Developing Online Reading And Discussion Boards On Facebook As Pre-Writing Activities To Improve Students Writing Achievement
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilaksanakan untuk mengetahui apakah online reading dan discussion boards pada facebook sebagai kegiatan pre-writing dapat meningkatkan kualitas writinglebih baik daripada kegiatan pre-writing melalui printed text reading, aspek writing apa yang meningkat secara signifikan dan persepsi siswa terhadap ORDB. Pada desain quantitatif, uji tes awal dan tes akhir kelompok kontrol dilakukan dan pada desain qualitatif, kuesioner dilaksankan.Pada pengumpulan data, teswriting, analisa dokumen, dan kuesioner digunakan. Subyek dibagi dua kelompok, eksperimen dan kontrol, masing-masing terdiri dari 17 siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukan nilai signifikan dua arah 0.000. Berdasarkan aspek writing yang meningkat secara signifikan, ORDB meningkatkan kualitas writing terutama pada vocabulary. Siswa meningkat pada vocabulary dengan penambahan 1.62 (8.1%) dengan pre-writing melalui printed-text reading dan 3.06 (15.3%) dengan ORDB. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan pada kedua kegiatan pre-writing. Berdasarkan kuesioner, diketahui bahwa metode ini dapat meningkatkan motivasi dan partisipasi dalam menulis.
This research was conducted to find out whether online reading and discussion boards on facebook as pre-writing activities can improve writing quality better than pre-writing activity through printed text, what aspects of writing significantly improved, and the students perception of ORDB. In quantitative design, control group pre-test and post-test design was conducted and in qualitative design, questionnaire was conducted. To collect the data, the writing test, document analysis, and questionnaire were used. The subjects were divided into two groups, the experimental and control, each consists of 17. The result showed the value of two-tailed significance was 0.000. Based on the aspects of writing which are significantly improved, ORDB promoted their writing performance mainly in vocabulary. Students improved vocabulary with gain 1.62 (8.1%) with pre-writing through printed text and 3.06 (15.3%) with ORDB. The result showed the difference of both pre-writing. Based on questionnaire, it was noted that it may increase motivation and participation in writing.
Keywords: Discussion Boards, Facebook, Online Reading, Pre-writing.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alkaff, Amal Ali. (2013). Students Attitudes and Perceptions towards Learning English. Arab World English Journal, Vol.4, No.2, pp.106-121.
Al-Rajhi, Ali M. (2004). Joining The Online Literacy Club: Internet Reading Among Saudi EFL Learners(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Al-Shaer, I.M.R. (2014). Employing Concept Mapping as a Pre-writing Strategy to Help EFL Learners Better Generate Argumentative Compositions. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol.8, No.2, pp.1-29.
Arju, Saima. (2016). Motivation Matters in Adopting Prewriting Strategies and Improving Writing Achievement among Bangladesh Adult EFL Learners.Asian Journal of Management Sciences&Education, Vol.5, No.3, pp.139-152.
Bakare, S. I. (2016). Lexical and Syntatic Errors in The English of Social Media Platform Users: A Study of Facebook and LinkedIn (Unpublished Thesis). University of Lagos, Nigeria.
Becker, Anthony. (2010). Examining Rubrics Used to Measure Writing Performance in U.S. Intensive English Programs. The Catesol Journal, Vol.22, No.1, pp.113-130.
Coiro, Julie. (2011). Predicting Reading Comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of Offline Reading Skills, Online Reading Skills, and Prior Knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, Vol.43, No.4, pp.352-392.
Ghanbaria, M., and Marzbanb, A.(2013). Effect of Extensive Reading on Incidental Vocabulary Retention. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.116, No. 2, pp.3854-3858.
Go, A.S. (1994). Prewriting activities: Focus on the process of writing. Eric Processing and Reference Facility, Vol.36, No.9, pp.1-9.
Hatch and Farhady. (1981). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newburry.
Huang, Su-Yueh. (1999). EFL Students' Use of Ideas Provided by Peers during Prewriting Discussions Conducted on Networked Computers (Unpublished Thesis). Tunghai University.
Inal, Sevim. (2014). The Effect of The Clustering Pre-writing Strategy on Turkish Students Writing Achievement and Their Writing Attitudes. ASOS Journal, Vol.2, No.1, pp.593-611.
Jacobs, H.L., Zingraf, S.A., Wormuth, D.R., Hartfiel, V.Y and Hughey, J.B. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Research Gate.
Kamnoetsin, Tharinee. (2014). Social Media Use: A Critical Analysis of Facebook'sImpact on Collegiate EFL Students' English Writing in Thailand (Unpublisehd Dissertation). Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs).
Knowlton, D. S., and Knowlton, H. M. (2001). The Context and Content of Online Discussions: Making Cyber-Discussions Viable for the Secondary School Curriculum. American Secondary Education, Vol.29, No.4, pp.3852.
LaRoche, K.M. (1993). A focus on using prewriting and knowledge levelstrategies and skills to improve the attitudes and writing skills ofmiddle school students (Unpublished Thesis). Nova University.
Lee, Y.H., and Wu, J. Y. (2012). The effect of individual differences in the inner and outer states of ICT on engagement in online reading activities and PISA 2009 reading literacy: Exploring the relationship between the old and new reading literacy. Learning and Individual Differencies, Vol.22, No.3, pp.336-342.
Lee, Y.W., and Gentile, K. (2008). Analytic Scoring of TOEFL CBT Essays: Scores From Humans and E-rater (RR-0801).Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Leu, Donal J., Coiro, J., Castek, J., Hartman, D. K., Henry, L. A., and Reinking, D. (2008). Research on Instruction and Assessment in the New Literacies of Online ReadingComprehension. In C. C. Block, S. Parris, & P. Afflerbach. (Eds.). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 321346). New York: Guilford Press.
Lin, S.Y.,Jane, S., Beverly, R., and Peter, D. (2004). Computer-Based Concept Mapping as a Prewriting Strategy for Middle School Students.Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, Vol.7, No.2, pp.1-17.
Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., and Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media & Technology, Vol.34, No.2, pp.141-155.
Mariani, Luciano. (2010). Beliefs and Attitudes: A Key to Learner and Teacher Progression.LearningPaths.or.
Maurino, P.S.M. (2006). Looking for Critical Thinking in Online Threaded Discussions. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, Vol.9, No.2, pp.1-18.
Mogahed, M. (2013). Planning out pre-writing activities. International Journal of English and Literature.International Journal of English and Literature, Vol.4, No.3, pp.60-68.
Moghaddas, B. (2011). The Effect of Pre-Writing Activities on theIndian ESL Learners Composition Skills. ELT Voices, pp.88-95.
Putra, W.H. (2016). The Utilization of Facebook Closed Group Peer Correction in Teaching Writing (Unpublished Thesis). Bandar Lampung: Lampung University.
Setiyadi, Ag. Bambang. (2006). Teaching English as A Foreign Language.Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.
Shafiee, S., Koosha, M. and Afghari, A. (2013). The Effect of Conventional, Web-based, and Hybrid Teaching of Pre-Writing Strategies on Iranian EFL Learners Writing Performance. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences,Vol.4, No.2, pp.393-401.
Sukhor, S.S. (2014). Effects of Facebook Collaborative Writing Groups on ESL Undergraduates Writing Performance. International Journal of English Language Education, Vol.2, No.2, pp.89-99.
TeacherStream LLC, (2009). Mastering Online Discussion Boards Facilitation. Edutopedia.org.
Yunus, M.D., and Salehi, H.(2012). The Effectiveness of Facebook Groups on Teachingand Improving Writing: Students Perceptions. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies,Vol.6, No.1, pp.87-96.
Zaid, A.M. (2011). Effects of web-based pre-writing activities on college EFL students writing performance andtheir writing apprehension. Journal of King Saud University Language and Translation,Vol.23, No.3, pp.77-85.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 U-JET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.