Efektivitas Model ADI terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Materi Zat Aditif dan Adiktif Ditinjau dari Gender

Desria Monica, Nina Kadaritna, Lisa Tania

Abstract


This quasi experimental research with pretest posttest non equivalent control group design aims to describe the effectiveness of the ADI learning model on additive and addictive substances to students' argumentation skills in terms of gender. The sample used in this research is class VIII.2 as experimental class and VIII.4 as control class at SMP Global Madani Bandar Lampung. The results of this study appear as the showed that the mean difference of n-Gain argumentation skills in experimental class students was significantly higher than control class both in general and from gender. The conclusion of this study is that ADI learning model is effective in increasing students' argumentation skill topic additive and addictive substance in terms of gender.

Penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan pretest postest non equivalent control group design ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan efektivitas model pembelajaran ADI pada materi zat aditif dan adiktif terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa ditinjau berdasarkan gender. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas VIII.2 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan VIII.4 sebagai kelas kontrol di SMP Global Madani Bandar Lampung. Hasil penelitian efektivitas model pembelajaran ADI, ditunjukkan oleh perbedaan rata-rata n-Gain keterampilan argumentasi siswa kelas eksperimen secara signifikan lebih tinggi daripada kelas kontrol, baik secara umum maupun dari gender. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah pembelajar  an dengan model ADI efektif meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada materi zat aditif dan adiktif ditinjau dari gender.

Kata Kunci: gender , keterampilan argumentasi, ADI, zat aditif dan adiktif

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asoodeh, M. H., M.B. Asoodeh., & M. Zarepour. 2012. The Impact of Student Centered Learning on Academic Achievement and Social Skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 560-564.

Fraenkel, R. Jack, E. W. Norman & H. H. Helen. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. The McGrawHill Companies, Inc. New York.

Ginanjar, W. S. 2015. Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Vol 20, No 1.

Grooms, J. 2011. Using Argument Driven Inquiry to Enhance Students' Argument Sophistication When Supporting a Stance in the Context of Socioscientific Issues. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Paper 3950. Florida University State.

Inch, S.E., & Warnick, B. 2006. Critical Thinking and Comunication The Use of Reason in Argumen. Pearson Education.

Jagsi, R., DeCastro, R., Griffith, K. A., Rangarajan, S., Churchill, C., Stewart, A., & Ubel, P. 2011. Similarities and differences in the career trajectories of male and female career development award recipients. Academic Medicine, 86: 1415-1421.

Michael, G. L., & Todd, A. M. 2012. Sex, Personality, and Sustainable Consumer Behaviour : Elucidating the Gender Effect. J Consum Policy. 35: 127–144.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. 2010. Argument-Driven Inquiry: A Way Promote Learning During Laboratory Activities. The Science Teacher, 78(4), 42-50.

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. 2011. Argument-Driven Inquiry As A Way to Help Student Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Explonatory Study. Science Education, 95(2), 217-257.

Saputra, B., Rizal, Yon., Nurdin 2013. Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Lampung. Vol. 1, No 5.

Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. 2006. Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in The Science Classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.

Woodzicka, J. A., Wingfield L. C., & Good, J. J. 2010. The Effects of Gender Stereotypic and Counter-Stereotypic Textbook Images on Science Performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(2): 132–14.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.