A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE AND MAKING INFERENCE

Dini Kurnia Nursepti, Ujang Suparman, Sudirman Sudirman

Abstract


The objectives of the research are (1) to investigate whether there was difference of students’ reading comprehension achievement between those taught through predictive technique and those taught through making inferences technique, and (2) to determine which one of the two techniques was more effective for teaching reading comprehension. The researcher applied pre-test and post-test control group design. This experimental method dealt with two groups: the experimental class and control class. The sample of the research was the second grade of SMAN 1 Kotagajah. The findings of the research revealed that there was difference of students’ reading comprehension achievement between those taught through predictive technique and those taught through making inferences technique. In addition, predictive technique was more effective than making inferences technique to encourage the students’ motivation to be more active during the process of learning reading. It can be seen from the results of post-test in the experimental class was 81.50 which higher than the mean score of students’ post-test in the control class which was 72.44, with mean difference of score was 9.06. The value of two tailed significant was 0.000. It means that H 0 was rejected and H1 was accepted since 0.000 < 0.05.

 

Keywords: making inferences technique, predictive technique, reading.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anne. D. 2003. Teaching by principles an interactive approach. San Fransisco State University. Longman.

Beers, S. & Howell, L. 2003. Reading strategies for the content areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Beverly, C. 2006. Comprehensive high school reading methods. New York: Bell and Howel Company.

Carver. P. 1990. Communicative through reading. Kansas: University of Kansas Applied English Center.

Cowan, S. 2010. Teaching of reading: Techniques for instruction and assessment. From: http://csuchicodspace.calstate. edu/Htm, retrieved on April 24nd, 2012.

Doyle. 2004. Teaching of reading. New York: CBS College Publishing.

Forsten, Char, Grant, Jim, & Hollas, Betty. (2003). Differentiating textbooks. Peterborough, NH: Crystal Strings Books.

Hancocok. J. 1987. How to teach English. London: Longman.

Hatch, E. and Farhady, H. 1982. Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. London: Newbury House, Inc.

Howart, P. 2006. Making reading communicative. From: http://academic.cuesta. edu.Htm. retrieved on April 19th, 2012.

Krashen. S. D. and Tracy T. 1988. The natural approach. London: Prentice-Hall, Inc. From: http://academic .cuesta.edu/acasupp/as/302.HTM. retrieved on March 21st, 2012.

Kathleen. 1986. Reading skills for college students. Engelwood Clipps, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Rushel, M. 2004. How to be a more successful reading. Boston: Boston & Heinle Publisher


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)