Incorporating Problem Solving Tasks Grouped According to Different Proficiency Levels in Cooperative Learning Procedures to Enhance Quality and Quantity of Students’ Spoken Interactions

Rahmiati Isnaini, Hery Yufrizal, Mahpul mahpul

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur kualitas dan quantitas dari interaksi mahasiswa setelah diterapkannya system pengelompokkan berdasarkan tingkat kemahiran mahasiswa  (proficiency levels) dalam tugas yang berbasis pemecahan masalah (problem solving task) berdasarkan  kerjasama (cooperative learning) yang digunakan pada pengajaran kemampuan berbicara (speaking). Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif digunakan untuk meneliti satu kelas mahasiswa yang mengambil English 1 sebagai mata kuliah wajib di IBI Darmajaya. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan mencakup pretest dan posttest, serta serangkaian kuesioner yang berfungsi mengetahui persepsi siswa terhadap problem solving tasks. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan signifikan antara pretest dan posttest diantara semua group. Namun yang lebih signifikan muncul di group heterogen.. Hampir semua siswa memiliki respon yang positive terhadap problem solving task. Temuan ini membuktikan problem solving tasks lebih sukses untuk siswa yang memiliki kemampuan rendah dalam bahasa inggris di dalam group heterogen serta respon siswa yang positif di dalam kuesioner membuktikan bahwa implementasi problem solving task sangat berperan positif dalam mengoptimalkan kemampuan berbicara, membuat siswa lebih aktif di kelas  serta memacu interaksi yang konstruktif dan saling menguntungkan.

The aims of the current research  were to investigate i) whether there was a statistically  significant difference of quantity and quality of students’spoken interaction between pretest and posttest from different level proficiency groups after they were given the problem solving tasks based cooperative learning and  ii)  the students’ perception of the use of  the problem solving tasks. The research used quantitative and qualitative approaches and involved one class which consisted of 36 students who took English 1 subject as a compulsory subject at IBI Darmajaya. The used instruments were the pretest and posttest, and questionnaire. It was found that there was a significant difference in the quantity and quality of the students’ spoken interaction between pretest and posttest in heterogeneous group. Most students had positive perceptions of the problem solving tasks. The findings prove that the  problem solving task integrated in cooperative learning was more successful for low proficient students in the heterogeneous group. The students’ responses to the questionnaire indicate that the problem solving tasks facilitate the students to be more active in the groups to complete the procedures of the task. The students enjoyed sharing sessions in building their ideas to be presented among the members of the group.

Keywords : Cooperative learning, problem solving tasks, quality and quantity of students’ spoken interaction.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arumugam. (2011). Students and

teachers trouble shared,

trouble halved.

International Journal for Education Studies, 3(2)

Baer, J. (2003). Grouping and

achievement in cooperative learning. College Teaching, 51, 169–175.

Hatch, E. and Farhady, H. (1982). Reseach design and statistics for applied linguistics. London: Newburry House Publisher.

Heaton, JB. (1988). Writing English

language test, new edition. Longman handbooks for language teachers. London and NewYork

Inoue.(2009). Investigating the

sensitivity of the measure of fluency, accuracy, complexity, and idea units with a narrative task. Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching, Vol. 4

Johnson & Smith. (2013).

Cooperative learning :

Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellent in University Teaching

Lewis, R. (1997). Indonesian

students’ learning styles. EA Journal, 14(2), 27-32.

Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C.,

Stroet, K., & Bosker, R. (2012). Observed lesson structure during the first year of secondary education: Exploration of change and link with academic engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 835-850.

Mei Leaong & Ahmadi. (2016). An

analysis of factor influencing learners’ english speaking skill. International Journal of Research in English Education

Memar, Memar & Baleghizadeh.

(2010). The effect of symmetrical versus asymetrical scaffolding on English reading comprehension of EFL Learners. Studies in Literature and Language, Vol. 1

Nejad & Shahrebabaki. (2015).

Effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on the reading comprehension of English language learners through cognitive academic language learning approach (CALLA). International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching. p. 133-164

Slavin .(1995). Research on

cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Center for Research on the Education of Students

Stone. (1998). The methapor of

scaffolding. Its Utility for the Field of Learning

Disabilities

Sunarti. (2006).Cooperative learning

: Heterogeneous Vs homogeneous grouping.

Apera Conference

Vygotski. (1978). Mind in society.

Harvard University Press

Watanabe & Swain.(2007). Effects

of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research ; 11; 121

Zamani, Mona. (2016). Cooperative

learning : Homogeneous and heteregeneous grouping of Iranian EFL learners in a writing context. Cogent Education


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 U-JET

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.