Effectiveness of the Think Talk Write Learning Strategy toward Concept Mastery of Cell for High School Biology Students
Abstract
Abstract In cells, many phenomena occur such as metabolism to protein synthesis, these become abstract and cause students to have difficulty understanding them. A good learning experience is needed so that students can understand the concept correctly. One learning strategy that provides a learning experience to discover and understand concepts is the Think Talk Write learning strategy. This study uses a pre-experimental design method. The subjects in this study were students of class XI science at Muhammadiyah 5 Rancaekek high school. Mastery of concepts measured in this study were C1 (memorization), C2 (understanding), C3 (application), and C4 (Analysis). Based on the results of data processing, the pretest value was 47.22 while the posttest value was 65.28. The results of the analysis using the paired sample T-Test obtained from the pretest and posttest values of 0.00, this value indicates that sign less than α is equal to 0.00 less than 0.05. Based on the results of the data analysis, it can be concluded that there is an effectiveness of using the Think Talk Write learning strategy on mastery of concepts in cell material.
Keywords think talk write, concept mastery, cell
Abstrak Di dalam sel banyak fenomena yang terjadi seperti metabolisme hingga sintesis protein, hal ini menjadi abstrak dan menyebabkan siswa mengalami kesulitan dalam memahaminya. Diperlukan sebuah pengalaman belajar yang baik sehingga siswa dapat memahami konsep secara benar. Salah satu strategy pembelajaran yang memberikan sebuah pengalaman belajar untuk menemukan dan memahami konsep adalah strategy pembelajaran Think Talk Write. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pre-experimental design. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI IPA di SMA Muhammadiyah 5 Rancaekek. Penguasaan konsep yang diukur dalam penelitian ini adalah C1 (hafalan), C2 (pemahaman), C3 (penerapan), dan C4 (Analisis). Berdasarkan hasil pengolahan data diperoleh nilai pretest sebesar 47,22 sedangkan nilai posttest sebesar 65,28. Hasil analisis dengan menggunakan uji paired sample T-Test diperoleh dari nilai pretest dan posttest sebesar 0,00, nilai ini menunjukkan bahwa sign kurang dari α sama dengan 0,00 kurang dari 0,05. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data tersebut dapat disimpulkan terdapat efektivitas dari penggunaan strategy pembelajaran Think Talk Write terhadap penguasaan kondep pada materi sel.
Kata kunci think talk write, penguasaan konsep, sel.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, W. L., & Krathwohl, R. D. (2014). Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yoyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Angreani, A., Supriatno, B., & Anggraeni, S. (2020). Analisis, Uji Coba dan Rekontruksi Kegiatan Praktikum Melalui Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Struktur dan Fungsi Sel:(Analysis, Testing, Recontruction Of Practical Work Through Student Worksheet Structure And Cell Function). BIODIK, 6(3), 242-255. doi:10.22437/bio.v6i3.9467
Astuti, L. S. (2017). Penguasaan Konsep IPA Ditinjau dari Konsep Diri dan Minat Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Formatif, 7(1), 40-48. doi:10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
Bustami, Y., Riyati, Y., & Julung, H. (2019). Think Talk Write With Pictured Card Son Human Digestive System: Impact of Critical Thinking Skills. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(1), 13-23. doi:10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n1.13-23
Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2013). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hajiriah, T., Mursali, S., & Dharmawibawa, I. D. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Miskonsepsi Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 7(2), 97-104. doi:10.33394/bjib.v7i2.2356
Hamdayana, J. (2014). Model dan Metode Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Berkarakter. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hidayati, N. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Talk Write Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa Pada Matakuliah Biologi Sel. Bioilmi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(2), 94-99. doi:10.19109/bioilmi.v3i2.1400
Huinker, D. A., & Laughlin, C. (1996). Talk Your Way Into Writing. Dalam P.C Elliot dan M.J Kenney (Eds.). USA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Juanengsih, N., Rahmat, A., Wulan, R. A., & Rahman, T. (2021). Representasi Mental Mahasiswa dalam Membaca Gambar Struktur Membran Sel Setelah Perkuliahan Biologi Sel dengan Pendekatan VARK. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Biologi, 2(1), 9-18. doi:10.26740/jipb.v2n1.p9-18
Kılıç, D., Taber, K. S., & Winterbottom, M. (2016). A Cross-national Study of Students’ Understanding of Genetics Concepts: Implications from Similarities and Differences in England and Turkey. Education Research International. doi:10.1155/2016/6539626.
Listiana, L. (2013). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Berpikir Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe GI (Group Investigation) dan TTW (Think, Talk, Write). Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning, 10(1).
Lukman, A. A. (2017). The Difference of Learning Model Think-Talk -Write (TTW) and Conventional Learning Model in Improving Students Critical Thinking Skills in Sociology Subject. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences (IRJES), 1(2), 21-24.
Rahmawati, Y., Praytino, B. A., & Indrowati, M. (2013). Studi Komparasi Tingkat Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kontruktivis-Kolaboratif. Semaranag: Seminar X Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS.
Sesli, E., & Kara, Y. (2012). Development and application of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of cell division and reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 214-225. doi:10.1080/00219266.2012.688849
Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Topçiu, M., & Myftiu, J. (2015). Vygotsky Theory on Social Interaction and its Influence on the Development of Pre-School Children. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 4(1), 2411–9563. doi:10.1300/J110v11n01_11
Refbacks
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.