A Virtual Lab Activity Combined with a Prediction-Observation-Explanation Model to Improve Students Learning Outcomes in Direct Current Circuit
Abstract
Keywords crocodile physics, direct current, physics, POE learning model, virtual lab.
Abstrak Kegiatan laboratorium sangat penting dalam mendukung keberhasilan proses belajar mengajar fisika di sekolah. Namun, keterbatasan fasilitas laboratorium di sekolah cukup menganggu aktivitas-aktivitas laboratorium. Kombinasi antara pembelajaran predict-observe-explain (POE) dengan kegiatan laboratorium virtual dapat menjadi salah satu alternatif untuk mewujudkan proses pembelajaran fisika yang lebih aktif, menarik, dan bermakna serta mengatasi keterbatasan peralatan di laboratorium. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dampak kegiatan virtual lab dengan pembelajaran POE terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada topik rangkaian arus searah. Peserta merupakan peserta didik kelas XII di salah satu SMA di Kota Palangka Raya, yang terdiri dari 30 peserta didik yang belum mempelajari rangkaian arus searah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pra-eksperimen dengan desain one-group pre and post-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil belajar peserta didik meningkat dengan kategori sedang (diperoleh skor N-Gain 0,695). Secara spesifik, peningkatan tersebut ditemukan pada subtopik-subtopik arus dan tegangan listrik, rangkaian listrik sederhana, rangkaian listrik seri dan paralel, dan Hukum Ohm. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, kegiatan virtual lab dengan pembelajaran POE dapat dipertimbangkan sebagai salah satu alternatif untuk melakukan kegiatan pembelajaran yang bermakna, khususnya dalam pembelajaran fisika.
Kata kunci crocodile physics, arus searah, fisika, model pembelajaran POE, lab virtual.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alfiyanti, I. F., Jatmiko, B., & Wasis. (2020). The effectiveness of predict observe explain (POE) model with PhET to improve critical thinking skills of senior high school students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2): 76–85. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.34
Ambusaidi, A., Al-Mosawi, A., Al-Balushi, S., & Al-Balushi, K. (2018). The impact of virtual lab learning experiences on 9th grade students' achievement and their attitudes towards science and learning by virtual lab. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(2), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10227a
Antonio, R. P., & Castro, R. R. (2023). Effectiveness of virtual simulations in improving secondary students’ achievement in physics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 533-556. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16229a
Ayvaci, H. S. (2013). Investigating the effectiveness of predict-observe-explain strategy on teaching photo electricity topic. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 548.
Benckert, S. & Pettersson, S. (2008). Learning physics in small-group discussions–three examples. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(2): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75312
Budi, R. S., Edhi, S. S., & Sukisno, M. (2014). Implementasi model pembelajaran physics-edutainment dengan bantuan media Crocodile Physics pada mata pelajaran fisika. UPEJ (Unnes Physics Education Journal), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v3i1.3106
Ceberio, M., Almudí, J.M. & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and Application of Interactive Simulations in Problem-Solving in University-Level Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9615-7
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California, SAGE Publications.
Darrah, M., Humbert, R., Finstein, J. et al. (2014). Are Virtual Labs as Effective as Hands-on Labs for Undergraduate Physics? A Comparative Study at Two Major Universities. Journal of Science Education and Technology 23, 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9513-9
Dewi, K. I., Sudjito, D. N., & Pattiserlihun, A. (2022). E-module design based on Golabz for online physics learning about RLC series circuits. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 67-77. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.43458
Dorneles, P.F.T., Veit, E.A., & Moreira, M.A. (2010). A study about the learning of students who worked with computational modeling and simulation in the study of simple electric circuits. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 9(3), 569-595.
El Kharki, K., Berrada, K., & Burgos, D. (2021). Design and Implementation of a Virtual Laboratory for Physics Subjects in Moroccan Universities. Sustainability, 13(7), 3711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073711
Guido, R. M. (2013). Attitude and motivation towards learning physics. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 2(11), 2087–2094. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn1085
Gumrowi, A. (2016). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Listrik Dinamik menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization melalui Simulasi Crocodile Physics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v5i1.110
Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M. Y., Nisrina, N., Herayanti, L., & Rahmatiah, R. (2018). The effect of virtual lab and gender toward students’ creativity of physics in senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 012043. 10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012043
Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores, AREA-D American Education Research Association’s Devision, Measurement and Reasearch Methodology, Washington DC.
Hamamous, A., & Benjelloun, N. (2022). The Added Value of Integrating the Electronics Workbench Simulator in the Teaching of Electrical Concepts to Moroccan High School Students. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 18(12), pp. 54–69. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v18i12.30743
Hartanto, T.J., Dinata, P.A.C., Azizah, N., Qadariah, A., & Pratama, A. (2023). Students' science process skills and understanding on Ohm's law and direct current circuit through virtual laboratory based predict-observe-explain model. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 11(1):113-128. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i1.27477
Hartanto, T.J. (2017). Pembelajaran IPA pada konsep kalor yang berorientasi doing science. Jurnal Fisika Indonesia, 21(2): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.22146/jfi.42201
Hilario, J. S. (2015). The use of Predict-Observe-Explain-Explore (POEE) as a new teaching strategy in general chemistry laboratory. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(2),37-48.
Ismail, A., Festiana, I., Hartini, T.I., Yusal, Y., & Malik, A. (2019). Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding of electricity using learning media-based augmented reality, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1157 032049. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032049
Karamustafaoğlu, S., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2015). Understanding Electrochemistry Concepts Using the Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5): 923-936. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1364a
Kereh, C. T., Asryanty, W. O., & Sapulette, H. (2020). Penggunaan software Crocodile Physics 6.0.5 dalam pembelajaran fisika materi gerak lurus berubah beraturan (GLBB). Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v7i1.11055
Kibirige, I., Osodo, J., & Tlala, K. (2014). The Effect of Predict-Observe-Explain Strategy on Learners’ Misconceptions about Dissolved Salts. Mediterranean Journal Of Social Sciences, 5(4), 300. Retrieved from https://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/2217/2203
Kocijancic, S., & O’Sullivan, C. (2004). Real or Virtual laboratories in science teaching. Is this actually a dilemma? Informatics in Education, 3(2), 239–249.
Lara Kathleen Smetana & Randy L. Bell (2012) Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature, International Journal of Science Education, 34:9, 1337-1370, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
Majdi, M.K., Subali, B., Sugianto, S. (2018). Peningkatan komunikasi ilmiah siswa sma melalui model quantum learning one day one question berbasis daily life science question. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 7(1): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v7i1.22479
Marcelina, S., Miranda, Y., Sinaga, S., & Hartanto, T.J. (2022). Implementasi model pembelajaran predict-observe-explain berbasis masalah terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan pemahaman konsep pada topik pencemaran lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 10(4):705-716. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i4.25846
Marcelina, S., & Hartanto, T. J. (2021). Correcting Students’ Understanding about Simple Direct Current (DC) Circuits through Scientific Approach. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2): 153-160. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07207
Osman, K. (2017). Addressing Secondary School Students’ Misconceptions About Simple Current Circuits Using the Learning Cycle Approach. In: Karpudewan, M., Md Zain, A., Chandrasegaran, A. (eds) Overcoming Students' Misconceptions in Science. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4_12
Qurniawan, S., Sutarto, S., & Supriadi, B. (2019). Efektifitas media elektronik crocodile physics dalam pembelajaran optik di SMA. FKIP E-PROCEEDING, 3(2), 107-113. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/fkip-epro/article/view/9403
Rodríguez, Y., Obaya, E. & Vargas, Y. (2021). ICT: Didactic Strategy using Online Simulators for the Teaching Learning of the Law of Conservation of Matter and its Relationship to Chemical Reactions in Higher Middle Education. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 10(2), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.20448/2003.102.56.67
Sahin, M. (2009). Exploring university students' expectations and beliefs about physics and physics learning in problem based learning context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, Technology Education, 5(4): 321-333. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75283
Sari, U., Duygu, E., Sen, Ö. F., & Kirindi, T. (2020). The Effect of STEM Education on Scientific Process Skills and STEM Awareness in Simulation Based Inquiry Learning Environment. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(3), 387-405.
Sari, P. I., Gunawan, G., & Harjono, A. (2017). Penggunaan Discovery Learning Berbantuan Laboratorium Virtual pada Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(4), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i4.310
Suparno, P. (2007). Metodologi pembelajaran fisika: konstruktivistik dan menyenangkan, Universitas Sanata Dharma Press, Yogyakarta.
Suryaningsih, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran berbasis praktikum sebagai sarana siswa untuk berlatih menerapkan keterampilan proses sains dalam materi biologi. Bio Educatio (The Journal of Science and Biology Education), 2(2), 49-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/be.v2i2.759
Suryanti, E., Fitriani, A., Redjeki, S., & Riandi, R. (2019). Virtual laboratory as a media to improve the conceptual mastery of molecular biology, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317 012202. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012202
Taqwa, M. R., & Putra, G. S. (2017). Kajian Efektifitas Penggunaan Model POE berintegrasi PhET pada Topik Kelistrikan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan “Nanodik”. Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik: 42-52
Urbančič, M., & Glažar, S. A. (2012). Impact of Experiments on 13-year-old Pupils’ Understanding of Selected Science Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(3): 207-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.836a
Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2023). Why aren't secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38(4), 324-329. DOI 10.1088/0031-9120/38/4/306
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.