A Modified Word Part Strategy based on Interactive Approach

Ryan Puby Sumarta, Bambang Setiyadi, Flora Flora

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan dalam pencapaian kosa kata antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi bagian kata yang dimodifikasi berdasarkan pada pendekatan interaktif dan strategi bagian kata, dan untuk menyelidiki keterlibatan siswa dalam kelas kosa kata. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas dua SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Bandar Lampung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik dalam pencapaian kosa kata antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi bagian kata yang dimodifikasi berdasarkan pendekatan interaktif dan strategi bagian kata. Ini menunjukkan bahwa strategi pengajaran kosa kata adalah salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi prestasi kosa kata siswa. Selain itu, penggunaan strategi bagian kata yang dimodifikasi berdasarkan pendekatan interaktif dalam pengajaran kosakata dianggap lebih efektif untuk mendorong siswa untuk terlibat dalam proses kegiatan belajar mengajar daripada penggunaan strategi bagian kata.

This present study is aimed to find out the difference in vocabulary achievement between students who are taught with the modified word part strategy based on interactive approach and the word part strategy, and to investigate students’ engagement in vocabulary class. The subjects of this research were the second grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 3 Bandar Lampung. The result showed that there was a statistically significant difference in vocabulary achievement between students who were taught with the modified word part strategy based on interactive approach and the word part strategy. It indicates that the vocabulary teaching strategy is one of the factors which affects the students’ vocabulary achievement. Furthermore, the use of modified word part strategy based on interactive approach in teaching vocabulary is regarded as being more effective to encourage students to be involved in the process of teaching learning activities than the use of word part strategy.

Keywords : Interactive approach, vocabulary, word part strategy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhatti, M. S., Iqbal, A., and Javed, Z. (2016). Improving vocabulary through affixes at secondary level. Proceedings of ADVED 2016 2nd International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences, 511-515. Turkey: Istanbul.

Carter, R. (1998). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. London: Routledge.

Dary, T., Pickeral, T., Shumer, R., and Williams, A. (2016). Weaving student engagement into the core practices of schools: A national dropout prevention center/network position paper. Clemson, SC: National Dropout Prevention Center/Network.

Ebrahimain, A., and Nabifar, N. (2015). The effect of three vocabulary learning strategies of word-part, word-card and context-clue on Iranian high school students’ immediate and delayed English vocabulary learning and retention. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(17), 42-63.

Gunuc, S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and their academic achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(4), 216-231.

Hasani, M. T., Mousavi, S., and Zarei, A. A. (2014). The effect of the number of affixes on vocabulary learning of Iranian intermediate EFL students. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 5(3), 84-96.

Kim, C. (2013). Vocabulary acquisition with affixation: Learning English words based on prefixes and suffixes. Second Language Studies, 31(2), 43-80.

Lei, H., Cui, Y., and Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 517–528.

Lin, G. H. C. (2009). Interactive approaches for vocabulary teaching. Paper Presented at AE Conference, 1-17. Taiwan: Kaohsiung.

Nagy W. E., Anderson R., Schommer M., Scott J. A., and Stallman A. C. (1989). Morphological families and word recognition. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262–282.

Nurweni, A. (2017). A teaching and learning practice incorporating students’ own goal and their institutional goal in big-sized English classes. Fifth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT 2017). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 10, 142-148.

Sanusi, E. (2009). The techniques of teaching vocabulary. Ittihad Jurnal Kopertis Wilayah XI Kalimantan, 7(11), 1-20.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stahl, S. A., and Shiel, T. G. (1992). Teaching meaning vocabulary: Productive approaches for poor readers. Reading and Wriling Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 8, 223-241.

Tang, E. (2007). An exploratory study of the English vocabulary size of Hong Kong primary and junior secondary school students. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(1), 125-144.

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York: Higher Education Academy.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 U-JET

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.