The Cognitive Strategy Training : Blocked Buttom-Up Top-Down Approach In Listening Class

Eka Pra Setiyawati, Muhammad Sukirlan, Mahpul Mahpul

Abstract


Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui apakah pelatihan strategi kognitif berdasarkan pendekatan blok buttom-up top-down mempengaruhi kemampuan mendengar siswa terutama pada empat aspek mendengar. Desain penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif dengan satu kelompok pre-test post –test. Instrumen pada  penelitian ini berupa tes mendengar dengan 9 butir soal. Validitas instrumen diukur menggunakan pearson product moment dan reliabilitas instrumen diukur menggunakan correlation product moment dan spearman brown. Subjek penelitian diambil dengan random klaster, yaitu 21 siswa SMA kelas XI. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa aspek dalam kemampuan mendengar siswa meningkat, tertinggi pada aspek menentukan detail (36%) dan terendah pada aspek menentukan ide pokok (13%). Akhirnya, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pelatihan strategi kognitif berdasarkan pendekatan blok buttom-up top-down dapat mempengaruhi kemampuan mendengar siswa.

This research was conducted to find out whether cognitive strategy training based on blocked buttom-up top-down approach affect the students’ listening comprehension in term of four listening’s aspects. The design of this research was quantitative with one-group pretest-posttest design.The instrument was 9 items of listening test. The validity of the research was measured using pearson product moment and the reliability of the research was measured with correlation product moment and spearman brown.The subject who were chosen by cluster random sampling, were 21 second year of senior high school students.The result of the data analysis showed that the aspects of listening comprehension were improved mainly in finding detail (36%) and lowly in finding main idea (13%).Finally, it could be concluded that cognitive strategy training based on blocked buttom-up top-down approach could affect the students’ listening comprehension.

Keywords: Buttom-up top-down approach, cognitive strategy training, listening.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Qaraghooly, D. A; Al-Bermani, H. K. K. (2010). The effect of top-down and bottom up processing on developing efl students’ listening comprehension. AL-Fatih Journal, 4(5), 15-40.

Bacon, S. M. (1992). Phases of listening to authentic input in Spanish: A descriptive study.Foreign Language Annals, 25(3), 317-334.

Dwiarti, E. (2005). An analysis of students’ problems in finding the main idea of the text at second year of smu kosgoro sekampung, east lampung. Script. Unpublished Script. Bandar Lampung: University of Lampung.

EF EPI-s. (2017). EFEnglish Proficiency Index for School. The EF Standard Test.(www.ef-set.org, accessed on January 13, 2018).

Helgesen, M;Steven, B. (2007).Practical english language teaching: listening. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Henderson, X. (2017). An investigation of metacognitive, bottom-up and top-down strategies in l2 listening. Thesis. Unpublished Thesis. Monterey Bay: California State University.

Herron, C. A; Seay I. (1991). The effect of authentic oral texts on student listening comprehension in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 24(5), 487-495.

Hildyard, A; Olson, D. R. (1982). On the comprehension and memory of oral vs. written discourse. in tannen, deborah (ed.), spoken and written language: exploring orality and literacy (pp. 19–33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.

Hunsaker, R. A. (1990). Understanding and developing the skills of oral communication: speaking end listening (2nd ed.). Englewood, CO: J. Morton Press.

Mandarani, V. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan listening comprehension melalui strategi top-down dan bottom-up.Jurnal Pedagogia,5( 2), 189-196.

Norris, R. W. (1995). Teaching reduced forms: putting the horse before the cart.English Teaching Forum, 33(3), 47-50.

Nunan, D. (2010). Teaching english for young learners. USA: Anaheim University Press.

Oh, E; Lee, C. M. (2014). The role of linguistic knowledge and listening strategies in bottom-up and top-down processing of l2 listening. English Teaching, 69(2), 149-173.

Renandya, W. A; Li, W. (2012). Effective approaches to teaching listening: chinese efl teachers’ perspectives.The Journal of Asia TEFL,9(4), 79-111.

Ristanti, S; Eliwarti; Maria, D. (2013). Astudy on the ability in listening comprehension on descriptive text by the 2nd semester students of english study program fkip-ur.Script. Unpublished Script. Pekanbaru: Riau University Press.

Shuell, T. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning.Review of Educational Research,56(4), 411-436.

Thompson, I; Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension?.Foreign Language Annals, 29(3),331-342.

Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: acquiring successful strategies.ELT Journal, Volume 53: 168-176.

Wipf, J. A. (1984). Strategies for teaching second language listening comprehension.Foreign Language Annals,17(4), 345-348.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 U-JET

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.