THE ROLE OF METACOGNITIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES IN STUDENTS' READING COMPREHENSION

Rizky Bunga Listari, Bambang Setiyadi, Budi Kadaryanto

Abstract


The objectives of this research are to find whether there is any significant correlation between metacognitive learning strategies and students’ reading comprehension and to find out how frequent students have applied each metacognitive learning strategies in their learning reading. This research was conducted at the first grade of SMA Negeri 7 Bandar Lampung. This is a quantitative co-relation study that focused on the product (result of the test). The result showed that the students used arranging and evaluating more frequently than centering and planning strategies. The mean score of arranging and evaluating are 4.88 and 3.48 which mean these strategies are frequently used. The calculation showed that the coefficient correlation (r) was 0.924 which mean that there is high correlation between metacognitive learning strategies and students’ reading comprehension. It indicates that the teachers need to introduce to the learners about metacognitive learning strategies to succeed in reading.

 

Keywords: Reading comprehension, arranging, evaluating, centering, planning, metacognitive learning strategies.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Dallman,R. 1982. Teaching of Reading. New York: CBS College Publishing.

Depdiknas. 2006. Materi Sosialisasi dan Penelitian Kurikulum tingkat satuan

Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Diknas.

Hedge, T. 2003. Teaching and Learning in the language classroom.

London: Oxford University Press.

Mc. Worther, Kk. 1989. College Reading and Study Skills. Ilion’s: Scott

Foresman Company.

O’Malley, Michael J.& Chamot,A.U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge-London: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, Rebeca L, 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every eacher Should know, New York: Newburry House Publisher.

Oxford, Rebecca L, 1994. Language learning strategies. ERIC Clearing house on languageAnd linguistics. Washington DC.

Richards & R. W. Schmidt (eds), Language and Communication , 2-14. New York:Longman.

Setiyadi, Ag. B. 2006. Metode penelitian untuk pengajaran bahasa asing.

Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Simanjuntak, E. G. 1998. Developing reading skils for English second language students. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Shohamy, E. 1985. A practical handbook in language testing for the second languageteachers. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.

Smith, F. 1982. Understanding reading. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Universitas Lampung. 2000. Pedoman penulisan karya ilmiah.

Bandar Lampung: Unila Press.

Vaidya, Sheila R. Metacognitive learning stategis for students with learning disabilities. Retrivied March 2000. From he world wide web: http//www.britannica.cp,/

Wenden, Anita and Joan Rubin, 1990. Learning Strategies in Language Learning.

London Prentice Hall,int.

Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)