THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING

Esti Hayuningtyas, Huzairin Huzairin, Budi Kadaryanto

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) menemukan apakah mengajar menggunakan tekhnik STAD dapat memperbaiki pemahaman membaca siswa, dan (2) meneliti aktivitas siswa dalam proses belajar mengajar melalui tekhnik STAD. Subjek dalam penelitin ini adalah siswa SMA Negeri 1 Gunung Pelindung kelas XI yang terdiri dari 31 siswa kelas IPA2. One-group pre test post test digunakan untuk menganalisis signifikan perbedaan. Selain itu, observasi dilaksanakan untuk melihat aktivitas siswa dalam proses belajar mengajar. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa rata –rata pre test adalah 55.56 sedangkan rata-rata post test 64.91. Nilai signifikan (p=0.000, p<0.05). Ini menunjukkan bahwa hipotesis diterima. Dengan demikian, tekhnik STAD dapat digunakan dan direkomendasikan sebagai tekhnik untuk mengajar khususnya di kelas membaca.

The research is aimed to (1) find out whether teaching using STAD can improve students’ reading comprehension, (2) to investigate students’ activity in teaching learning process using STAD technique. The subject of this research was the second grade student of SMAN 1 Gunung Pelindung consisting 31 students in class IPA2. One group pre-test post-test design was carried out to analyze the significant difference. Based on the result of the research, it can be reported that the mean of the pre-test is 55.56 while the mean of post-test is 64.91. The significant (2-tailed) value was (p=0.000, p<0.05) it showed that the hypothesis was accepted. Therefore, STAD technique can be applied and recommended as the technique to teach in reading class especially.

 

Keywords: aspects of reading, reading comprehension, STAD technique.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. 2006. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Bondanza, et al. 1998. Means of improving reading comprehension. (Available through E-Subscribe).

Brown, H D. 2001.”Teaching by Principles” An Interactive Approach Language Pedagogy. San Francisco: San Francisco University Press.

Hatch, E. and Farhady, H. 1982. Research Design and Statistic for Applied Linguistic. London: New Burry House, Inc.

Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 1994. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning, 4th ed. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R.T, and Johnson, H.E. 1998. The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. 1999. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kessler and Kagan, S. 1992. Cooperative Learning Inc. Kessler (Ed) Cooperative Language Learning: A Teacher’s resource book (pp.1-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Newman, F. M. and Thompson, J. 1987. Effects of Cooperadv in nA hi vementin Secondary Schools: A Summary of Research. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Nuttal, C. 1985. Teaching Reading Skills in Foreign Language. London: Heineman Education Book.

Slavin, R. 1994. Educational Psychology Theory and Practice. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.

Slavin, R. 1995. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

Slavin, R. 2000. Using Student Team Learning. 4th ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of School.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)