Email this article 
Design of Educational Facility Service Standards in Indonesia (Case: Junior High School in Lampung Province)
Abstract
The educational facility standards in Indonesia do not meet regional needs. A strategic design aligned with regional demographics is necessary. This research aims to create verified standardized designs for educational facility services. The research uses quantitative methods with formal schools at junior high school level in Lampung Province as the research object. The research uses documentation data with secondary data analysis techniques and descriptive statistics. The research results denote (1) educational services condition facilitated by the government in Lampung Province for junior high school level according to Ministry of Education criteria is 16.20%, while according to BSN criteria is 38.87%. The amount of junior high school level standard, both according to Permendiknas and BSN criteria, is stated undersupply. (2) The standard design used is Utami version (2023), modified according to Ministry of Education and BSN criteria, using threshold changes and number of school-age population. The design is equipped with school type criteria: type A, B, and C. (3) Implementation results indicate that if the government maximizes the junior high school facilities with type A relatively then it can be declared as capable of meeting the standard needs for the number of schools, even without the involvement of private schools.
Keyword: Educational facility; Service standards; Design; Junior high school; Lampung province
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adisasmita, R. (2008). Pengembangan Wilayah, Konsep, dan Teori (Ed. 1). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Amtu, O. (2013). Manajemen Pendidikan di Era Otonomi Daerah. Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2019). Potret Pendidikan Indonesia, Statistik Pendidikan 2019. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2024). Provinsi Lampung dalam Angka 2024. Lampung: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2004). Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI) 03-1733-2004 tentang Tata Cara Perencanaan Lingkungan Perumahan di Perkotaan. Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN).
Berry, B. J. L., & Garrison, W. L. (1958). Recent Developments of
Central Place Theory. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 4(1), 107–120.
Byun, N., Choi, Y., & Choi, J. (2014). Neighborhood Unit: Effective or Obsolete? Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 13(3), 617–624.
Christaller, W. (1933). Central Places in Southern Germany. Translated by C. W. Baskin, 1966. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
De Chiara, J., & Koppelman, L. (1982). Urban Planning and Design Criteria (3rd ed.). Van Nostrand: Reinhold Company Inc.
Desriani, R. W., & Purnianti, S. (2013). Pola Ruang Area Pelayanan Sekolah Dasar di Kota Cimahi. Jurnal Permukiman, 8(2), 69–77.
DeVerteuil, G. (2000). Reconsidering the Legacy of Urban Public Facility Location Theory in Human Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 24(1), 47–69.
Getis, A., & Getis, J. (1966). Christaller’s Central Place Theory. Journal of Geography, 65(5), 220–226.
Hakim, L. (2016). Pemerataan Akses Pendidikan Bagi Rakyat Sesuai Dengan Amanat Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jurnal EduTech, 2(1), 53–64.
Hardiyansyah. (2018). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik (Konsep, Dimensi, Indikator dan Implementasinya). Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana untuk Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (SD/MI), Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTS), dan Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA). Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Meenakshi. (2011). Neighborhood Unit and its Conceptualization in the Contemporary Urban Context. Institute of Town Planners, India Journal, 8(3), 81–87.
Mujahidun. (2016). Pemerataan Pendidikan Anak Bangsa: Pendidikan Gratis Versus Kapitalisme Pendidikan. Tarbiyatuna, 7(1), 38–52.
Pravitasari, R. (2014). Sistem Informasi Geografis Pemetaan Sebaran Sekolah dan Pemerataan Pendidikan di Kabupaten Jember dengan Metode TOPSIS AHP. Skripsi. Universitas Jember.
Prasetyo, D. H., Mohamad, J., & Fauzi, R. (2016). Discovering Public Preferences for School Location in Surabaya. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 160–167.
Putri, R. A., Subulussalam, M. D., Rahayu, M. J., & Ramadhani, A. K. (2016). A Spatial Analysis for Assessing the Suitability of Elementary School as Social Infrastructure at the Neighbourhood Unit Scale in Supporting Child-Friendly Surakarta. Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, 3(1), 33–52.
Rushton, G. (1979). Optimal Location of Facilities. Wentworth: COMPress, Inc.
Setiyanto, A., & Irawan, B. (2015). Pembangunan Berbasis Wilayah: Dasar Teori, Konsep Operasional dan Implementasinya di Sektor Pertanian. In E. Pasandaran, D. Nursyamsi, K. Suradisastra, S. Mardianto, & Haryono (Eds.), Pembangunan Pertanian Berbasis Ekoregion (pp. 62–82). Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development (IAARD) Press.
Sitorus, L. F. I. S. (2009). Analisis Sebaran Sekolah Menengah dalam Upaya Peningkatan Aksesibilitas. Tesis. Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Teitz, M. B. (1968). Toward A Theory of Urban Public Facility Location. Papers of The Regional Science Association, 21, 35–51.
Utami, R. K. S. (2023). Pemodelan Optimalisasi Pelayanan Pendidikan Berbasis Zonasi Sekolah (Kasus: Kota Yogyakarta, Provinsi DIY). Disertasi. Fakultas Geografi, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960%2Fjpg.v12i2.31371
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
INDEXING
