CBT HOTS Assessment Instrument Model: Teacher Perception Analysis of a Role of Illustration as Well as Quiz and Question Setting According to HOTS
Abstract
21st Century Learning requires HOTS learning to improve students' higher-order thinking skills, in addition to learning that promotes HOTS assessment must also promote HOTS. However, there are still many teachers who have not done HOTS who are able to stimulate students' high-level thinking skills well. This study discusses teacher perceptions about HOTS CBT assessment instrument models about the role of illustrations and quizzes and questions set in measuring HOTS. This type of research is a mixed method. The mixed-method strategy used is Sequential Explanatory Strategy. This research was conducted on five high school physics teachers in Metro City. Data collection using teacher perception respondents questionnaire conducted in April 2019 by five high school physics teachers in Metro City. The data collected was analyzed descriptively quantitatively. As many as 96% of teachers strongly agree that the Computer Based Test Model (CBT) involves video illustrations, animations, simulation questions, 80% of teachers agree that describing items can enrich thinking levels (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6) and GPA for considered, as well as 96% of teachers strongly agree with the form of illustration of video items, animations, complications can be removed verbalism. In addition to questions and types of questions, quizzes and question settings are considered necessary by teachers to improve higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Based on the data obtained the validation instrument was developed to obtain the best types of questions, stimuli, as well as quizzes and question settings in improving students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS).
Keywords: HOTS CBT assessment, stimulation, 3 types of questions, quizzes and question settings
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afandi, T. J. & R. Afriani. 2016. Implementasi Digital-Age Literacy dalam Pendidikan Abad 21 Di Indonesia. Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Sains (pp. 113–120). 2016.
Australian Council for Educational Research. (2015). Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills. Melbourne: ACER.
Bjornsson, J.K., 2008. Changing Icelandic national testing from traditional paper and pencil based tests to computer based assessment: some background, challenges and problems to overcome. In: F.S. Scheuermann and A.G. Pereira, eds. Toward a research agenda on computer based assessment: challenges and needs for European educational measurement. Ispra (VA), Italy: European Commission, 6–9.
Brookhart, S.M. 2010. How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
H. J. Andi., Ulfatul. F., Nilna. M. D. & Mohamad. L. 2019. The Implementation of Project Based Learning Model Assisted with WhatsApp Messenger. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika. 7(1): 1-6.
He, Q. and Tymms, P. 2005. A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6): 419–429.
D. Pratiwi, Agus. S. & Eko. S. 2019. Enhancing Critical Thinking using LCDS-Based Interactive Electronic School Book in Physics. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1): 7-18.
Huang, Y.M., Lin, Y.T., and Cheng, S.C. 2009. An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers & Education, 52(1): 53–67.
Martin, R. 2008. New possibilities and challenges for assessment through the use of technology. In: F.S. Scheuermann and A.G. Pereira, eds. Toward a research agenda on computer based assessment: challenges and needs for European educational measurement. Ispra (VA), Italy: European Commission. Gardner, J., ed. 2006. Assessment and learning. London: Sage Publications.
Masek, A. & Yamin, S. 2011. The effect of problem based learning on critical thinking ability: a theoretical and empirical review. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1): 215-221. Retrieved from www.irssh.com. On 20 Juni 2019).
Mukminan. 2014. Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Pendayagunaan Teknologi Pendidikan. Semin. Nas. Teknol. Pendidik. pp. 1–10, 2014.
N. Milaturrahmah, Mardiyana, and I. Pramudya. 2017. Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) as Mathematics Learning Approach in 21st Century. 4th Int. Conf. Res. Implementation, Educ. Math. Sci. (4th ICRIEMS), 2017.
Paek, P. 2005. Recent trends in comparability studies: pearson educational measurement. Retrieved from: http://www.pearsonsolutions.com/downloads/research/TrendsCompStudies_rr0505.pdf . On 20 Juni 2019.
Schraw, Gregory & Robinson, D.H. 2011. Assessment Of Higer Order Thinking Skillss. America: Information Age Publishing.
Smoline, D.V. 2008. Some problems of computer-aided testing and ‘interview-like tests. Computers & Education, 51 (2): 745–756.
Thelwall, M. 2000. Computer-based assessment: a versatile educational tool. Computers & Education,34(1): 37–49.
Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E. & Economides, A.A. 2008. The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 50(4): 1319–1330.
Widana, I Wayan. 2017. Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment (Hots). Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 32(3): 2442-4919.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020
Copyright of the article is reserved by the author(s). Published by the Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lampung in Collaboration with the Physical Society of Indonesia (since 2019). This article is an open-access article under the Creative Commons non-commercial-share-alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
