An Analysis Of Students’ Speaking Performance Through Seven Components Of Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) At Midwifery Department
Abstract
Artikel ini dimaksudkan untuk mencaritahu apakah ada perbedaan yang signifikan sebelum dan sesudah tujuh komponen berbicara dan aspek-aspek apa yang paling meningkat dalam berbicara setelah diajarkan melalui tujuh komponen CTL. Ketujuh komponen CTL meningkatkan kinerja berbicara siswa kebidanan. Subyek penelitian adalah mahasiswa jurusan kebidanan di Universitas Malahayati. Penelitian ini salah satu kelas percobaan sebagai subjek penelitian. Mereka berjumlah 30 siswa. Data diambil dengan mengamati dosen pada pertemuan pertama, merekam pasangan pengamat, dan mewawancarai perwakilan siswa. Peneliti menemukan bahwa ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam kemampuan berbicara melalui komponen-komponen CTL. Akurasi adalah aspek terbaik dalam berbicara dalam penelitian ini. Konstruktivisme, pertanyaan dan komponen pertanyaan dalam CTL yang mempengaruhi kinerja berbicara.
This article was intended to find out whether there is a significant difference before and after the treatments of seven components of CTL and what aspects of speaking improve best after being taught through the seven components of CTL. This research also wants to investigate how the seven components of CTL improve midwifery students’ speaking performance. The subjects of the study were the students of the Midwifery Department in Malahayati University. This study took one class as the subject of the research. They were 30 students. The data were taken by observing the lecturer at the first meeting, recording the dialogue in pairs, observing the involvement of the students after having treated by the researcher, and interviewing the representative students. The researcher found that there is a significant difference in the speaking performance treated by CTL components. Accuracy was the best aspect of speaking performance in this present study. Constructivism, inquiry and questioning components in the CTL which affect the speaking performance.
Keywords: Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL), seven components of CTL, speaking performance.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Annisa, S. 2015. Enhancing Speaking Skill through Constructive Techniques. English Education Journal (EEJ). 6 (4): 497-510.
Bain, K. 2004. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brinton, D.M., Snow, M.A., and Wesche, M. 1989. Content-Based Second Language Instruction.New York: Newbury House.
Cotton, K. (1988). Classroom Questioning. Retrieved January 23, 2018, from
http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/3/cu5.html.
Depdiknas. 2002. PendekatanKomunikatif (Communicative Language Teaching). Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Flora et al. 2003. Meningkatakn Kemampuan Bahasa Inggris Siswa Kelas 1 SMU YP Unila melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual. Bandar Lampung. Universitas Lampung.
Fraenkel, J. R. and Wallen, N. E. 1990. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Heaton, H. 1978. Components of Speaking Skill. (http://the-components-of-speaking-ability.html, retrieved on November 14th, 2012)
Jonassen, D. H. 1999. Contextual Teaching and Learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc.
Lado, R., 1961. Language Testing: The Construction and Use of Foreign Language Tests. London: Longman.
Lesáková, Z. 2008. Teaching Productive Skills in Mixed-Ability Classes. Masaryk University Faculty Of Education Department of English Language and Literature.
Mattarima, K and Hamdan, A. 2011. The Teaching Constraints of English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia: The Context of School Based Curriculum. Sosiohumanika. 4(2): 116-135
Mbeh, A. T. 2017. Impromptu Speaking and Authentic Assessment in English Language Teaching/Learning.International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR) ISSN: 2454-4116. 3 (3): 11-16.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S.M., and Kemp, J. E. 2001. Designing Effective Instruction. New Baskerville: Georgetown University Press.
Mulgrave, D. 1954. Speech: A Handbook of Voice Training Diction and Public Speaking. New York: Barnes & Noble Inc.
Nunan, D. 1988. Principles for Designing Language Teaching Materials. Adelaide: National Curriculum Research Center.
Obemeata. 1999. Instructional Materials In Teaching Language-Effectiveness. (http://doublegist.com/instructional-materials-effectiveness-teaching-english-language/, retrieved on November 12th, 2014).
Preece, A. S.D and Bularafa, M. 2015. Community of Inquiry Method and Language Skills Acquisition: Empirical Evidence.Journal of Education and PracticeISSN: 2222-1735 (Paper), ISSN: 2222-288X (Online).6 (27):215-238
Richards, J. C. 1990. Conversationally Speaking: Approaches to the Teaching
of Conversation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sears. S.J. 2002. Contextual Teaching and Learning: A Primer for Effective Instruction. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Setiyadi, Ag. B. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif.Yogyakarta: GrahaIlmu.
Skehan, P., and Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning.49 (2): 93–120.
Sugiyanto, 2008. Definition and Types of Learning Model. (Online),
(http://neweconomicseducation.blogspot.co.id/2012/07/definition-and-types-of-learning-model.html, retrieved on March 27th, 2016).
Susanto, and Latief, A. 2016. English Oral Communication Material for Midwifery Students. International Conference on Education (IECO) Proceeding, 2016 ISBN: 978-602-6988-21-8. Copyright ©2016, LPPM, University of MuhammadiyahJember. 1 (1): 524-533.
Suwandono, A. 2005. Seratus Ribu Perawat dan Bidan RI Nganggur.(http://perawatbidanoverseas.blogspot.com/2006/08/seratus-ribu-perawat-bidan-di-ri:nganggur_I/html, retrieved on November 12th, 2014).
Syakur. 1987. Language Testing and Evaluation. Surakarta: SebelasMaret University Press.
Tarigan, D. 1991. Materi Pokok Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia I. Jakarta: Dikti, Depdikbud.
Tinto, V. and Russo, P. (1994). Coordinated studies programs: Their effect on
Student involvement at a community college. Community college review.22 (2): 16-25.
Zhao, C.M and Kuh, G.D. 2004. Adding Value:Learning Communities and Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education.45 (2): 188-201
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 U-JET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.