Comparative Study Between Make a Match and Two Stay Two Stray of Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Learning Outcomes of Hydrocarbon Materials

Weni Tri Sasmi

Abstract


Abstract: Comparative Study Between Make a Match and Two Stay Two Stray of Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Learning Outcomes of Hydrocarbon Materials. This study aims to compare the learning outcomes between the Make a Match type and the Two Stay Two Stray type cooperative learning model on hydrocarbon materials. This study carried out at SMK Tamansiswa Kisaran, North Sumatera. The sampling technique used saturated sampling (census), where the samples in consist of 2 class, that is class XII-1 applied the Make a Match and class XII-2 applied the Two Stay Two Stray, with 20 students in each class. Data were collected from pre-test and post-test, then analyzed statistically using t test. Based on the results of data analysis, the average value of learning outcomes in the pretest-posttest in experimental class 1 is 27.5 and 77.0 while the average value of learning outcomes in the pre-post-test in experimental class 2 is 25.3 and 77.8. The t-test was carried out using the independent sample test technique. The significant value (2-tailed) was 0.406˂2.026, meaning that H0 was accepted and Ha was rejected. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference in student learning outcomes who use the Make a Match type with the Two Stay Two Stray type cooperative learning model on hydrocarbon materials.

Keywords: Learning model, learning outcomes, make a match, two stay two stray.

 

Abstrak: Studi Perbandingan antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe make a match dan tipe two stay two stray terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada materi hidrokarbon. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat perbandingan hasil belajar antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dengan tipe Two Stay Two Stray pada pokok bahasan hidrokarbon. Penelitin ini dilakukan di SMK Tamansiswa Kisaran, Sumatera Utara. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan sampling jenuh (sensus), dimana sampel terdiri dari 2 kelas, yaitu kelas XII-1 menerapkan Make a Match dan kelas XII-2 menerapkan Two Stay Two Stray dengan masing-masing kelas berjumlah 20 siswa. Data dikumpulkan dari pre-tes dan post tes, kemudian di analisis secara statistik menggunakan uji t. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data diperoleh nilai rata-rata hasil belajar kognitif pada pretest-posttest di kelas eksperimen 1 sebesar 27,5 dan 77,0 sedangkan nilai rata-rata hasil belajar kognitif pada pre test-post test di kelas eskperimen 2 sebesar 25,3 dan 77,8. Uji t dilakukan dengan teknik independent sampel test diperoleh nilai signifikan (2-tailed) adalah sebesar 0,406˂2,026, artinya H0 diterima dan Ha ditolak. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar siswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dengan tipe Two Stay Two Stray pada pokok bahasan hidrokarbon.

Kata kunci: hasil belajar, make a match, model pembelajaran, two stay two stray.

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jppk.v11.i1.2022.08


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahriani, F. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaan kooperatif dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar kimia peserta didik kelas X SMK Negeri 2 Bantaeng. Chemica, 14(1), 1-9.

Apriakanti, D., Kusuma, M., & Nurhayati, M. (2020). The effectiveness of two stay two stray (TSTS) cooperative learning model in improving students 'critical thinking skills. Journal of Science Education Research, 4(1), 40-43.

Azizah, A.N., & Budiyanto, M. (2019). Improvement of student learning outcomes through reciprocal teaching approach assisted by mind map at science learning in junior high school. E-Jurnal Pensa, 7(2), 57-61.

Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori belajar & pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Elham, H., Dilmaghani, K.A., & Hesar, A.P. (2019). Students’ misconceptions on acid-base chemistry. Journal of Basic Education and Human Sciences, 43, 743-753.

Hake, R. R. (1998). “Interactive engagement v. s traditional methods: six- thousand student survey of mechanics achievement in Kenya’s Nakuru district”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3).

Ilmawati, H., & Suherman, A. (2016). The effect of physical education teaching materials towards situational interest. International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education, p.41-46. DOI:10.2991/icieve-15.2016.10.

Kamamia, L.N., Ngugi, N.T., & Thinguri, R.W. (2014). To establish the extent to which the subject mastery enhances quality teaching to student-teachers during teaching practice. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7), 641-648. ISSN: 2201-6740.

Lazim, N., Aldriyanti, N., Alpusari, M., Hermita, N., & Mahbubah, K. (2018). Utilizing cooperative learning model types make a match to promote primary students’ achivement in science. Journal of Teaching and Learning in elementary Education, 1(1), 11-21. ISSN: 2615-4528.

Lin, J.W., Yen, M.H., Liang, J.C., Chiu, M.H., & Guo, C.J. (2016). Examining the factors that influence students’ science learning processes and their learning outcomes: 30 years of conceptual change research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2617-2646. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a.

Manik, A. (2012). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Make A Match Menggunakan Media Handout Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Hidrokarbon di SMA. (Thesis). Univesitas Negeri Medan, Medan.

Maulana, M. & Hidayati, N.A. (2017). Two stay two stray cooperative learning model in mathematics learning outcomes. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 5(3), 354-358. DOI:10.26858/jds.v5i3.4842.

Muchtar, Z. & Harizal. (2012), Analyzing of students’ misconceptions on acid-base chemistry at senior high schools in Medan. Journal of Education and Practice, 3,(15).

Muttaqiin, A., Lufri., Yogica, R., & Fitri, R. (2020). Achievement of students’ concept mastery through concept based learning and drill methods in biology instructional methodology course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1940 (2021) 012118. IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1940/1/012118.

Nola, G.D. (2012). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Teknik Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Untuk Mencapai Ketuntasan Belajar Siswa Pada Pelajaran Kimia di Kelas X-6 SMA N 12 Pekanbaru (Thesis). Universitas Riau, Riau.

Nurhusain, M. (2017). Impact analysis of cooperative learning model application two stay to stray (TSTS) toward learning outcomes of mathematics. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 2(2), 46-53. DOI:10.26737/jpmi.v2i2.220.

Riza, M. (2017). Development of Educational Media Based Educational Character In the XXI Century. The 2nd International Seminar on Chemical Education 2017 September, 12-13th 2017, p. 99-106. ISBN: 978-602-73192-1-9.

Rushiana, R.A., & Iryani. (2021). Description of student learning outcomes on chemistry materials that implement chemical calculations using guided-inquiry-based modules. Edukimia, 3(1), 26-30. DOI. 10.24036/ekj.v3.i1.a217.

Rusman. (2011). Model-model Pembelajaran, Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Suardana, I N., Redhana, I W., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., & Selamat, I N. (2018). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Chemistry Learning Using Local Culture-Based 7E Learning Cycle Model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 399-412. DOI: 10.12973/iji.2018.11227a.

Suwandy, F.I., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2017). Misconceptions of reaction rates on high school level in Banjarmasin. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 07(01), 54-61. DOI:10.9790/7388-0701045461.

Wilkes, H., & Schwarzbauer J. (2010). Hydrocarbons: An Introduction to Structure, Physico-Chemical Properties and Natural Occurrence. In: Timmis K.N. (eds) Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_1.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.