COMPARING LITERARY AND NON-LITERARY TEXTS THROUGH CRITICAL READING APPROACH ON READING COMPREHENSION
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) menginvestigasi apakah ada perbedaan pemahaman siswa yang diajar menggunakan teks literary dan non-literary melalui pendekatan membaca critis. (2) menemukan teks manakah yang paling effektif untuk memahami bacaan. Untuk mencapai tujuan ini, peneliti menggunakan studi kuantitatif. Dua kelas dijadikan sampel, yaitu kelas experimen satu menggunakan teks literary dan kelas experimen dua menggunakan teks non-literary. Terdapat dua instrument, yaitu tes reading dan interview. Hasil dari analisis data menunjukan bahwa terdapat perbedaan tingkat pemahaman siswa yang diajar menggunakan teks literary dan non-literary melalui pendekatan membaca kritis. kemudian, teks literary lebih effektif dari non-literary untuk memahami bacaan. Hasil tes hipotesis menunjukan bahwa T-hitung lebih tinggi dari T-tabel (4.402 > 2.002). Jadi disimpulkan bahwa H0 ditolak dan menunjukan bahwa teks literary lebih baik dari non-literary untuk meningkatkan membaca kritis siswa.
This study aimed at (1) investigating whether there is a significant difference between the students reading comprehension achievement using literary text and non-literary text through critical reading approach. (2) finding which of the two materials that is more effective in reading comprehension. To achieve this goal, the researcher carried out quantitative study. Two classes have been taken: experimental class one using literary text and experimental class two using non-literary text. There were two instruments used in this research: reading test and interview. The results of data analysis showed there was a significant difference of between the students reading achievement taught by literary text and those taught by non-literary text through critical reading approach. Then, literary text was more effective than non-literary text. Hypothesis test showed that T-value was higher than T-table (4.402 > 2,002). It can be concluded null-hypothesis is rejected. It can be inferred that literary text is better than non-literary text for encouraging students critical reading.
Keywords: critical reading approach, literary text, non-literary text, reading comprehension.Full Text:
PDFReferences
Clark, R. 1993. Developing practices of resistance: critical reading for students of politics in D. Graddol, L. Thompson, and M. Byram (eds.), Language and culture. Clevedon Avon: BAAL/Multilingual Matters, 113-22.
Glenn S, Levine. 2012. The Study of Literary Texts at the Nexus of Multiple Histories in the Intermediate College-Level German Classroom. L2 Journal Vol. 4. No. 1. 2012.
Khatib, M. 2012. Critical Thinking Skill through Literary and Non literary texts in English classes. Iran: Allameh TabatabaI Uniersity.
Makey, S.1991. Literature in ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 16.4, 68.
Mochtari, Reza. 2014. The comarative study of literary vs. non-literary text and iranian EFL learners performanceon cloze test of inference. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 163-174, January 2014
Shokrolahi, M. 2014. The effect of literary text Vs Non-literary text through critical reading approach on the Reading Comprehension Development of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 215-220, January 2014.
Spolksy, E. 1989. I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him teaching resisting reading. ELT Journal 43.3, 173-9.
Thistlewaite, L.L. 1990.Critical reading for at risk students. Journal of Reading, 33.3, 586-592.
Thom, N. T. T. 2008. Using Literary Text In Language Teaching. VNU Journal of Science, Foregn language 24, 120-126.
Wallace. C. 1990. When a learner attempts to become literate in a second language, what is he or she attempting? TESL TALK.20.1, 29-30.
Widdowson, H. G. 1978. Teaching language and communication. London: Oxford University Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 U-JET