., Mary E. Froustet, John F. LeBlanc, Joseph N. Payne, Anita Priest, Jerry F. Reed, Joan E. Worth, Gladys M. Thomason, Bob Robinson, and Joseph N. Payne. 2020. “National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.” The Arithmetic Teacher 29(5):59. doi: 10.5951/at.29.5.0059.

Andriani, Siti Puri, Triyanto Triyanto, and Farida Nurhasanah. 2021. “DEFRAGMENTATION THINKING STRUCTURE TO OVERCOME ERRORS IN ADDRESSING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM.” AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika 10(1). doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3441.

Anggraini, D., T. A. Kusmayadi, and I. Pramudya. 2018. “The Characteristics of Failure among Students Who Experienced Pseudo Thinking.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1008(1). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012061.

Bernard, M., and W. Setiawan. 2020. “Development of Geometry Analysis Using Geogebra Scripting in Terms of Student Cognitive Capabilities.” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1521.

Corporan, Rosalba Acosta, Azucena Hernández Martín, and Antonio Víctor Martín García. 2021. “Satisfaction of Teachers and Students with the Use of Collaborative Learning Methodologies Mediated by ICT: Two Case Studies.” Estudios Pedagogicos 47(2). doi: 10.4067/S0718-07052021000200079.

Di, Fangfang. 2021. “The Metaphorical Interpretation of English and Chinese Body-Part Idioms Based on Relevance Theory.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 12(5). doi: 10.17507/jltr.1205.24.

Ena, Zubaeda. 2020. “Defragmenting Struktur Berpikir Siswa Dalam Mengonstruksi Konsep Matematika Pada Materi Aljabar Skripsi.”

Feng, Shuo, Huiyu Zhou, and Hongbiao Dong. 2021. “Application of Deep Transfer Learning to Predicting Crystal Structures of Inorganic Substances.” Computational Materials Science 195. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110476.

Fleurence, A., C. C. Lee, R. Friedlein, Y. Fukaya, S. Yoshimoto, K. Mukai, H. Yamane, N. Kosugi, J. Yoshinobu, T. Ozaki, and Y. Yamada-Takamura. 2020. “Emergence of Nearly Flat Bands through a Kagome Lattice Embedded in an Epitaxial Two-Dimensional Ge Layer with a Bitriangular Structure.” Physical Review B 102(20). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.201102.

Green, Brett, and Jeffrey Zwiebel. 2018. “The Hot-Hand Fallacy: Cognitive Mistakes or Equilibrium Adjustments? Evidence from Major League Baseball.” Management Science 64(11). doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2804.

Hadiat, Hanifah Latifah, and Karyati Karyati. 2019. “Hubungan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika, Rasa Ingin Tahu Dan Self-Efficacy Dengan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika.” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika 6(2):200–210. doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.26552.

Haryanti, Suci. 2018. “Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Melalui Metode Defragmenting.” JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika) 3(2):199. doi: 10.30998/jkpm.v3i2.2768.

Irhamna, Irhamna, Zul Amry, and Hermawan Syahputra. 2020. “Contribution of Mathematical Anxiety, Learning Motivation and Self-Confidence to Student’s Mathematical Problem Solving.” Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal 3(4). doi: 10.33258/birle.v3i4.1343.

de Jesús Cázares Balderas, Milagros, David Alfonso Páez, and María Guadalupe Pérez Martínez. 2020. “Theoretical Discussion on Teaching Practices as Mediators in the Development of Metacognitive Strategies for Solving Mathematical Tasks.” Educacion Matematica 32(1).

Jose M Ocampo, Jr. 2018. “Effecting Change on Students?? Critical Thinking in Problem Solving.” Educare 10(2):109–18.

Katrancı, Yasemin, and Sare Şengül. 2020. “The Evaluation of Inquiry Learning Skills towards Math of Middle School Students in Terms of Inquiring, Evaluating, Reasoning, and Reflective-Thinking Skills for Problem-Solving.” TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. doi: 10.15390/eb.2020.7765.

Kiger, Michelle E., Erica Bautista, Thomas M. Bertagnoli, Caitlin E. Hammond, Holly S. Meyer, Lara Varpio, and Ting Dong. 2021. “Defragmenting the Day: The Effect of Full-Day Continuity Clinics on Continuity of Care and Perceptions of Clinic.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 33(5). doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1879652.

Kim, Nam Ju, Brian R. Belland, and Daryl Axelrod. 2019. “Scaffolding for Optimal Challenge in k–12 Problem-Based Learning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 13(1). doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1712.

Kristanto, Bagas Prima, and Tri Nova Hasti Yunianta. 2021. “Development of Media Evaluation of Mathematics Learning Based Applications Quizizz with Problems PISA Content Quantity.” Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 11(02). doi: 10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.12449.

Kumalasari, Fitri, Toto Nusantara, and Cholis Sa’dijah. 2016. “Defragmenting Struktur Berpikir Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Pertidaksamaan Eksponen.” Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan 1(2):246–55.

Kurniati, Dian, Romi Harimukti, and Nur Asiyah Jamil. 2016. “Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP Di Kabupaten Jember Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berstandar PISA.” Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 20(2):142–55. doi: 10.21831/pep.v20i2.8058.

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Vol. 47.

Nurdin, Nurdin, Ita Sarmita Samad, and Sardia Sardia. 2020. “LOGICAL REASONING ANALYSIS BASED ON HIPPOCRATES PERSONALITY TYPES.” Aksioma 9(2). doi: 10.22487/aksioma.v9i2.219.

OECD. 2019. “Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018.” Oecd, 1–10.

Özcan, Zeynep Çiğdem, and Handan Doğan. 2018. “A Longitudinal Study of Early Math Skills, Reading Comprehension and Mathematical Problem Solving.” Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi 8(1). doi: 10.14527/pegegog.2018.001.

Pradana, Dimas Aditya Yudha, and Budi Murtiyasa. 2020. “Kemampuan Siswa Menyelesaikan Masalah Berbentuk Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Penalaran.” Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 15(2):151–64. doi: 10.21831/pg.v15i2.35419.

Pranitasari, Dede, and Novisita Ratu. 2020. “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Pisa Pada Konten Change and Relationship.” AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika 9(4):1235. doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.2685.

Pratiwi, Isnin Cahyo, Siti Inganah, and Octavina Rizky Utami Putri. 2020. “Analysis On Written Mathematical Communication Skills At System Of Linear Equations In Two Variables (SLETV) Material Viewed From Student Learning Styles.” Mathematics Education Journal 3(2). doi: 10.22219/mej.v3i2.11069.

Prayitno, Anton. 2018. “Characteristics of Students’ Critical Thinking In Solving Mathematics Problem.” The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education 8(1):46–55.

Roe, Astrid, Marte Blikstad-Balas, and Cecilie Pedersen Dalland. 2021. “The Impact of COVID-19 and Homeschooling on Students’ Engagement With Physical Activity.” Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 2. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.589227.

Saad, Aslina. 2020. “Students’ Computational Thinking Skill through Cooperative Learning Based on Hands-on, Inquiry-Based, and Student-Centric Learning Approaches.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(1). doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080135.

Subanji. 2016. “Teori Defragmentasi Strukttur Berpikir.” (February).

Sulistyo, Lilik, Y. L. Sukestiyarno, and Zaenuri Mastur. 2021. “OVERVIEW OF GEOMETRIC REASONING ABILITY OF SIXTH-GRADE STUDENTS IN SOLVING FLAT PLANE GEOMETRIC PROBLEMS AT THE INTEGRATED ISLAMIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AL-MAWADDAH SEMARANG IN INDONESIA.” Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University 56(4). doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.4.76.

Surya, Edy, and Edi Syahputra. 2017. “Improving High-Level Thinking Skills by Development of Learning PBL Approach on the Learning Mathematics for Senior High School Students.” International Education Studies 10(8):12. doi: 10.5539/ies.v10n8p12.

Teresa, Helyana, Zubaidah Zubaidah, and Asep Nursangaji. 2020. “Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Pisa Pada Konten Change and Relationship.” Jurnal AlphaEuclidEdu 1(2):60. doi: 10.26418/ja.v1i2.42879.

Tohir, Mohammad, Maswar Maswar, Atikurrahman Moh, Saiful Saiful, and Diyah Ayu Rizki Pradita. 2020. “Prospective Teachers’ Expectations of Students’ Mathematical Thinking Processes in Solving Problems.” European Journal of Educational Research 9(4). doi: 10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1735.

Utami, Ratna Widianti, and Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa. 2017. “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Dan Self-Efficacy Siswa SMP Negeri Di Kabupaten Ciamis.” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika 4(2):166. doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.14897.

Wang, Boyan, Xuegang Hu, Peipei Li, and Philip S. Yu. 2021. “Cognitive Structure Learning Model for Hierarchical Multi-Label Text Classification.” Knowledge-Based Systems 218. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106876.

Wuryantoro, Aris. 2020. “Learning Translation and Multi-Culture to Reduce Social Conflict.” Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal) 1(1). doi: 10.25273/she.v1i1.5855.

Yang, Hao. 2017. “A Research on the Effective Questioning Strategies in Class.” Science Journal of Education 5(4). doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170504.16.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.