INCREASING STUDENTS' VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BY USING SUBSTITUTION AND CUED RESPONSE DRILLS

Diena Yashinta, Hartati Hasan, Huzairin Huzairin

Abstract


Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan apakah ada peningkatan pencapaian kosakata siswa setelah diajar menggunakan teknik substitution and cued response drills. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMP Negeri 10 Bandar Lampung, kelas VIIC terdiri dari 38 siswa. Data diperoleh dari nilai pretest-posttest dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan t-test melalui SPSS versi 17.0. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata pretest siswa adalah 58.42 sedangkan nilai rata-rata posttest adalah 80.98. Nilai signifikan (p=0.000, p<0.005), nilai t 12.536. Ini menunjukkan bahwa hipotesis diterima. Berdasarkan data analisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa ada peningkatan pencapaian dalam pemahaman membaca siswa setelah diajarkan dengan menggunakan teknik substitution and cued response drills.

The aim of this research is to find out whether there is an increase of students’ vocabulary achievement after being taught using substitution and cued response drills technique. The subjects of this reseach were the first grade students of SMP Negeri 10 Bandar Lampung, VIIC, consisted 38 students. The data were collected by using pretest-posttest design and analyzed using Repeated Measure t-test with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. The result shows that the students’ mean score of pretest is 58.42 while the mean score of posttest is 80.98. The significant value (2 tailed) was (p=0.000, p<0.005), t-value was 12.536. It showed that hypothesis was accepted. It is concluded that there is an increase of students’ vocabulary achievement after being taught using substitution and cued response drills.

Keywords: content words, students’ achievement, substitution and cued response drills.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Elsjelyn, E. R. 2010. English Made Easy. Jakarta: Kesaint Blanc Publishing.

Fries, C. C. 1975. Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Michigan: University Press.

Harmer, J. 2004. How to Teach Vocabulary. New York: Longman.

Hatch, E. and Farhady, H. 1982. Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistic. London: New Burry House.

Murcia, M. C. 1987. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Massachusetts: Newburry House Publishers, Inc. Rowley.

Napa, P. A. 1991. Vocabulary Development Skill. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Nissa, A. 2012. Increasing Students’ Vocabulary through Total Physical Response at the Fifth Grade of SD Negeri 1 Tanjung Agung Bandar Lampung. Bandar Lampung: A Script.

Novita, R. D. 2011. A Comparative Study of Students’ Vocabulary of Job Achievement Between the Students Who are Taught through Information Gap Technique and Those Taught through Translation Technique at First Grade of SMPN 10 Bandar Lampung. Bandar Lampung: A Script.

Putra, W. H. 2012. Improving the Students’ Listening Comprehension through Drill Techniques in the First Grade Students of SMP Negeri 2 Bandar Lampung. Bandar Lampung: A script.

Rodgers, T. S. 1969. On Measuring Vocabulary Difficulty: An Analysis of Item Variables in Learning Russian-English Vocabulary Pairs. IRAL. 7:327-343

Setiyadi, Ag. B. 2006. Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Setiyadi, Ag. B. 2006. Metode Penelitian untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Wallace, M. J. 1986. Teaching Vocabulary. New York: Haineman Educational Book Ltd.

Wilkins, D. 1983. Second Language Learning and Teaching. London: Edwar Arnold Publisher.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)