Using Newman Error Analysis to Detect Students Error in Solving Junior High School Mathematics Problem

Zulkaidah Nur Ahzan, Justin Eduardo Simarmata, Ferdinandus Mone

Abstract


Abstract The existence of student errors is due to the inability of the students to receive and process the information contained in the given questions. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct an analysis to find out student errors so that the results obtained in the analysis can be used by teachers to provide appropriate assistance to students, either through methods or media in learning mathematics. This study is a qualitative descriptive study. The purpose of this study was to find out how many errors were made by the eighth-grade class of Nurul Falah MTs in solving math problems according to Newman’s theory in school year 2021/2022. So that solutions to reduce errors can be found and also to emphasize which parts require a deeper understanding in solving math problems. The results of the analysis showed that the percentage of student errors in the Reading Error (RE) phase was 13.33 percent, Reading Comprehension (RC) phase was 42.22 percent, Transformation Error (TE) phase was 28.89 percent, Process Skill (PS) phase was 71.11 percent, and the Encoding Error (EE) phase was 86.67 percent. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the most errors made by students are Encoding Error, which are 86.67 percent.

Keywords student error analysis, Islamic junior high school, Newman’s Theory.

Abstrak Adanya kesalahan para siswa dikarenakan belum mampunya menerima dan mengolah informasi yang ada pada soal yang diberikan. Oleh karena itu perlu dilakukan analisis dalam mengetahui kesalahan-kesalahan siswa sehingga dengan hasil yang diperoleh dalam analisis dapat digunakan oleh guru untuk memberikan bantuan yang tepat, baik melalui metode ataupun media dalam pembelajaran, kepada para siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui seberapa besar tingkat kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh para siswa kelas VIII MTs Nurul Falah Kefamenanu dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika menurut teori Newman pada tahun ajaran 2021/2022. Sehingga solusi untuk mengurangi kesalahan dapat ditemukan dan juga untuk menekankan dibagian mana saja yang membutuhkan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika. Hasil analisis yang dilakukan menunjukkan bahwa ) persentase kesalahan siswa pada tahapan Reading Error (RE) sebesar 13.33 persen, tahapan Reading Comprehension (RC) sebesar 42.22 persen, tahapan Transform Error (TE) sebesar 28.89 persen, tahapan Process Skill (PS) sebesar 71.11 persen, dan tahapan Encoding Error (EE) sebesar 86.67 persen. Dari hasil analisis tersebut terlihat bahwa kesalahan yang paling banyak dilakukan oleh para siswa adalah kesalahan Encoding Error atau kesalahan dalam pengkodean, yaitu sebesar 86.67 persen.

Kata kunci analisis kesalahan siswa, MTs, Teori Newman.

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i2.pp459-473


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A. H., Zainal Abidin, N. L., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of Students ’ Errors in Solving Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) Problems for the Topic of Fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133

Abu Mansor, S. N., Samsudin, N., & Ahmad Shukri, F. N. (2021). Newman’s Error Analysis of Common Errors in Solving Convergence of Power Series Using Ratio Test. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(9), 888–898. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i9/11077

Angco, R. J. N. (2021). Error Analysis in Integral Calculus: A Modified Newman’s Approach. American Research Journal of Humanities Social Science (ARJHSS), 04(09), 38–52.

Aulia, J., & Kartini. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Pada Materi Himpunan Kelas VII SMP / MTs. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 05(01), 484–500.

Beji, A. B., Zakariyya, A. A., & Itodo, U. (2018). ERROR ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY SIX PUPILS IN WORD PROBLEMS. SER, 18(December), 54–62.

Fitriani, H.N.; Turmudi, T.; Prabawanto, S. (2018). Analysis of students error in mathematical problem solving based on Newman ’ s error analysis. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education, 3, 791–796.

Khalo, X., Bayaga, A., & Wadesango, N. (2015). Error Analysis : Case of Pre-service Teachers. Int J Edu Sci, 9(2), 173–179.

Lubis, R. S., Pramudya, I., & Subanti, S. (2021). Mathematics Literacy: Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA) Review from Habits of Mind. International Conference of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (I-CMME 2021) Mathematics, 597, 237–245.

Mafruhah, L., & Muchyidin, A. (2020). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika berdasarkan kriteria Watson. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 24–35.

Makamure, C., & Jojo, Z. M. (2022). An analysis of errors for pre-service teachers in first order ordinary differential equations. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), 1–11.

Nurianti, E., Halini, & Romal. (2015). ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATEMATIKA MATERI PECAHAN BENTUK ALJABAR DIKELAS VIII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 4(9).

Oktaviana, D. (2017). Analisis tipe kesalahan berdasarkan teori newman dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada mata kuliah matematika diskrit. EduSains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 5(2), 22–32.

Santoso, T. (2019). Analyzing Students ’ Error in Problem Solving of Two-Variable Linear Equation System : A Case Study of Grade Eight Students of Indonesian Junior High School. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 283–296.

Seng, N. B. (2020). Newman Error Analysis For Errors In Mathematical Word Questions Among Year Three Students In Sekolah Kebangsaan Taman Kluang Barat. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 7(2), 58–63.

Shida, N., Norulhuda, Aini, N., Sharifah, & Halim, A. (2019). Investigating Newman ’ s Error In Integral Calculus. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(6), 1114–1117.

Sovia, A., & Herman, T. (2019). Slow learner errors analysis in solving integer problems in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(3), 1281–1288.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan (pendekatan kuantitatif , kualitatif dan r & d.

Susanti, R. D., & Taufik, M. (2019). Analysis Students’ Mistakes of Teacher Professional Education In Completing Story Problems Based on Newman Procedures. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(2), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i2.59

Syuhada, N., Alhassora, A., Abu, M. S., & Abdullah, A. H. (2017). NEWMAN ERROR ANALYSIS ON EVALUATING AND CREATING THINKING SKILLS. Man In India, 97(19), 413–427.

Thomas, D. S., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Error in Solving Quadratic Equations Using Newman’s Procedure. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i12/11760

Tiflis, O., Ineson, G., & Watts, M. (2019). Ratio and Proportion: An Analysis of GCSE Resit Students’ Errors. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 39(March), 1–6.

Wardhani, T. A. W. W., & Argaswari, D. P. A. D. (2022). HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ERROR IN SOLVING WORD PROBLEM OF TRIGONOMETRY BASED ON NEWMAN ERROR HIERARCHICAL MODEL. Infinity : Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 87–102.

Zamzam, K. F., & Patricia, F. A. (2018). Error Analysis of Newman to Solve the Geometry Problem in Terms of Cognitive Style. University of Muhammadiyah Malang’s 1st International Conference of Mathematics Education (INCOMED 2017), 160, 24–27.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
The copyright is reserved to The Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.