THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JIGSAW TECHNIQUE IN ENGLISH

Desti Mulya Sari, Bambang Setiyadi, Hartati Hasan

Abstract


The objectives of this research are to improve (1) students speaking ability (2) students speaking activity and (3) the quality of teachers performance. The subject of this research is the second grade students of SMAN 2 Bandar Lampung, class XI IPS 1. An action research was carried out in order to improve students speaking ability by using Jigsaw Technique in English speaking class. There were two indicators that were used in this research, i.e. learning product and learning process. The result of the research shows that Jigsaw Tehnique improves the students speaking ability. In term of learning product, in cycle 1, students average speaking score was 61,8 and in cycle 2, it was 67,05. In learning process, it was found that there were some students who could not comprehend the text because the students lacked of vocabulary in cylce 1. But in cycle 2, all of the students could comprehend the text well and focuss on the activities. They became more active in speaking class because the students were given different style of Jigsaw Technique.

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan (1) kemampuan bicara siswa (2) aktivitas bicara siswa dan (3) kualitas performa guru. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada siswa-siswi kelas 2 IPS 1 SMAN 2 Bandar Lampung. Penelitian tindak kelas digunakan sebagai metode untuk meningkatkan kemampuan bicara siswa melalui teknik Jigsaw dalam kelas bicara bahasa Inggris. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa ada kenaikan pada kemampuan bicara siswa. Terdapat dua indikator yang digunakan pada penelitian ini, yaitu produk pembelajaran dan proses pembelajaran. Pada produk pembelajaran di siklus pertama, skor rata-rata siswa adalah 61,8 dan di siklus ke-dua adalah 67,05. Pada proses pembelajaran, ditemukan bahwa ada beberapa siswa yang tidak dapat memahami teks dikarenakan rendahnya pembendaharaan kosakata yang dimiliki. Tetapi di siklus 2, semua siswa dapat memahami isi teks dengan baik dan fokus pada kegiatan mereka. Mereka menjadi lebih aktif dalam kelas bicara karena siswa diberikan teknik Jigsaw dengan style yang berbeda.

Kata kunci: jigsaw teknik, peningkatan, bicara


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allyn and Bacon. 1999. Rhetorical Grammar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/grammar

Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Aronson, E. (2008). Jigsaw Classroom. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.jigsaw.org.

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2010). Social psychology (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Byrne, Don. 1984. Teaching Oral English. New Jersey: Longman Group Ltd.

Burkart, G. 1998. Modules for the professional preparation of teaching assistants in foreign languages. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Campbell, K., and Herting, K. 2012. If You Cant Manage Them, You Cant Teach Them. Incentive Publication.

Colorado State University. 1993-2012. Writing@CSU is an open-access.Colorado State University.

Desmond Allison. 1999. Language Testing and Evaluation. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Depdiknas.2002. Pendekatan Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning). Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Harris, David. 1974. English as Second Language. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill Inc.

Lado, Robert. 1974. Language Testing. London: Longman.

Setiyadi, Ag. B. 2006. Metode Penelitian untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Shohamy, E. 1985. A Practical Handbook in Language Testing for the Second Language Teacher. Tel Aviv University.

Tewksbury, B. On the Cutting Edge - Professional Development for Geoscience Faculty (Designing Effective and Innovative Courses). Hamilton College. http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/treatment/clearule.htm


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)