The Practicality and Effectiveness of the E-Worksheet with Creative Inquiry Based and HOTS Oriented “3D PageFlip” for Online Learning
Abstract
Most students experienced difficulties in understanding electricity learning materials in online learning because this was delivered asynchronously without observation/investigation and interaction with its learning environment. To overcome this problem, a teaching material that is able to deliver natural facts and phenomena to display in one place/space, the Electronic Student’s Working Sheet (ESWS) with 3D PageFlip is required. Material elaboration in this ESWS follows creative inquiry syntax with an orientation to the higher order of thinking skill (HOTS). The objective of this research was to describe the practicality and effectiveness of the ESWS with Creative Inquiry-Based and HOTS Oriented 3D PageFlip for online learning in improving self-efficacy and communication skills. This research used a static one-group pretest-posttest design. The research population was students in Public Senior High School 1 in Airnaningan, Tanggamus district, Lampung province. Two classroom samples were taken with cluster random sampling. Samples were divided into experiment and control groups. The experiment classroom was taught by using the ESWS with creative inquiry-based and HOTS oriented 3D PageFlip and the control group was taught by using a regular student’s working sheet containing questions and problems for exercises. Data were analyzed descriptively to describe self-efficacy understanding and communication skills. The differences in self-efficacy understanding and communication skills between experiment and control classrooms were analyzed with an independent sample t-test. The research result showed that the ESWS with creative inquiry-based and HOTS oriented 3D PageFlip was practical to use in physics learning with an average implementation score of 87.03 and with very positive students’ responses (94.44%). The ESWS with creative inquiry-based and HOTS oriented 3D PageFlip was also effective in improving self-efficacy and communication with n-gains of 0.77 and 0.80 respectively and they belonged to the high n-gain category.
Keywords: Practicality, Effectiveness, Communication
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpf.v10.n1.202201
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abraham, A. (2016). Gender and creativity: an overview of psychological and
neuroscientific literature. Springer Science, 2.
Agustian, Opra, N., Asrizal, dan Kamus, Z., (2013). Pembuatan Bahan Ajar Fisika Berbasis
WEB Pada Konsep Termodinamika Untuk Pembelajaran Menurut Standar Proses
Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Pillar Of Physics Education, 2.
Amabile, T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., Herron R. (1996). Assessing the Work
Environment for Creativity . The Academy of Management Journal, Volume 39 Issues
, 1154-1184.
Anonim. Diakses Tanggal 27 April 2019. Software 3D Pageflip Professional.
http://www.3D-PageFlip.com .
Arikunto, S. 2014. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aulls, M. M. & Shore, B.M. (2008). Inquiry In Education: The Conceptual Foundation for
Research as a Curricular Imperative. Laurence erlbaum Associates. authentic
learning.
Baer, J. (2003). Impact of the Core Knowledge Curriculum on creativity. Creativity Research
Journal, 15, 297-300.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy – The Exercise of Control (Fifth Printing, 2002). New York
: W.H. Freeman & Company.
Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction, Fifth Edition.
New York : Longman.
Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P. , Malone. P.S., (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy
beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A
study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology.
Dahar. R. W. 2006. Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Dawson, K., Cavanaugh, C. & Ritzhaupt, A.D. (2006). Florida’s EETT leveraging laptops
initiative and its impact on teaching practices. Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 41(2).
Dinasita, P. Wilda, S. Muhaimin. 2017. Pengembangan e-LKS Berbasis Metakognisi
Menggunakan 3D Pageflip Pada Materi Reaksi Redoks Di kelas X MIPA SMAN 1
Muaro Jambi. Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Jambi.
Fraenkel, R. J, Wallen, E. N, dan Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research
in Education : Eight Edition. Mc Graw-Hill Companies,Inc.
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and
authentic learning. Thousand Oaks, CA. Corwin Press.
Hamidah. (2014). Pengaruh Self Efficacy terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik.
Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Tersedia: http://seminaruny.ac.id. [Online]. [26 Juli 2019]
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. American Educational Research
Association.
-------. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics
with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on Mathematics and Spatial
Visualization. Journal International Indiana University, 1(1).
Haury, D.L. (2002). Teaching Science Through Inquiry. [online]. Tersedia:
Http:///www.ericse.org/digests/dse93-4.html. 10-11-2011. Journal of Baltic Science
Education, 16(6), 999-1008.
Kemendikbud. 2014. Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementrian
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Lestari, Ika. 2013. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi. Padang: Akademia.
Maradona. (2013). Analisis Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA Islam
Samarinda Pada Pokok Bahasan Hidrolisis Melalui Metode Eksperimen. Prosiding
Seminar Nasional Kimia, ISBN: 978-602-19421-0- 9.(62-70).
Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual
Learning Grains in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variable” in Diagnostice Pretest
Scores. American Journal Physics, Vol 70 (12).
National Research Council. (2000). Inquirí and the National Sciences Educational Standards.
Washington DC: National Academic Press neuros cientific literature. Brain Imaging
and Behavior, 10(2), 609-618.
Permendikbud No. 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Rustaman, N. Y. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: Universitas Negeri
Malang.
Setiawan, D., T. Belawati, I. M. Sadjati, D. Andriani, B. A. Pribadi, dan D. Andriyani. 2012.
Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.
Solso, R.L., Maclin, O.H., Maclin, K.M. (2008). Cognitive Psychology. Eight edition. USA:
Pearson Education Inc.Their Understanding of Electric Current via Multiple
Analogies.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sujadi. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suryadi, Edi. 2004. Modul Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berkomunikasi. Bandung:
Lembaga Penelitian UPI.
Tilaar, H.A.R. 2006. Standarisasi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta.
Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., & Selby E. C. (2002). Assessing creativity: A guide for
education. Sarasota, FL: The National Research Center on the gifted and talented.
Trianto. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wina Sanjaya. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Wena, M., (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer: Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual
Operasional. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Woolfolk. (2008). Educational Psychology. Active Learning Edition Tenth Edition. Boston :
Allyn & Bacon.
Yusnaeni, Corebima, A.D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative thinking of low
academic student undergoing search solve create and share learning integrated with
metacognitive strategy. International Journal of Instruction.
Zulkosky, K. (2012). Self Efficacy : A Concept Analysis. In Journal Compilation Vol. 44
No.2.(93 – 102).
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N.M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving Creative
Thinking Skills of Students through Differentiated Science Inquiry Integrated with
Mind Map. Journal of Turkish Science Education
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022
Copyright of the article is reserved by the author(s). Published by the Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung in Collaboration with the Physical Society of Indonesia (since 2019). This article is an open-access article under the Creative Commons non-commercial-share-alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
