EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN POE MATERI ELEKTROLIT/NON-ELEKTROLIT DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR ORISINIL
Abstract
The quasiexperiment research using non equivalence control group design aimed to describe the effectiveness of POE learning model in order to improve the ability of the original thinking of solution electrolyte and non electrolyte materials for the students. The research sample are first year secondary student (X3 & X4) at SMA Kosgoro which were sampled by purposive sampling. The result of this research showed that of n-Gain average in the ability of the students original thinking of control class was 0.43 and in the experimental was class was 0,57. Based on t test of n-Gain average were different significantly for both of class. This research concluded that POE learning model is effective in improving the ability of the students original thinking of solution electrolyte and non electrolyte topics.
Penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan Non Equivalence Control Group Design ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan efektivitas model pembelajaran POE dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir orisinil siswa pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas X3 dan X4 di SMA Kosgoro Bandar Sribawono yang diperoleh dengan menggunakan purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata n-Gain kemampuan berpikir orisinil siswa pada kelas kontrol sebesar 0,43 dan eksperimen sebesar 0,57. Bedasarkan uji t nilai rata-rata n-Gain kedua kelas penelitian berbeda secara signifikan. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran POE efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir orisinil siswa pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non-elektrolit.
Kata Kunci: elektrolit non-elektrolit, kemampuan berpikir orisinil, POE.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andarini, T., Masykuri, M., & Sudarisman, S. 2013. Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan Pendekatan CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning) Melalui Media Flipchart dan Video ditinjau dari Kemampuan Verbal dan Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Bioedukasi FKIP UNS, 6(2): 102-119.
Awang, H., & Ramly, I. 2008. Creative Thinking Skill Approach Thourgh Problem-Based-Learning: Pedagogy and Practice in The Engineering Classroom. Journal of Human and Social Science, 3 (1): 18-23.
Campbell, E. 2015. Analyzing The Role of Visual Cues in Developing Prediction-Making skills of Third-and Ninth-Grade English Language Learners. The Catesol Language Learners, 27 (1): 53-93.
Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches Second Edition. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Djumadi, D., & Santoso., E. B. 2014. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create, and Share dan Predict Observe Explain Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 1 Gondangrejo Karanganyar Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Varia Pendidikan, 26 (1): 11-20.
Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. 2006. Critical Thinking Framework for Any Discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning Higher Education., 17 (2): 160-166.
Giriyanti, W. N., Fadiawati, N., & Kadaritna , N., Diawati, C. 2013. Peningkatan Ketrampilan mem prediksi Pada Materi Laju Reaksi Melalui Model Siklus Pembelajaran Predict-Obsserve-Explain. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 2 (2): 1-15.
Gustina, O., Fadiawati, N., Kadaritna, N., & Diawati, C. 2013. Peningkatan Ketrampilan Mempred-iksi dan Penguasaan Konsep pada Materi Termokimia Melalui Model Siklus Pembelajaran Predict-Obsserve-Explain. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 2 (2):1-14.
Kearney, M. 2004. Classroom Use of Multimedia-Supported Predict-Observe-Explain Tasks in Social Constructivist Learning Environment. Journal University of Tecnology, NSW, Australia, 34 (4): 427-457.
Kurt, S., & Ayas, A. 2012. Im-proving Students Understanding and Explaining Real Life Problems on Concepts of Reaction Rate by Using a Four Step Constructivist Approach. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4 (2): 979-992.
Liew, C. & Treagust, D.F. 1995. A predict-observe-explain teaching sequence for learning about students understanding of heat and expansion of liquids. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(1), 68-71.
Mergendoller, J R., Maxwell, N.L., & Bellisimo, Y. 2006. The Effectiveness of Problem-Based-Intruction: A Comparative Study of Instructional Methods and Student Characteristics. The Interdiscriplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning, 1 (2): 49-69.
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. 2012. Creative Thinking: Processes, Strategies an Knowledge. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 46 (1): 30-47.
Munandar, S. C. U. 2008. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Rajoo, A.S. 2010. Facilitating the Development of Students Oral Presentation Skills. Voice of Academia journal, 5 (1): 43-50.
Sudjana. 2005. Metode Statisti-ka. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sternberg, R. J. 2003. Creative Thinking in The Classroom. Journal of Education Research, 47 (3): 325-338.
Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. 2013. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Multipel Representasi dalam Membangun Model Mental Mahasiswa Topik Stokiometri Reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 3 (1): 73-86.
Tanaka, Y., & Sakamoto, Y., Sonehara N. 2008. The Effect of Criticism on Creattive Idiom. Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, Japan, 3 (1): 55-58.
Tim Penyusun. 2006. Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: BSNP.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.