Ethnomatematics-Based Mobile Learning Design to Improve Self-Regulated Learning
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to produce ethnomatematic-based mobile learning that can be implemented so that it can improve student self-regulated learning. The research design used was the pre and posttest group design. The experimental and control groups will be given a pretest before treatment and a posttest after treatment. The population used was elementary school students and the sample used was 439 consisting of 215 students from the experimental class and 224 students from the control class. Data analysis in this study used statistical data processing software IBM SPSS version 27. Based on the summary of the results of the independent t test, the value of Sig. (2-tailed) on the posttest data of less than 0.001. This value is smaller than the specified significance level of 0.05. This means that the averages of the experimental and control groups at the time of the posttest were significantly different. The results of the analysis of self-regulated learning show that the analysis carried out on self-regulated learning only obtained complete data on 134 students from the experimental class and 134 from the control class. The research results in the experimental class show that the learning planning variable is in the high category. The conclusion from this research is that the results of learning with mobile learning with ethnomathematics content on self-regulated learning can improve student learning outcomes so that they can be implemented in schools.
Keywords mobile learning, ethnomathematics, self-regulated learning, learning outcomes.
Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan mobile learning berbasis ethnomatematic yang dapat diimplementasikan sehingga dapat meningkatkan self-regulated learning siswa. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah pre and posttest group design. Kelompok eksperimen dan kontrol akan diberikan pretest sebelum dilakukan treatment dan diberikan posttest setelah dilakukan treatment. Populasi yang digunakan adalah siswa sekolah dasar dan sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 439 yang terdiri dari 215 siswa kelas eksperimen dan 224 siswa kelas kontrol. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan software pengolah data statistik IBM SPSS versi 27. Berdasarkan ringkasan hasil independent t test, nilai Sig. (2-tailed) pada data posttest sebesar kurang dari 0.001. Nilai tersebut lebih kecil dari taraf signifikansi yang ditetapkan yaitu 0.05. Artinya rata-rata kelompok eksperimen dan kontrol pada saat posttest berbeda secara signifikan. Hasil analisis self-regulated learning diperoleh bahwa Analisis yang dilakukan pada self-regulated learning hanya memperoleh data lengkap siswa yang mengerjakan sebanyak 134 dari kelas eksperimen dan 134 dari kelas kontrol. Hasil penelitian pada kelas eksperimen menunjukkan bahwa pada variable perencanaan pembelajaran berada pada kategori tinggi. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah hasil belajar dengan mobile learning bermuatan etnomatematika terhadap self-regulated learning dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa sehingga dapat diimplementasikan di sekolah.
Kata kunci: pembelajaran mobile, ethnomatematika, self-regulated learning, hasil belajar.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Book:
Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review
Udell, Chad., Gary Woodill. (2014). Mastering Mobile Learning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Richey, Rita C., James D. Klein. (2007). Design and Development Research Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
Article in a Journal:
Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2018). Ethnomathematics and Numerical Cognition. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1675
Brenner, W., & Uebernickel, F. (2016). Design thinking for innovation: Research and practice. Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice, 1–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3
Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Lin, Y. C. (2019). Mobile learning and student cognition: A systematic review of PK-12 research using Bloom’s Taxonomy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 684–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12674
Fu, L., Yang, M., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2021). Mobile learning on students’ learning interest and achievement based on apt teaching model. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207209211004200
Gabriel, F., Buckley, S., & Barthakur, A. (2020). The impact of mathematics anxiety on self-regulated learning and mathematical literacy. Australian Journal of Education, 64(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120947881
Jones, J. A. (2019). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through student-generated quizzes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735610
Khachan, A. M., & Özmen, A. (2019). IMSSAP: After-school interactive mobile learning student support application. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22096
Khiat, H. (2022). Using automated time management enablers to improve self-regulated learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787419866304
Lai, C. L. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884
Liedtka, J. (2020). Putting Technology in Its Place: Design Thinking’s Social Technology at Work. In California Management Review (Vol. 62, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619897391
Merayo, N., Ruíz, I., Debrán, J., Aguado, J. C., de Miguel, I., Durán, R. J., Fernández, P., Lorenzo, R. M., & Abril, E. J. (2018). AIM-Mobile Learning Platform to enhance the teaching-learning process using smartphones. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1753–1768. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21979
Overmyer, T., & Carlson, E. B. (2019). Literature Review: Design Thinking and Place. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919854079
Pope-Ruark, R. (2019). Design Thinking in Technical and Professional Communication: Four Perspectives. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919854094
Rivers, D. J., Nakamura, M., & Vallance, M. (2022). Online Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement in the Era of Change. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 104–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211025108
Russell, J. M., Baik, C., Ryan, A. T., & Molloy, E. (2022). Fostering self-regulated learning in higher education: Making self-regulation visible. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420982378
Schumacher, T., & Mayer, S. (2018). Preparing Managers for Turbulent Contexts: Teaching the Principles of Design Thinking. Journal of Management Education, 42(4), 496–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917754235
Sha, L., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., & Zhang, B. H. (2012). Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00461.x
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.