THE ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ERROR
Abstract
Abstract
: Negative and interrogative forms are the important elements of Englishgrammars that have to be mastered by SMP students. The learners need to have
subtantial capability of English grammar in order that they are able to speak and
write correctly.
Therefore, the objectives of this research are (1) to identify the frequencies of
occurance of the students’ grammatical errors based on surface strategy taxonomy
found in their sentences, (2) to identify the frequencies of occurance of students’
grammatical errors based on developmental category that are found in their
sentences, and (3) to find out which types of errors were mostly made by the
students. Descriptive method was used in this research, where the data were taken
from the students to draw conclusions. This research was conducted at SMP
Negeri 8 bandar Lampung. The subject of the research was class VIII.H consisting
of 34 students. The data gained were further analyzed based on surface strategy
taxonomy and developmental category.
Having analyzed the data, it is found that the students commited four types of
errors based on surface strategy taxonomy and developmental category, the
highest frequency of error types based on surface strategy taxonomy is
misformation error (63,17%) followed by misordering errors (23,36%), addition
errors (11,34%) and misordering errors (2,27%). While based on the
developmental category, the errors are: pre-systematic stage (44,75%), systematic
stage (33,14%) and post-systematic stage (22,09%).
The result shows that the highest number of errors occured is misformation. This
Indicates that students have more serious problems in using grammar especially
tenses in present tenses. They might also be influenced by Indonesian grammar.
And based on developmental category the most frequent errorr occured is presystematic
stage. This might be due to the students’ lack of knowledge about
grammar. The errors students produced were possibly caused by some factors
such as insufficient grammar mastery, lack of knowledge of present tenses and
lack of awareness. In line with the result, it is suggested that English teachers
should not ignore the errors made by them. The teachers can give remedial
teaching for the students and provide some tasks or exercises which enable them
to practice using tenses.
Key words : Students errors, present tenses sentences, negative and interrogative
2
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Azar, Betty Schramper. 1989. Understanding and Using English Grammar. New
Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.
Biber, D. et al. 1999. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London:
Longman.
Brown, H. Douglas. 1980. Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. New
Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Corder, S. Pit. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. New York: Oxford
University press.
Dulay et al. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University press.
Finochiaro. 1973. Guide for Teacher. The Foreign Language Learning. New
York: Regents Publishing Company. Inc.
George and Burk. 1980. How to Teach Grammar. Longman. Toronto: Green and
Co:
Hendrickson, James M. 1979. Error Analysis and Error Correction in Language
Teaching. Singapore: Seamo Regional Language Centre.
Hermawan, Anton. 1997. Uraian Praktis Tenses 16 Bentuk Waktu. Surabaya:
Arkola.
Hornby, A.S. 1975. Guide to Pattern and Usage in English. Second Edition. New
York: Oxford University press.
Lado, Robert. 1968. Language Teaching. A scientific Approach. New York: Mc
Grew Hill. Inc.
Lampung University. 2005. Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Universitas
Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Unila Press.
Murphy, Raymond. 2007. Essential Grammar in Use, New Edition. Cambridge:
Cambridge University press.
Napitu, Betty Tresya M. 2012. An Analysis of Students’ grammatical Errors in
Recount Text Writing at The First Grade of SMA Negeri 13 Bandar
Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University.
Rivers, Wilga M. 1970. Teaching Foreign Language Skill. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press.
Setiyadi, A.G. Bambang. 2006. Metode Penelitian Untuk Pengajaran Bahasa
Asing; Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Penerbit
Graha Ilmu.
Stainly, Shimkin. 1988. Second Langage Learning and Teaching. London:
Edward Arnold Publisher.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1988. Pengajaran Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa
. Bandung: Angkasa.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)