PENERAPAN ONGOING ASSESSMENT UNTUK MENINGKATKAN METAKOGNISI DAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA

Istika Sandra Sari, I Dewa Putu N, Undang Rosidin

Abstract


Through this classroom action research it is expected to be an alternative to increase the cognitive skill and the result of student’s physics learning. Before holding the research, an interview was done to student’s then the researcher used instruments which were already valid and reliable to know the metacognitive skill of student’s. After the research process, it was revealed that there was an increasing of the student’s metacognitive skill. They were in circle 1, 2 and 3 which categorized as “good”. In the cognitive aspect there was a significant increase and they are categorized “complete” in the psychomotor aspect, there was also an increase of the student’s learning achievement but it was not so significant. In the other hand, the affective aspect of student’s learning activity, there was also an increase.

Melalui penelitian tindakan kelas ini, diharapkan dapat menjadi alternatif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan metakognisi dan hasil belajar fisika siswa. Sebelum penelitian, dilakukan wawancara terhadap siswa, kemudian ditinjaklanjuti dengan menggunakan instrumen yang telah valid dan reliabel untuk mengetahui keterampilan metakognisi siswa. Setelah proses penelitian diperoleh data peningkatan keterampilan metakognisi dan hasil belajar siswa setiap siklusnya, yaitu pada siklus I, II dan III dengan kategori “baik”. Pada aspek kognitif terjadi peningkatan yang sangat baik setiap siklusnya dengan kategori “tuntas”. Pada aspek psikomotor hasil belajar siswa juga menunjukkan adanya peningkatan meskipun tidak signifikan. Sedangkan pada hasil belajar aspek afektif juga terjadi peningkatan.

Kata kunci: metacognitive skill, ongoing assessment, penelitian tindakan kelas.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Angelo, T. A. dan Cross, K. P. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2008. Dasardasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Chapman, Carolyn dan King, Rita. 2005. Differentiated Assessment Strategies-One Tools Doesn’t Fit All. California: Corwin Press. INC.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono.2009. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Joslin, Cara. 2010. Teaching for Understanding: Ongoing Assessment. Harvard University Graduet School of Education and Project Hero. June 2010. Tina Blythe. (online), (http://www.learner.org/workshops/socialstudies/pdf/session7/7. Ongoing Assesment.pdf. Diakses tanggal 27 Januari 2013)

Kumala, Siti Ayu. 2011. Implementasi Ongoing Assessment Berbasis Reciprocal Teaching untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Metakognisi dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa. Skripsi. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

Saputri, Novika 2010. Pengaruh Fasilitas di Rumah dan Motivasi Belajar pada Pembelajaran Fisika melaui Metode Pemberian Tugas Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X Semester Genap SMA Negeri 1 Trimurjo Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010. Skripsi. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

Sukardi, H.M. 2008. Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Trianto. 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Vacca, Richard T. dan Jo Anne L. 1989. Content Area Reading. London : Scott Foresman and Company.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



  Lisensi Creative Commons
Copyright of the article is reserved by the author(s). Published by the Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung in Collaboration with the Physical Society of Indonesia (since 2019).  This article is an open-access article under the Creative Commons non-commercial-share-alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.