MoIP-ST An Instrument to Measure Students Problem Solving Skills on Momentum and Impulse

Itsna Rona Wahyu Astuti, Ida Kaniawati, Achmad Samsudin, Endi Suhendi, Supardiyono Supardiyono, Andreas Suparman, Rona Hegarna, Rosi Vera

Abstract


Abstract This research aims to develop the MoIP-ST (Momentum and Impulse Problem-Solving Test) instrument to measure students' problem-solving abilities according to the stages of problem-solving skills. The research method used is 4). The research participants were 64 students, consisting of 32 rural and 32 urban 10th-grade students in East Java, who were randomly selected. The first analysis is a multi-rater Rasch measurement based on the results of expert validation, which indicates that item I1 needs improvement. The second analysis is the analysis of the MoIP-ST instrument using the Rasch model, which shows that overall the items on the MoIP-ST are valid and reliable with a Cronbach Alpha of 0.87. The third analysis is the use of the MoIP-ST, which shows that the problem-solving ability of rural students is lower than that of urban students. Student problem-solving needs to be improved through models, methods, learning models, and teaching materials that support problem-solving.   

 

Keywords test instrument, problem solving skills, physics learning.  

 

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen MoIP-ST  (Momentum and Impulse Problem-Solving Test) untuk mengukur kemampuan memecahkan masalah siswa sesuai dengan tahapan kemampuan memecahkan masalah. Metode yang digunakan penelitian adalah 4). Partisipan penelitian adalah 64 siswa yang terdiri dari 32 siswa pedesaan dan 32 siswa perkotaan kelas 10 di Jawa Timur yang dipilih secara acak. Analisis pertama adalah pengukuran Rasch multi-rater dari hasil validasi ahli menunjukkan bahwa item I1 perlu perbaikan. Analisis kedua adalah analisis instrumen MoIP-ST  menggunakan Rasch Model menunjukkan secara keseluruhan item pada MoIP-ST  valid dan reliabel dengan Cronbach Alpha sebesar 0,87. Analisis ketiga adalah penggunaan MoIP-ST  menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pedesaan lebih rendah dibandingkan siswa perkotaan. Pemecahan masalah siswa perlu ditingkatkan melalui model, metode, model pembelajaran, dan bahan ajar yang mendukung pemecahan masalah.  

 

Kata kunci instrumen tes, keterampilan pemecahan masalah, pembelajaran fisika.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1701-1716


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Third Edition 3rd Edition. In Maternal & Child Nutrition (Vol. 11, Issue supplement S2).

Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. In Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences.

Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.

Dewi, G. A. C., Sunarno, W., & Supriyanto, A. (2019). The needs analysis on module development based on creative problem solving method to improve students’ problem solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153(1).

Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–13.

Fadilah, R., & Yohandri. (2019). Need analysis of student worksheet based on tracker on static fluid learning material in high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1).

Gok, T. (2010). The General Assessment of Problem Solving Processes and Metacognition in Physics Education. International Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 2(2), 110–122.

Hegde, B., & Meera, B. N. (2012). How do they solve it? An insight into the learner’s approach to the mechanism of physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1), 1–9.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to Solve Problems.

Koçak, D. (2020). Investigation of rater tendencies and reliability in different assessment methods with many facet rasch model. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(4), 349–358.

Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multipe representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.

Masitoh, P. N. A., Latifah, S., Saregar, A., Aziz, A., Suharto, & Jamaluddin, W. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of physics problem solving. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1).

Mofreh, S. A. M., Ghafar, M. N. A., Hj Omar, A. H., Mosaku, M., & Ma’ruf, A. (2014). Psychometric properties on lecturers’ beliefs on teaching function: Rasch model analysis. International Education Studies, 7(11), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n11p47

Ng, S. E., Yeo, K. J., & Mohd Kosnin, A. B. (2018). Item Analysis for the Adapted Motivation Scale Using Rasch Model. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(4), 264. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i4.15376

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving: Students’ Skills in Tackling Real-Life Problems (Volume V): Vol. V. OECD Publishing.

Polya, G. (1957). “How to Solve It.” In How to Solve It.

Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 30, Issue 04).

Sujarwanto, E., Hidayat, A., & Wartono. (2014). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(2), 146–153.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarsho, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assesment Pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.

Sutarno, S., Setiawan, A., Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2017). Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Problem-solving Skills in Projectile Motion Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1).

Talib, R., Iahad, N. A., Ashari, Z. M., Rameli, M. R. M., Bakar, Z. A., & Dollah, R. (2019). Rasch strategies for evaluating quality of the Conceptions and Alternative assessment Survey (CETAS). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12 A), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071902

Wulantri, Distrik, I. W., Suyatna, A., & Rosidin, U. (2020). The Effectiveness of Creative-Inquiry-Based Student Worksheet in Improving Physics Self-Efficacy and Problem Solving of Senior High School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.