Google Classroom as a Collaboration Tool For Blended Learning in Vocational Education

Nia Lestari, Agus Haris Abadi

Abstract


The vocational learning paradigm is changing in the demands of the current era, it is necessary to change teaching methods that follow changes in industry trends, information systems, education quality and students who have a significant relationship with pedagogical methods and the needs of the world of work. Blended learning is balanced learning. This balance is achieved by combining the advantages of the two learning modalities. It is also clear that the generally accepted concept of blended learning is to combine some aspects of technology with face-to-face learning. Google Classroom offers a core suite of tools that includes the basics of the classroom. This paper focuses on Google Classroom as a collaborative tool in blended learning, combining technology and face-to-face interaction to increase student engagement, streamline assessment and open lines of communication between teachers and students. From several studies that have been carried out through the literature review method. Google Classroom provides similar applications through Google Docs, Sheets and Slides to facilitate e-learning.

Keywords: google classroom, collaboration, blended learning, vocation education


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpvti.v3.i1.202105


Full Text:

PDF

References


Astuti, C. C., Sari, H. M. K., & Azizah, N. L. (2019). Perbandingan Efektifitas Proses Pembelajaran Menggunakan Metode E-Learning dan Konvensional. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 2(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v2i1.2395

Bloemer, W., & Swan, K. (2013). Investigating informal blending at the University of Illinois Springfield. In Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880310

Churiyah, M., Sholikhan, S., Filianti, F., & Sakdiyyah, D. A. (2020). Indonesia education readiness conducting distance learning in Covid-19 pandemic situation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(6), 491–507.

Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J. L., Cavanagh, T. B., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). Blended courses as drivers of institutional transformation. In Blended Learning across Disciplines: Models for Implementation (pp. 17–37). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-479-0.ch002

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802154970

Lutfi, M., Buntuang, P. C. D., Kornelius, Y., & Hasanuddin, B. (2020). The impact of social distancing policy on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 492.

Mansor, A. Z. (2012). Google Docs as a Collaborating Tool for Academicians. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.295

McGrath, V. (2013). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs Memorial. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.21225/d51g6h

Michie, S., West, R., Rogers, M. B., Bonell, C., Rubin, G. J., & Amlôt, R. (2020). Reducing SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission in the UK: A behavioural science approach to identifying options for increasing adherence to social distancing and shielding vulnerable people. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(4), 945–956.

Norberg, A. (2017). From blended learning to learning onlife - ICTs, time and access in higher educaiton. In Umeå University.

Ramadiani, Azainil, Haryaka, U., Agus, F., & Kridalaksana, A. H. (2017). User Satisfaction Model for e-Learning Using Smartphone. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.070

Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). Google classroom as a tool for active learning. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960909

Sibuea, T. F. B., & LIA, S. T. B. A. (2018). Students’ Perceptions on The Use of Google Classroom to support Blended Learning for the Pengantar Linguistik Umum Course. Lingua.

Suzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.x

Thunström, L., Newbold, S. C., Finnoff, D., Ashworth, M., & Shogren, J. F. (2020). The benefits and costs of using social distancing to flatten the curve for COVID-19. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 11(2), 179–195.

Using Google Docs to Support Project-based Learning. (2011). AISHE-J - The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.

Violante, M. G., & Vezzetti, E. (2014). Implementing a new approach for the design of an e‐learning platform in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 22(4), 708–727.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960%2F22392

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Vokasional

Diterbitkan oleh:

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI
FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG

 

Jl. Prof. Dr. Sumantri Brojonegoro No.1Kota Bandar Lampung
Homepage: http://pti.fkip.unila.ac.id
email: pti@fkip.unila.ac.id