EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MODEL BLENDED LEARNING

Widodo Tri Hardjanto, Budi Koestoro, Riswandi Riswandi

Abstract


This study measures; (1) the strength of base reason of applied program, (2) availability level input, (3) level of process in applying program. This study uses CIPP evaluation model, applied in 7th Grade of Ar Raihan Islamic High School Bandarlampung.The result of evaluation showed that support on blended learning is high from schools society as excistence of positive need by students, teachers and parents toward program. The teachers qualification fit to Permendiknas No.16 2007, and qualification of IT staff fit to Permen No.45 2009. Internet installation sliced below the standard on OS. Lesson Plan assessed as Very Good and Lack. Learning process assessed as Good and Lack. The pressence of teachers and students were Very Good. Students participation on class was Very Good. The score of first and second midtest were 47.56 and 53.54.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur (1) kekuatan pijakan pemberlakuan program, (2) kekuatan dukungan input terhadap program, (3) keberlangsungan proses persiapan dan pelaksanaan pembelajaran. Penelitian dilakukan di kelas VII SMP IT Ar Raihan Bandarlampung. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa dukungan terhadap pembelajaran blended learning sangat besar dari kepala sekolah, orangtua, guru dan siswa. Dukungan terhadap pembelajaran blended learning dari siswa (85%), guru matematika (75%), dan orangtua (84%). Kualifikasi guru telah sesuai dengan Permendiknas No 16 tahun 2007, dan kualifikasi tenaga TI telah sesuai dengan Permen No 45 tahun 2009. Peralatan komputer untuk sistem operasi (OS) masih di bawah standar. RPP dua guru matematika bernilai Sangat Baik dan Kurang. Pelaksanaan pembelajaran dua guru matematika Baik danKurang. Kehadiran guru dan siswa sangat baik. Keterlibatan siswa dalam pembelajaran Sangat Baik. Rerata skor Mid pertama 47,56 dan Mid kedua 53,54.

Kata kunci: blended learning, CIPP, evaluasi pembelajaran.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, I Elaine, et.al. 2007. Blending In; The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in United States.Amerika : Sloan CTM

Dabbagh, Nada dan Bannan-Ritland, Brenda. 2005. Online Learning; Concepts, Strategies, and Aplications. New Jersey : Pearson Merrill Prentice-Hall.

DelVecchio, Kristy dan Loughney, Megan. 2006. Advantages and Disadvantages of E-Learning. E-Learning Concepts and Techniques. Pennsylvania : Bloomsburg University

EduviewsTM. 2009. Blended Learning: Where Online and Face-to-Face Instruction Intersect for 21st Century Teaching and Learning Process. Washington : Blackboard Inc

Gecer, Aynur dan Dag, Funda. 2012. Blended Learning Experience. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practices. pp. 438-442.

Napier, Nannette P, et al. 2011. Transition to Blended Learning: Understanding Students and Facultu Perceptions. Journal of Asynchronous Networks, Vol 15: Issue 1. Pp 20-32.

Pregot, Michael V. 2013. The Case for Blended Instruction: Is It Proven Better Way to Teach?. US-China Education Review Vol. 3 No. 5. pp 320-324.

US Dept of Education. 2014. The Effect of Cognitive Strategy Instruction on Math Problem Solving of Middle School Students of Varying Ability. WWC SingkeStudy Review. pp 1-7.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.