Acid Base Module with SETS Approach to Train Students’ Critical Thinking Skill

Anis Mualifah, Rusmini Rusmini, Rusmini Rusmini

Abstract


Acid Base Module with SETS Approach to Train Student Critical Thinking Skills. This study aimed to develop an acid-base module with SETS approach to train students' critical thinking skills. The study used Borg & Gall Research and Development (R&D) method until the limited trial stage. The limited trial was carried out on 12 students of class XI at SMAN 1 Dongko Trenggalek. Then, the developed module was tested for its feasibility based on 3 aspects, namely validity, practicality and effectiveness. The module's validity data was obtained from the results of the assessment from two chemistry lecturers and one chemistry teacher. The module obtained validity percentages of 84.1% for content, 84.17% for presentation and 83.33% for language with a valid category. The module's practicality was obtained from the student response questionnaire results, where the practicality percentage of the module was 98.81% with a very practical category. The module's effectiveness was known from the students’ critical thinking skills improvement based on the pretest and posttest scores and obtained n-gain score average of 0.79 with high category. It is supported by the Wilcoxon test results, which obtained Asymp.Sig <0.05 (0.002 <0.05), so that Ha is accepted. So, it can be concluded that the acid-base module with the SETS approach can train students' critical thinking skills

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aikenhead, G. S. (1994). What is STS science teaching? In: Solomon, J. and Aikenhead, G.S. Ed.,. STS Education In-Ternational Perspectives on Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

Amanda, S., Muharrami, L. K., Rosidi, I., & Ahied, M. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Pembelajaran IPA Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah yang Berbasis SETS. Journal of Natural Science Education Research, 1(1), 57–64.

BSNP. (2007). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: BSNP.

Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: Why the Subject is Difficult? / Química: ¿Por qué la disciplina es difícil? Educación Química, 1–6.

Chang, R. (2010). Chemistry (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Daryanto. (2013). Menyusun Modul Bahan Ajar Untuk Persiapan Guru Dalam Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Daryanto, & Dwicahyono, A. (2014). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Depdiknas. (2008). Penulisan Modul. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Eliyawati, Sanjaya, Y., & Ramdani, A. S. (2020). Implementation of Project Oriented Problem-Based Learning (POPBL) Model Integrated with STEM to Enhance Junior High School Students’ Science Concept Mastery. Jurnal Pena Sains, 7(2). 120-129.

Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. Hermosa Beach: Measured Reasons LLC.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (8th ed.). Semarang: BPFE Universitas Diponegoro.

Hairida, & Hadi, L. (2017). Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Skills Through SETS Vision Learning. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(2), 1571–1576.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/gain Scores. Woodland Hills : Dept of Physics, Indiana University.

Hartono. (2008). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hasanah, U., & Isnawati. (2019). Validity of Salingtemas Based-Worksheet on Fungi Topic to Influence Critical Thinking Skill. BioEdu, 8(3), 20–25.

Haseli, Z., & Rezali, F. (2013). The Effect o Teaching Critical Thinking on Eductional Achievement and Test Anxiety Among Junior High School Student in Savech. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Science, 2(2), 168–175.

Hasrudin, Nasution, M. Y., & Rezeqi, S. (2015). Application of contextual learning to improve critical thinking ability of students in biology teaching and learning strategies class. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 11(3), 109–116.

Julia, D., Rosilawati, I., & Efkar, T. (2016). Pengembangan Modul berbasis Multipel Representasi pada Materi Garam dan Hidrolisis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 5(3), 65–76.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Silabus Mata Pelajaran Kimia untuk SMA/MA. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

King, F. J., Goodson, L., M. S., & Rohani, F. (2010). Assessment & Evaluation Educational Services Program: Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Washington D.C.: Educational Services Program.

Kurniawan, A. B., & Hidayah, R. (2020). Validitas Permainan Zuper Abase Berbasis Android Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Asam Basa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 9(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.23960/jppk.v9.i1.202006

Maimunah. (2017). The Use of Science Environment Technology and Society (SETS) Learning Model for Enhancing The Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 3(1), 65–73.

Minarti, I. B., Susilowati, S. M. E., & Indriyanti, D. R. (2012). Perangkat Pembelajaran Ipa Terpadu Bervisi SETS Berbasis Edutainment Pada Tema Pencernaan. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 1(2), 105–111.

Mulyani, S. D., Rudibyani, R. B., & Efkar, T. (2018). Efektivitas LKS Berbasis Multipel Representasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 7(2), 1–12.

Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495

NEA. (2012). A-Guide-to-Four-Cs. Washington D.C.: National Education Association.

Ni’mah, M., Hidayah, R., Aprianto, & Hidayati, N. (2017). Kepraktisan dan keefektifan LKPD berbasis problem based learning untuk melatihkan kemampuan literasi sains pada materi asam basa. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 9(3), 347–351.

Nugraha, D. A., & Binadja, A. (2013). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Reaksi Redoks Bervisi Sets, Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 2(1).

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results Combined Executive Summaries. PISA-OECD Publishing.

Oktaviani, M. A., & Notobroto, H. B. (2014). Perbandingan tingkat konsistensi normalitas distribusi metode Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors, Shapiro-Wilk, dan Skewness-Kurtosis. Jurnal Biometrika Dan Kependudukan, 3(2), 127–135.

Pandela, Y. S., Sunyono, & Rudibyani, R. B. (2019). Pengaruh Isu Sosio-Saintifk dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non-Elektrolit. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 8(2). 296-307.

Poedjiadi, A. (2005). Sains, Teknologi, and Masyarakat (STM). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Prastowo, A. (2013). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Putri, W. R., Supardi, Z. I., & Sudibyo, E. (2020). the Effectiveness of Learning Devices Through the Stem Approaches To Train Students ’ Critical. Jurnal Education and Development, 8(2), 281–284.

Putri, D. K., & Rusmini. (2021). Hydrocarbon and Petroleum with SETS Approach Module to Train Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i1.7839

Rachmatia, E., Aunurrahman, & Usman, A. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Kimia untuk Kecakapan Membangun dan Menggunakan Konsep Redoks dan Hidrokarbon Kelas X SMAN 3 Sungai Kakap. Journal Of Prospective Learning, 1(2), 20–31.

Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power Comparision of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov_Smirnov, Lilliefors, and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.

Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2239–2253.

Riduwan. (2015). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sari, R. M. N., Suryaningsih, S., & Yunita, L. (2019). The Correlation of Guided Inquiry Model with SETS Approach on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Edusains, 10(2), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v10i2.10268

Siswanto. (2020). Mempersiapkan Society 5.0 melalui Pembelajaran Fisika. SNPF (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika), Univeristas PGRI Madiun, 31 July 2019, Madiun

Susilawati, E., Agustinasari, Samsudin, A., & Siahaan, P. (2020). Analisis Ketreampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(1), 11–16.

Suwandayani, B. I., Akbar, S., & Hanurawan, F. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Pendidikan Karakter Kelas I di SD Negeri Kauman I Kota Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(10), 1981–1986.

Suyanti, D. R. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Kimia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Ulya, H., Rudibyani, R. B., & Efkar, T. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Kimia Berbasis Problem Solving Pada Materi Asam Basa Arrhenius. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 7(1), 129–141.

Yessi, M., Sudyana, I. N., & Fatah, A. H. (2019). Pembelajaran Asam Basa Menggunakan LKS Berbasis Learning Cycle 7E untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v10i1.5687

Yörük, N., Morgil, I., & Seçken, N. (2010). The Effects of Sience, Technology, Society, Environment (STSE) Interactions on Teaching Chemistry. Natural Science, 02(12), 1417–1424. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2010.212173

Yulistiana, Y. (2015). Penelitian Pembelajaran Berbasis SETS (Science, Environment, Technology, And Society) dalam Pendidikan Sains. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i1.169


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.